VS

Citroen C3 vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (113 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Suzuki Swace?

Citroen C3 vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • visibly lighter
details

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen C3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,172 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Swace offers slightly more power – delivering 140 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Swace is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 9.4 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

C3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is visibly lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 249 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers clearly more boot space – 596 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 286 L.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen C3 carries somewhat more – 423 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £13,700
C3

Citroen C3

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 113 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 212 - 325 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Citroen C3 Aircross
VS
Deciding between the Citroën C3 and the Citroën C3 Aircross is basically a choice between a compact, city-focused hatch and a taller, more practical crossover. The C3 prioritises nimble handling, simplicity and economy for urban driving, while the C3 Aircross adds higher ride height, extra interior …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Citroen C3
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a stylish and practical small hatchback that puts comfort and a calm urban driving experience at the top of its list. With its distinctive looks and thoughtful interior touches, it suits buyers who want personality and everyday usability without drama.

details
CITROEN_C3_25
CITROEN_C3_26
CITROEN_C3_44
12D30_01

Reviews Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused hatch with quirky styling or a slightly larger, more versatile crossover with a higher driving position. I’ll compare practicality, fuel economy, driving feel and value so you can pick …
Citroen C3
Fiat Panda
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Fiat Panda often comes down to whether you want a comfort-focused, stylish city hatch or a no-nonsense, practical small car. I’ll highlight the key differences in interior space, fuel economy, driving feel and running costs so you can decide which suits your …
Citroen C3
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Comparing the Citroën C3 and the Fiat Panda shows two different takes on small cars: the C3 emphasises comfort, style and a quieter ride, while the Panda prioritises practicality, space efficiency and rugged simplicity. Choose the C3 for a refined, tech-friendly city runabout; choose the Panda for …
Citroen C3
Citroen C4
VS
The Citroën C3 is the cheeky city hatch that charms with low running costs, soft suspension and easy parking, while the Citroën C4 stretches into crossover territory with more space, stronger engines and sharper tech. If you mostly nip around town grab the C3 for its thrift and comfort; if you want …
Citroen C3
MG MG3
VS
Comparing the Citroën C3 and the MG3 puts two budget-friendly city hatchbacks head-to-head: the C3 leans toward comfort, distinctive styling and a refined ride, while the MG3 focuses on low cost, generous interior space and straightforward practicality. If you value a plush, design-led small car go …
Citroen C3
Opel Corsa
VS
The Citroën C3 charms with its quirky French flair, plush seats and a ride tuned more for comfort than cornering, while the Opel Corsa plays the sensible all-rounder with sharper handling, a tidier cabin and a broader engine lineup. If you want personality and city-friendly cushioning, pick the C3; …
Citroen C3
Peugeot 208
VS
Forget badge snobbery: the Citroën C3 is the comfy, quirky city car that soaks up potholes and prioritises practicality, while the Peugeot 208 feels sharper to drive with a more premium cabin and livelier engines. Pick the C3 for relaxed, characterful motoring and the 208 if you want style and …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Citroen C3
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 126 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,755 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
227 - 423 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Citroen C3 have?

The Citroen C3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.