VS

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Lynk & Co 08 – Which car suits you better?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mitsubishi Outlander or Lynk & Co 08 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Outlander has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42800 £, while the Lynk & Co 08 costs 48000 £. That’s a price difference of around 5147 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Lynk & Co 08 with 0.90 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Lynk & Co 08 performs significantly better – achieving up to 200 km, about 115 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 08 has a somewhat edge – offering 349 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 08 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.70 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.90 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Lynk & Co 08 performs to a small extent better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers significantly more room – 495 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 495 L.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi Outlander proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi Outlander is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,800
default

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.80 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 85 km
details

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1)
rate

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details

Lynk & Co 08

The Lynk & Co 08 represents a bold leap in automotive design, merging a sleek and modern exterior with a spacious and tech-savvy interior that caters to the needs of contemporary drivers. Its innovative approach to connectivity and user experience sets it apart in a crowded market, offering drivers an unparalleled level of interaction and customization. With a strong focus on sustainability, this model features advanced hybrid technology, underscoring Lynk & Co's commitment to eco-friendly driving solutions.

details

Top Car Comparisons

@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The BYD Seal U feels like a sleek, tech‑forward EV with impressive performance-to-price ratio, while the Lynk & Co 08 plays the role of bold, spacious SUV that prioritizes comfort and presence. If you want sporty agility and cutting‑edge battery tech, go Seal U; if you need family practicality, …
ZEEKR 7X
Lynk & Co 08
VS
ZEEKR 7X arrives like a tech-startup in SUV clothing — taut lines, a minimalist interior and a cockpit that screams "future", while the Lynk & Co 08 plays the confident road mate with chunkier styling, roomier practicality and a comfort-first setup. On the road the ZEEKR feels sharper and more …
Mitsubishi Outlander
Lynk & Co 08

Costs and Consumption
Price
42800 - 51000 £
Price
48000 - 51400 £
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Electric Range
200 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
19 g/km
co2
-
Fuel tank capacity
53 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
Curb weight
-
Trunk capacity
495 L
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
4719 mm
Length
4820 mm
Width
1862 mm
Width
-
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
Height
1690 mm
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
545 - 595 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
-
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
306 HP
Power HP
349 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
Max Speed
170 km/h
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
225 kW
Power kW
257 kW
Engine capacity
2360 cm3
Engine capacity
1499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Lynk & Co

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the head-to-head comparison of the Volvo XC60 and Lynk & Co 08, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table. The Volvo XC60 stands out with its time-tested reputation for safety and luxury, offering a refined driving experience and robust build quality. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 08, …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
Lynk & Co 08
VS
Skoda Kodiaq and Lynk & Co 08 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Lynk & Co 01 and Lynk & Co 08 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus RX
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Lexus RX and Lynk & Co 08 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan X-Trail
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander stand out with their distinct features and capabilities. The X-Trail boasts a spacious interior and advanced safety technology, making it an excellent choice for families, while the Outlander impresses with its …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Lynk & Co 08 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Rafale
Lynk & Co 08
VS
Unsure whether the Renault Rafale or the Lynk & Co 08 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
Lynk & Co 08
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Lynk & Co 08 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Outlander have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.