Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs VW Polo – Which car suits you better?
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or VW Polo?
Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW Polo has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £. That’s a price difference of around 11456 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
Polo
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo has a distinct edge – offering 207 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs evident better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 68 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW Polo pulls noticeable stronger with 320 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 115 Nm difference.
Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Polo is distinct lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 367 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers distinct more room – 480 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Arkana performs somewhat better – up to 1263 L, which is about 138 L more than the VW Polo.
When it comes to payload, VW Polo minimal takes the win – 457 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
Who wins the race?
The VW Polo proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW Polo is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £17,000
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Polo
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
VW Polo
The Polo is a small car with surprisingly grown-up refinement, delivering comfortable packaging, crisp handling and a build quality that punches above its class. For buyers who want a practical, fuss-free hatch that still feels a little premium, it’s a sensible, slightly cheeky choice you’ll enjoy every day.
details
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
Renault Arkana
VW Polo
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
Price
17000 - 30400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
116 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
Curb weight
1143 - 1378 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
4568 mm
|
Length
4074 mm
|
|
Width
1821 mm
|
Width
1751 mm
|
|
Height
1576 mm
|
Height
1431 - 1451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1125 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
432 - 457 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
Max Speed
171 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
VW
|
What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?
The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.