VS

Skoda Kamiq vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Mazda CX-5?

Skoda Kamiq vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kamiq is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,723 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kamiq uses 5.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers only slightly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kamiq delivers marginally more torque with 250 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.

Kamiq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is noticeably lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 398 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers moderately more boot space – 466 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries slightly more – 601 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kamiq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,300
Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Skoda Kamiq
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Skoda Kamiq
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Small crossover showdown: the Skoda Kamiq and Toyota Yaris Cross both promise compact-SUV practicality, but they take very different routes — the Kamiq leans on clever space, solid build and punchy petrols, while the Yaris Cross trades on hybrid frugality and nimble city manners. We’ll compare …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Picking between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Kamiq is largely a choice between a sportier, style-led crossover and a more practical, spacious, value-focused one. Both share similar underpinnings and efficient engines, but the Arona leans toward engaging looks and driving feel while the Kamiq …
Opel Mokka
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Vauxhall Mokka and Skoda Kamiq are compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with practical interiors and up-to-date technology. This comparison looks at how the Mokka and Kamiq stack up on space, driving feel, efficiency and value so you can pick the better fit for your daily …
Skoda Kamiq
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
121 - 128 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
400 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,793 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 539 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kamiq have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.