Compare performance (400 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (27,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Limousine or Skoda Scala?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive world eagerly awaits thrilling comparisons, and this time, we delve into the intricacies of the Audi A3 Limousine and the Skoda Scala. Both contenders spring from the Volkswagen Group, sharing a lineage yet offering distinct experiences. Let's journey through the specifications and performance dynamics that define these two vehicles.
The Audi A3 Limousine offers an eclectic mix of engines. Ranging from a 116 HP diesel engine to an exhilarating 400 HP petrol MHEV, the lineup caters to varied driving appetites. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h spans from 10.1 seconds for the diesel to a swift 3.8 seconds in its top-tier configuration.
In contrast, the Skoda Scala focuses on petrol-driven power, presenting options from 95 HP to a respectable 150 HP. Delivering a nimble driving experience, the Scala accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h between 10.8 and 8.2 seconds, suiting urban commutes and highway cruises seamlessly.
Efficiency norms see the Audi A3 Limousine presenting a broad spectrum of consumption rates, ranging from 4.8 to 9.1 L/100km, melding performance with economy. Skoda Scala maintains a simpler consumption bracket of 5.1 to 5.6 L/100km, emphasizing fiscal prudence and eco-conscious driving.
Both vehicles adhere to CO2 efficiency, with the Audi classified between D and G, while the Scala achieves a better classification between D and C, aligning with environmentally aware drivers.
As a sedan, the Audi A3 Limousine boasts dimensions enhancing its sporty yet sophisticated demeanor, stretching to a length of 4504 mm with a compact 1417 mm height. It comfortably seats five and supports a trunk capacity between 321 and 425 liters, suiting weekend escapes and executive travel alike.
The Skoda Scala, a hatchback, manifests practicality with a length of 4362 mm and a higher stance at 1514 mm. It accommodates five individuals with an ample trunk capacity of 467 liters, excelling in versatility for dynamic lifestyles and family needs.
Audi’s commitment to innovation shines through with its advanced dual-clutch automatic transmission and the availability of both all-wheel and front-wheel drive systems, catering to diverse driver preferences. With varying engine capacities from 1498 to 2480 cm3, the A3 is an epitome of technological prowess.
The Scala focuses on efficiency without skimping on technology. Its straightforward engineering, featuring a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic option, echoes reliability. Harnessing a three to four-cylinder engine array, it balances performance with economy skillfully.
Deciding between the Audi A3 Limousine and the Skoda Scala rests upon personal preferences, distinguishing tastes, and driving needs. The Audi offers an exhilarating drive enriched with luxury and advanced power, extending towards tech-focused and performance-loving individuals.
The Skoda Scala, on its part, resonates well with those favoring practicality, fuel efficiency, and smart design, appealing to families and city-savvy drivers.
Both cars offer something compelling, ensuring that whichever your choice, it remains a blend of satisfaction and thrill on the road.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Scala is visibly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Audi A3 Limousine costs 27,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,257 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Limousine uses 4.4 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Skoda Scala with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Limousine offers substantially more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 250 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Limousine is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Scala takes 8.2 s. That’s about 4.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Limousine delivers substantially more torque with 500 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Scala is a bit lighter – 1,199 kg compared to 1,360 kg. The difference is around 161 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Scala offers barely more boot space – 467 L compared to 425 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi A3 Limousine carries moderately more – 480 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
The Audi A3 Limousine holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A3 sedan dresses up compact practicality in clean, premium lines, giving you the feel of an upscale small car with a proper boot. Inside it’s neat, driver-focused and nicely finished — a sensible, enjoyable daily companion that prefers poise over showy theatrics.
details
The Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,700 - 94,300 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 9.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
115 - 208 g/km
|
co2
114 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,640 kg
|
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
321 - 425 L
|
Trunk capacity
467 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
415 - 480 kg
|
Payload
403 - 431 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España