VS

SsangYong Rexton vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Skoda Kodiaq?

SsangYong Rexton vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kodiaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,257 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 6.7 L/100km.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Rexton delivers marginally more torque with 441 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 41 Nm more.

Rexton

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is visibly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers somewhat more boot space – 910 L compared to 784 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries clearly more – 770 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 207 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
SsangYong Rexton
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
SsangYong Rexton
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
214 - 216 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4,850 mm
Length
-
Width
1,960 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
1,825 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
655 - 770 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
184 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
441 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
148 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.