VS

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • significantly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Eclipse Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is substantially cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 234,266 £.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers significantly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 382 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers substantially more torque with 900 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm more.

Eclipse Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is noticeably lighter – 1,922 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 738 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers only slightly more boot space – 555 L compared to 545 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries substantially more – 840 kg compared to 413 kg. That’s a difference of about 427 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 615 - 627 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Phantom
VS
The Rolls-Royce Cullinan and the Rolls-Royce Phantom are two expressions of ultimate luxury: the Cullinan delivers SUV practicality and a commanding presence with genuine off‑road ability, while the Phantom is the definitive full‑size saloon built around serene, chauffeur‑focused comfort and …
Ford Transit Connect
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Transit Connect or the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.

details
mmd_22_ecpih_ext_komp_3_4_front_titan_weiss_dscf0844_low
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug in Hybrid 42_low
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug in Hybrid 30_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Paweł
15 Sept 2026, 18:08:28

After four years and 60,000 km without the slightest failure — manual gearbox.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jose
11 Apr 2026, 22:56:06

More style and dynamics, a better warranty — and much more.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
serpimg_Pd0UC9

Reviews Rolls-Royce Cullinan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Honda ZR-V
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Honda ZR-V and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. While the ZR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Eclipse Cross stands out with its sharp styling and advanced technology. …
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross and Suzuki S-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross both stand out with unique offerings. The CX-30 impresses with its sophisticated interior, agile handling, and strong fuel efficiency, appealing to those who value a premium feel. On the other hand, the …
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross and Suzuki Vitara each offer unique strengths that cater to diverse driver preferences. The Eclipse Cross impresses with its striking design and advanced infotainment features, while the Vitara is celebrated for its robust …
Toyota Land Cruiser
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
VS
The Toyota Land Cruiser and Rolls-Royce Cullinan compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Tesla Model Y
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Rolls-Royce Cullinan compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lamborghini Urus
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the Lamborghini Urus and Rolls-Royce Cullinan represent the epitome of power and opulence. The Urus, with its blistering speed and aggressive Italian design, offers a thrilling drive with practicality for everyday use. Contrastingly, the Cullinan exudes elegance with …
Porsche Cayenne
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
VS
Porsche Cayenne and Rolls-Royce Cullinan go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
615 - 627 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,922 - 1,950 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
545 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,908 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 - 413 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
218 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
160 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Rolls-Royce
Is the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.