VS

Fiat Tipo Hatchback vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (19,700 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Tipo Hatchback or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Fiat Tipo Hatchback vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tipo Hatchback

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Fiat Tipo Hatchback is substantially cheaper – starting at 19,700 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 255,695 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Tipo Hatchback uses 4.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 11.3 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers substantially more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 470 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Fiat Tipo Hatchback takes 8.8 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers substantially more torque with 900 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 580 Nm more.

Tipo Hatchback

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Tipo Hatchback is clearly lighter – 1,415 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,245 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers markedly more boot space – 555 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries clearly more – 840 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 415 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Fiat Tipo Hatchback is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £19,700
Tipo Hatchback

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
Fiat Tipo Hatchback
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Fiat Tipo Hatchback

The Fiat Tipo is a sensible, spacious hatchback that prides itself on practical charm and everyday usability, perfect for buyers who want straightforward value rather than runway drama. It won’t turn heads for flash, but its comfortable ride, clever interior space and low-stress nature make it a smart, grown-up choice with a wink of character.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Fiat Tipo Hatchback
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
19,700 - 25,700 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,415 - 1,425 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
4,368 mm
Length
-
Width
1,792 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
1,495 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
207 - 208 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,469 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.