Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW XM vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (748 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (114700 £ vs 275400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?
XM
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
BMW XM has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 114700 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 160715 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW XM manages with 4.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L. The difference is about 11.30 L per 100 km.
XM
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM has a somewhat edge – offering 748 HP compared to 600 HP. That’s roughly 148 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.90 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW XM pulls slight stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 900 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
XM
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: BMW XM offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Rolls-Royce Cullinan is hardly perceptible lighter – 2660 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers hardly perceptible more room – 555 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.
When it comes to payload, Rolls-Royce Cullinan evident takes the win – 840 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 315 kg.
Who wins the race?
The BMW XM proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW XM is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £114,700
BMW XM
BMW XM
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW XM
The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.
details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.
details
BMW XM
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
114700 - 157200 £
|
Price
275400 - 324600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
77 - 80 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
25.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
105 - 138 g/km
|
co2
363 - 380 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2695 - 2795 kg
|
Curb weight
2660 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
555 L
|
|
Length
5110 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2005 mm
|
Width
2000 mm
|
|
Height
1755 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1820 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 525 kg
|
Payload
840 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
|
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
250 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
700 - 1000 Nm
|
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
|
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
|
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2998 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
6749 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?
The BMW XM is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.