Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia XCeed?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Kia XCeed in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 6.40 L.

What are the Kia XCeed’s length, width and height?

Length 4395 mm, width 1826 mm, height 1483 mm – those are the dimensions of the Kia XCeed.

What drivetrain options does the MG HS/EHS have?

The MG HS/EHS is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the MG HS/EHS's engine?

Up to 272 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the MG HS/EHS in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 0.50 L.

What is the MG HS/EHS’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 100 km.

What are the dimensions of the MG HS/EHS?

Overall, the MG HS/EHS is 4655 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1664 mm high.

Kia XCeed vs MG HS/EHS - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Kia XCeed has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the MG HS/EHS costs 24000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 5.90 L per 100 km.

HS/EHS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a evident edge – offering 272 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 92 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS/EHS is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the MG HS/EHS tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS/EHS pulls distinct stronger with 350 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.

XCeed

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia XCeed is clearly perceptible lighter – 1351 kg compared to 1625 kg. The difference is around 274 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG HS/EHS offers to a small extent more room – 507 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 81 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG HS/EHS performs minimal better – up to 1484 L, which is about 106 L more than the Kia XCeed.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed slightly takes the win – 479 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the MG HS/EHS shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Reviews MG HS/EHS

5 (1 Reviews)

Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Top Car Comparisons

Kia Ceed

Kia XCeed

VS

If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …

Kia Niro

Kia XCeed

VS

In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 - 33000 £	Price 24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 100 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 144 - 155 g/km	co2 14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1351 - 1419 kg	Curb weight 1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity 426 L	Trunk capacity 441 - 507 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4655 - 4670 mm
Width 1826 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height 1483 - 1495 mm	Height 1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity 1378 L	Max trunk capacity 1291 - 1484 L
Payload 471 - 479 kg	Payload 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 180 HP	Power HP 170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 11.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed 182 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 190 - 195 km/h
Torque 200 - 265 Nm	Torque 275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 85 - 132 kW	Power kW 125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity 998 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 1496 cm3