VS

Fiat Tipo Wagon vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (21,000 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Tipo Wagon or Toyota C-HR+?

Fiat Tipo Wagon vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Fiat Tipo Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tipo Wagon

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Fiat Tipo Wagon is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,000 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,000 £.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers significantly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 213 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Fiat Tipo Wagon takes 9.1 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers barely more torque with 338 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 18 Nm more.

Tipo Wagon

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Tipo Wagon is noticeably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 355 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Fiat Tipo Wagon offers noticeably more boot space – 550 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 134 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries clearly more – 655 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Fiat Tipo Wagon
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat Tipo Wagon

The Fiat Tipo Estate is a no-nonsense family wagon that focuses on practicality and value, with surprisingly generous load space and comfortable seats for long trips. It won't win style awards, but its sensible kit, simple controls and low running costs make it a smart, unfussy choice for buyers who want function over flash.

details
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_05
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_06
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_13

Reviews Fiat Tipo Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
G.Piero
8 Apr 2026, 21:55:08

Value for money is its strong point...
Avoid the 3-cylinder petrol and the 1.3 mjt 95 hp — far too little to move 1,500 kg, very sluggish in acceleration.
The only and excellent compromise is the 1.6 mjt2 131 hp; despite weighing 1,500 kg it moves it with plenty of ease and verve (9.5 sec 0–100 km/h), giving real satisfaction.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
VW ID.4
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the VW ID.4 and the Toyota C-HR+ sets an electric compact SUV against a fuel-efficient compact crossover, so your decision comes down to whether you want a pure-EV experience or practical economy and distinctive styling. This quick comparison highlights the ID.4’s electric range, charging …
Toyota Corolla Cross
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Corolla Cross and the C‑HR can be confusing—both are compact crossovers but they target different buyers. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how the Corolla Cross's practical, roomy approach stacks up against the C‑HR's sharp styling and driving focus, so you …
Fiat Tipo Wagon
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,000 - 27,000 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,470 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
550 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
4,571 mm
Length
-
Width
1,792 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
1,514 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
206 - 207 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
1,469 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Fiat Tipo Wagon have?

The Fiat Tipo Wagon is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.