Two cars, one duel: Skoda Kamiq meets VW Polo.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the automotive world, the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Polo are significant contenders in the compact vehicle segment. Both cars come from the Volkswagen Group, but they offer distinct experiences to suit different needs. In this comparative article, we dive into the technical specifics and innovations that separate these two models.
The Skoda Kamiq presents itself as a compact SUV, boasting a larger frame with dimensions of 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height. Its additional size compared to the Polo provides a more commanding road presence, which is typical of an SUV.
On the other hand, the VW Polo is a quintessential hatchback, characterized by a sportier, more compact design. At 4074 mm long, 1751 mm wide, and height options of 1451 mm or 1431 mm, it offers agility and easy maneuverability, especially suited for urban environments.
When it comes to engine options, both the Kamiq and the Polo offer versatile petrol-engine choices. The Kamiq engines range from 95 HP to 150 HP with torque between 175 Nm and 250 Nm. You can opt for a manual or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, making it suitable for a variety of driving preferences.
Similarly, the Polo offers engine outputs from 80 HP up to a performance-tuned 207 HP. The torque ranges from 93 Nm to 320 Nm, and like the Kamiq, it comes with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission options. This ensures that from everyday commuters to those seeking more spirited drives, there's something for everyone.
Fuel consumption is a critical factor for many buyers. Both models showcase competitive efficiency, with the Kamiq offering between 5.4 and 5.7 L/100km depending on the engine. This is slightly higher than the Polo, which ranges from 5.2 to 6.5 L/100km, balancing performance and economy effectively.
In terms of emissions, both cars fall into the D and E CO2 efficiency classes, with the Kamiq emitting between 121 and 130 g/km and the Polo between 118 and 149 g/km, based on the engine configuration chosen.
The Kamiq, true to its SUV form, provides a generous trunk capacity of 400 L, accommodating greater load types, perfect for family trips or adventures. It comfortably seats five and has a payload capacity reaching up to 463 kg.
The Polo, slightly more compact with a 351 L trunk, still offers decent luggage space for a hatchback. With seating for five and a payload limit extending to 457 kg, it remains a practical choice for daily commuting and urban living.
Both the Skoda Kamiq and VW Polo come equipped with advanced technology features synonymous with modern driving demands. Expect touchscreen interfaces, smartphone integration via Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, and an array of advanced safety features.
The Kamiq stands out with its higher driving position, providing excellent visibility and a confident driving feel, while the Polo's tech interface leans slightly more towards sporty engagement, with access to performance metrics for enthusiast drivers.
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Polo ultimately boils down to lifestyle needs. The Kamiq, with its elevated SUV stance, is perfect for those who prioritize space and a taller driving position. Meanwhile, the Polo is an excellent choice for city dwellers who seek a balance of compact style and swift performance potential.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW Polo has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21700 £. That’s a price difference of around 4710 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Polo manages with 5.10 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo has a distinct edge – offering 207 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.10 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs barely noticeable better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Skoda Kamiq tops out at 216 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW Polo pulls evident stronger with 320 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Polo is minimal lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1231 kg. The difference is around 88 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers slightly more room – 400 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 49 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs slightly better – up to 1395 L, which is about 270 L more than the VW Polo.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq a bit takes the win – 539 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.
Overall, the VW Polo shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Polo is a small car with surprisingly grown-up refinement, delivering comfortable packaging, crisp handling and a build quality that punches above its class. For buyers who want a practical, fuss-free hatch that still feels a little premium, it’s a sensible, slightly cheeky choice you’ll enjoy every day.
details
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
Price
17000 - 30400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
116 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
Curb weight
1143 - 1378 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
4241 mm
|
Length
4074 mm
|
|
Width
1793 mm
|
Width
1751 mm
|
|
Height
1562 mm
|
Height
1431 - 1451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1125 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
432 - 457 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
171 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España