Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes Marco Polo vs VW Caddy Compact Van - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (237 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (57500 £ vs 25800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or VW Caddy Compact Van?
Caddy Compact Van
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Caddy Compact Van has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25800 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31664 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Caddy Compact Van manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.40 L. The difference is about 6.90 L per 100 km.
Caddy Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo has a noticeable edge – offering 237 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes Marco Polo performs somewhat better – reaching 220 km/h, while the VW Caddy Compact Van tops out at 186 km/h. The difference is around 34 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes Marco Polo pulls distinct stronger with 500 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm difference.
Caddy Compact Van
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mercedes Marco Polo offers clearly more seating capacity – 4 vs 2.
In curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is convincingly lighter – 1442 kg compared to 2450 kg. The difference is around 1008 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Marco Polo performs noticeable better – up to 4630 L, which is about 930 L more than the VW Caddy Compact Van.
When it comes to payload, VW Caddy Compact Van somewhat takes the win – 759 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The VW Caddy Compact Van is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes Marco Polo
VW Caddy Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,800
VW Caddy Compact Van
Mercedes Marco Polo
The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.
detailsVW Caddy Compact Van
The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
Mercedes Marco Polo
VW Caddy Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
57500 - 82600 £
|
Price
25800 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
194 - 218 g/km
|
co2
11 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2450 - 2545 kg
|
Curb weight
1442 - 1818 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
670 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5140 mm
|
Length
4500 - 4853 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1855 mm
|
|
Height
1975 mm
|
Height
1819 - 1823 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
4630 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 3700 L
|
|
Payload
555 - 650 kg
|
Payload
628 - 759 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1950 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
VW
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes Marco Polo have?
The Mercedes Marco Polo is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.