Mazda 3 Sedan vs Peugeot Traveller – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda 3 Sedan?

Depending on the version, the Mazda 3 Sedan delivers up to 186 HP.

Q: What are the consumption figures for the Mazda 3 Sedan in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.50 L.

Q: How many liters of cargo space does the Mazda 3 Sedan offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 450 L fit inside.

Q: What are the Mazda 3 Sedan’s length, width and height?

The Mazda 3 Sedan measures 4660 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1440 mm high.

Q: What drivetrain options does the Peugeot Traveller have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Peugeot Traveller's engine?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: How much fuel does the Peugeot Traveller use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 7 L.

Q: What are the Peugeot Traveller’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Peugeot Traveller consumes around 24.30 kWh.

Q: What is the Peugeot Traveller’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 351 km.

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Peugeot Traveller?

scroll down

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda 3 Sedan has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25000 £, while the Peugeot Traveller costs 34800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9848 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda 3 Sedan manages with 5.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Peugeot Traveller with 7 L. The difference is about 1.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a slight edge – offering 186 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Peugeot Traveller takes 10.60 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Sedan performs to a small extent better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Peugeot Traveller tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot Traveller pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Peugeot Traveller offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 8 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is noticeable lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 533 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Peugeot Traveller offers significantly more room – 2011 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 1561 L.

When it comes to payload, Peugeot Traveller convincingly takes the win – 914 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 433 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Peugeot Traveller proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Peugeot Traveller is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £34,800

Peugeot Traveller

Price : 34800 - 52200 £
Body Type : Bus
Engine Type : Electric, Diesel
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 136 - 180 HP
Consumption L/100km : 7 - 7.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km : 24.3 - 25 kWh
Electric Range : 217 - 351 km
Seats : 8
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 10.6 - 14.2 s
Model Year : 2024 - 2025
Max Speed : 130 - 185 km/h
Torque : 270 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 4
Doors : 5
Model : Traveller
Modell : e-Traveller L2 (50 kWh), e-Traveller L2 (75 kWh), e-Traveller L3 (50 kWh), e-Traveller L3 (75 kWh), Traveller L2 Diesel 180, Traveller L3 Diesel 180
CO2 Efficiency Class : A, G
Trim Level : Active, Allure, Active EAT8, Allure EAT8
Power kW : 100 - 132 kW
co2 : 0 - 188 g/km
Engine capacity : 2184 cm3
Curb weight : 1953 - 2240 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 70 L
Trunk capacity : 1624 - 2011 L
Length : 4983 - 5333 mm
Width : 1920 mm
Height : 1890 mm
Brand : Peugeot
Max trunk capacity : 2700 - 3300 L
Payload : 850 - 914 kg

details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands out with its elegant and sleek design, capturing attention on the road with its refined aesthetics. Inside, it offers a well-crafted and comfortable cabin, providing a pleasurable driving experience marked by quality materials and advanced features. The car's performance is reliable and smooth, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and long-distance journeys.

details

Peugeot Traveller

The Traveller captivates with its refined blend of comfort and versatility, making it an ideal choice for both family adventures and professional needs. Its spacious interior accommodates a remarkable range of passenger and cargo configurations, ensuring flexibility for any journey. With an emphasis on safety and modern features, the Traveller delivers a remarkable driving experience that caters to diverse lifestyles.

details

@ media.stellantis.com

@ media.stellantis.com

@ media.stellantis.com

@ media.stellantis.com

Similar Comparisons

Citroen Spacetourer

Peugeot Traveller

In the battle between the Citroen Spacetourer and the Peugeot Traveller, each offers a compelling option for families and travelers requiring ample space and comfort. The Spacetourer impresses with its quirky design and flexible seating configurations that can accommodate up to nine persons, while the Traveller presents a more upscale feel with its luxurious interior finishes and advanced connectivity features. Both models share robust engine options and smooth driving dynamics, but your choice might ultimately hinge on aesthetic preference and brand loyalty.

Ford Tourneo Custom

Peugeot Traveller

When comparing the Ford Tourneo Custom and the Peugeot Traveller, it becomes clear that both vehicles excel in space and comfort, making them ideal choices for families or businesses on the move. The Tourneo Custom stands out with its powerful engine options and impressive towing capacity, while the Traveller impresses with its stylish design and advanced tech features. Ultimately, the decision may come down to personal preference in aesthetics and driving experience, as both models offer a strong balance of practicality and versatility.

Mazda 3 Sedan

Peugeot Traveller

Costs and Consumption
Price 25000 - 34200 £	Price 34800 - 52200 £
Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.1 L	Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 24.3 - 25 kWh
Electric Range -	Electric Range 217 - 351 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 123 - 135 g/km	co2 0 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 51 L	Fuel tank capacity 70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Sedan	Body Type Bus
Seats 5	Seats 8
Doors 4	Doors 5
Curb weight 1420 - 1492 kg	Curb weight 1953 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity 450 L	Trunk capacity 1624 - 2011 L
Length 4660 mm	Length 4983 - 5333 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1920 mm
Height 1440 mm	Height 1890 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 2700 - 3300 L
Payload 467 - 481 kg	Payload 850 - 914 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Electric, Diesel
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 136 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.6 - 14.2 s
Max Speed 203 - 216 km/h	Max Speed 130 - 185 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 270 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 100 - 132 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 2184 cm3