Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (551 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (53,800 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Sportback or Volvo S60?
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Volvo S60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A6 e-tron Sportback
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Volvo S60 is clearly cheaper – starting at 42,500 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback costs 53,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,314 £.
As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers significantly more range – reaching up to 754 km, about 660 km more than the Volvo S60.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers slightly more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 455 HP. That’s roughly 96 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Volvo S60 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is markedly faster – reaching 240 km/h, while the Volvo S60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback delivers slightly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 709 Nm. That’s about 146 Nm more.
A6 e-tron Sportback
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo S60 is visibly lighter – 1,715 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 460 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers slightly more boot space – 502 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback carries marginally more – 500 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £53,800
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback wraps futuristic electric technology in elegant, coupe-like proportions, so you arrive looking sharp without shouting for attention. Inside, refined materials and a calm, driver-focused layout make it a convincing choice for buyers who want quiet, effortless performance with a dash of everyday practicality — the kind of car that raises eyebrows without saying a word.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
53,800 - 98,700 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
572 - 754 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,400 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
502 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
4,928 mm
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
1,465 - 1,487 mm
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,330 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
470 - 500 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.