VS

Mercedes EQV vs VW Transporter Transporter comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 286 HP), boot space and price (50,700 £ vs 37,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQV or VW Transporter Transporter?

Mercedes EQV vs VW Transporter Transporter: Key differences

Mercedes EQV

  • marginally more electric range

VW Transporter Transporter

  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW Transporter Transporter is visibly cheaper – starting at 37,500 £ , while the Mercedes EQV costs 50,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,232 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the VW Transporter Transporter is markedly more efficient: consuming 21.9 kWh/100km compared to 27.1 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQV. That’s a difference of about 5.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQV offers marginally more range – reaching up to 364 km, about 33 km more than the VW Transporter Transporter.

Transporter Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Transporter Transporter offers visibly more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Transporter Transporter is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mercedes EQV takes 10.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the VW Transporter Transporter is barely faster – reaching 150 km/h, while the Mercedes EQV tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Transporter Transporter delivers a bit more torque with 415 Nm compared to 365 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

EQV

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mercedes EQV offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, VW Transporter Transporter is clearly lighter – 1,872 kg compared to 2,666 kg. The difference is around 794 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Transporter Transporter carries markedly more – 1,259 kg compared to 834 kg. That’s a difference of about 425 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Transporter Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,500
Transporter Transporter

VW Transporter Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 286 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 56 - 331 km
Mercedes EQV
VW Transporter Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQV

The Mercedes EQV is a serene electric people‑mover that wraps practical interior space in true Mercedes luxury, turning long trips into a first‑class commute. It’s perfect for families and executives who want silent, comfortable transport with a premium feel, and it manages to be both sensible and a little bit smug in the best possible way.

details

VW Transporter Transporter

The VW Transporter is the workhorse of the modern tradesman, blending practical cleverness with a cabin that's actually pleasant to spend a long day in. It may not steal the style spotlight, but its unshowy durability, clever load solutions and easy-to-live-with character make it a sensible pick for businesses and weekend projects alike.

details
Mercedes EQV
VW Transporter Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
50,700 - 54,400 £
Price
37,500 - 60,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
27.1 - 27.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
244 - 364 km
Electric Range
56 - 331 km
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 63.8 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 220 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
6
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
2,666 - 2,863 kg
Curb weight
1,872 - 2,462 kg
Trunk capacity
1,030 - 1,410 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
5,140 - 5,370 mm
Length
5,050 - 5,450 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Width
2,032 mm
Height
1,920 - 1,923 mm
Height
1,966 - 1,985 mm
Max trunk capacity
4,630 - 5,010 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
637 - 834 kg
Payload
755 - 1,259 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
110 - 286 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.3 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 16.9 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
112 - 150 km/h
Torque
365 Nm
Torque
310 - 415 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
81 - 210 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.