Compare performance (233 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (64,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Nugget or GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Nugget costs 64,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 43,299 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro uses 7.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Ford Nugget with 8.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Nugget offers clearly more power – delivering 233 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Nugget delivers visibly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Nugget is a versatile camper van designed for adventurers who crave both comfort and practicality on the road. With its clever use of space, the Nugget provides ample room for sleeping, cooking, and relaxing, making it a popular choice for those looking to experience the joys of a mobile lifestyle. Its design integrates seamlessly with modern technology, ensuring both convenience and a smooth driving experience.
details
The Haval Jolion Pro punches above its class with sharp styling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and a feature set that feels more premium than its price suggests. It’s an easy-to-live-with compact SUV that aims to charm value-conscious buyers who want style and tech without the badge drama — and it might just make your neighbours ask if you traded up.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64,700 - 78,700 £
|
Price
21,400 - 23,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
8.9 - 9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
234 - 235 g/km
|
co2
167 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,595 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,050 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,898 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
330 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 233 HP
|
Power HP
177 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 171 kW
|
Power kW
130 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
GWM
|