VS

KGM Torres vs SEAT Ateca comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 25,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Torres or SEAT Ateca?

KGM Torres vs SEAT Ateca: Key differences

KGM Torres

  • barely cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

SEAT Ateca

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Torres

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

KGM Torres is barely cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the SEAT Ateca costs 25,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 257 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Ateca uses 4.9 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the KGM Torres with 6.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

Ateca

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the KGM Torres offers markedly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SEAT Ateca delivers noticeably more torque with 360 Nm compared to 280 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Ateca is a bit lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 153 kg.

Looking at boot space, the KGM Torres offers noticeably more boot space – 703 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 193 L.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Torres carries very slightly more – 580 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Torres is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
Torres

KGM Torres

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.1 - 9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
KGM Torres
SEAT Ateca

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

KGM Torres

The Torres presents a modern, practical take on the SUV, with tidy styling and a focus on day-to-day usability. Its cabin is comfortable and thoughtfully arranged, prioritizing convenience and a composed driving experience.

details
serpimg_yEptnP

Reviews KGM Torres

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

SEAT Ateca

The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ
SEAT-Ateca_012
SEAT-Ateca_011
SEAT-Ateca_006
SEAT-Ateca_004

Reviews SEAT Ateca

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
Nico
20 May 2026, 12:31:33

+ Great, firm seats, large boot for such a compact car, good fuel economy, lots of interior space, uncomplicated controls, very agile and safe handling, good build quality, very good steering, good braking performance, relatively small turning circle
- Very poor voice control and navigation, cockpit display too small with very small fonts and symbols, steering wheel too thin, seats too flat despite electric adjustment, poor engine soundproofing, tank far too small, complicated maintenance (oil change appalling), undersized rear brake, fuel filler on the wrong side, sound almost without bass (Beats)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
SEAT Ateca
VS
As compact SUVs that balance practicality and value, the Hyundai Tucson and SEAT Ateca are popular choices for buyers seeking everyday comfort with sensible running costs. This comparison cuts through the specs to show which model — the Tucson or the Ateca — suits your needs better, whether you …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq offer distinct yet appealing options for buyers. The Ateca impresses with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it a favorite among those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Kamiq stands out for its …
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ateca
VS
SEAT Arona and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Kia Sportage
SEAT Ateca
VS
When comparing the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca, both models stand out for their blend of style and practicality. The Sportage boasts a more spacious interior and a comprehensive suite of tech features, appealing to families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Ateca offers agile handling …
Audi Q3
SEAT Ateca
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its refined interior and advanced technology features, offering a luxurious driving experience. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca impresses with its sporty design and excellent value, making it a practical choice for those seeking both …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Karoq
VS
Comparing the SEAT Ateca and the Skoda Karoq shows two capable compact SUVs aimed at slightly different buyers: the Ateca emphasises sportier handling and sharper styling, while the Karoq focuses on interior space, practicality and comfort. Choose the Ateca for a more engaging drive and bolder …
SEAT Ateca
Toyota RAV4
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Toyota RAV4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
SEAT Ateca
Volvo XC40
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
KGM Torres
SEAT Ateca

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 39,500 £
Price
25,100 - 36,900 £
Consumption L/100km
6.1 - 9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
139 - 205 g/km
co2
129 - 144 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,670 kg
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,514 kg
Trunk capacity
703 L
Trunk capacity
510 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,841 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
552 - 580 kg
Payload
516 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 204 HP
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
280 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
120 - 150 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
KGM
Brand
SEAT
What drivetrain options does the KGM Torres have?

The KGM Torres is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.