Compare performance (258 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (38,500 £ vs 50,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Saloon or Ford Transit Custom Bus?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda 6 Saloon is markedly cheaper – starting at 38,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Bus costs 50,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,311 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda 6 Saloon is visibly more efficient: consuming 16.5 kWh/100km compared to 22.3 kWh/100km for the Ford Transit Custom Bus. That’s a difference of about 5.8 kWh/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers moderately more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers significantly more torque with 630 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
The Mazda 6 Saloon is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
9
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Ford
|