Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda 6 Saloon vs Mercedes EQT comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (38,500 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Saloon or Mercedes EQT?
Mazda 6 Saloon vs Mercedes EQT: Key differences
6 Saloon
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQT is visibly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Mazda 6 Saloon costs 38,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,711 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda 6 Saloon is slightly more efficient: consuming 16.5 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers significantly more range – reaching up to 552 km, about 274 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EQT
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers substantially more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 6 Saloon is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mazda 6 Saloon is visibly faster – reaching 175 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 43 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda 6 Saloon delivers noticeably more torque with 320 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 75 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is marginally lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,027 kg. The difference is around 102 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers markedly more boot space – 551 L compared to 336 L. That’s a difference of about 215 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQT offers substantially more capacity – up to 1,979 L, about 905 L more than the Mazda 6 Saloon.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries visibly more – 531 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 171 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda 6 Saloon is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £38,500
Mazda 6 Saloon
Mazda 6 Saloon
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda 6 Saloon
The Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Mazda 6 Saloon
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.