VS

Audi Q8 vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (640 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (77,300 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Audi Q8 vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Audi Q8

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q8

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Audi Q8 costs 77,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 65,666 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q8 uses 3.9 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 offers substantially more power – delivering 640 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 569 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 10.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 delivers significantly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 748 Nm more.

Q8

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 1,235 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 offers substantially more boot space – 605 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 370 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 carries markedly more – 665 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 265 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q8 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £77,300
Q8

Audi Q8

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 231 - 640 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.9 - 13.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 80 km
Audi Q8
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q8

The Audi Q8 wraps coupe-like flair around a burly SUV stance, serving up a cabin dressed in premium materials and smart tech that puts comfort and swagger front and center. It’s composed and comfortable on long runs yet happy to play when asked, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want head-turning looks without surrendering everyday practicality.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
Audi Q8
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
77,300 - 137,100 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
3.9 - 13.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
80 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
88 - 297 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,490 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
439 - 605 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,995 - 2,007 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
620 - 665 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
231 - 640 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
500 - 850 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
170 - 471 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
2,967 - 3,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.