VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Rolls-Royce Phantom comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 571 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 445,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or Rolls-Royce Phantom?

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: Key differences

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • barely lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Rolls-Royce Phantom

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marco Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes Marco Polo is significantly cheaper – starting at 57,500 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Phantom costs 445,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 388,229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Marco Polo uses 7.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Phantom with 15.5 L/100km. The difference is about 8.1 L/100km.

Phantom

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers considerably more power – delivering 571 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 334 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Mercedes Marco Polo takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Phantom delivers significantly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Rolls-Royce Phantom offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Marco Polo is barely lighter – 2,450 kg compared to 2,560 kg. The difference is around 110 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers moderately more boot space – 670 L compared to 548 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries markedly more – 650 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 210 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Marco Polo holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £57,500
Marco Polo

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • Engine Type Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Mercedes Marco Polo
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details

Rolls-Royce Phantom

The Phantom stands as the epitome of luxury and craftsmanship, effortlessly merging opulence with unparalleled performance. With its iconic design and attention to detail, this flagship sedan commands respect on the road while cocooning its passengers in sumptuous comfort. Every journey in the Phantom is an experience, where timeless elegance meets cutting-edge technology.

details
Mercedes Marco Polo
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption

Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Price
445,700 - 514,300 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
15.5 - 15.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
351 - 361 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Curb weight
2,560 - 2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
548 L
Length
5,140 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
2,018 mm
Height
1,975 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
390 - 440 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
571 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
420 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.