Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison
Compare performance (196 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Astra Sports Tourer
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 245,409 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer uses 2.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 13.7 L/100km.
Cullinan
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers substantially more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 196 HP. That’s roughly 404 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer takes 7.7 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 540 Nm more.
Astra Sports Tourer
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer is considerably lighter – 1,438 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,222 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer offers very slightly more boot space – 597 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries substantially more – 840 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 338 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,000
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
The Opel Astra Sports Tourer blends family-friendly practicality with a sleek, grown-up wagon silhouette that manages to be both useful and unexpectedly stylish. It’s an easy car to live with — comfortable, well put together and clever with space — a sensible choice for buyers who want everyday versatility without fuss.
details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.
details
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,000 - 39,600 £
|
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
83 - 445 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 132 g/km
|
co2
363 - 380 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,438 - 1,765 kg
|
Curb weight
2,660 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 - 597 L
|
Trunk capacity
555 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
2,000 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
434 - 502 kg
|
Payload
840 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 196 HP
|
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
|
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
|
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.