Compare performance (150 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or VW Polo?
In the automotive world, the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Polo are significant contenders in the compact vehicle segment. Both cars come from the Volkswagen Group, but they offer distinct experiences to suit different needs. In this comparative article, we dive into the technical specifics and innovations that separate these two models.
The Skoda Kamiq presents itself as a compact SUV, boasting a larger frame with dimensions of 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height. Its additional size compared to the Polo provides a more commanding road presence, which is typical of an SUV.
On the other hand, the VW Polo is a quintessential hatchback, characterized by a sportier, more compact design. At 4074 mm long, 1751 mm wide, and height options of 1451 mm or 1431 mm, it offers agility and easy maneuverability, especially suited for urban environments.
When it comes to engine options, both the Kamiq and the Polo offer versatile petrol-engine choices. The Kamiq engines range from 95 HP to 150 HP with torque between 175 Nm and 250 Nm. You can opt for a manual or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, making it suitable for a variety of driving preferences.
Similarly, the Polo offers engine outputs from 80 HP up to a performance-tuned 207 HP. The torque ranges from 93 Nm to 320 Nm, and like the Kamiq, it comes with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission options. This ensures that from everyday commuters to those seeking more spirited drives, there's something for everyone.
Fuel consumption is a critical factor for many buyers. Both models showcase competitive efficiency, with the Kamiq offering between 5.4 and 5.7 L/100km depending on the engine. This is slightly higher than the Polo, which ranges from 5.2 to 6.5 L/100km, balancing performance and economy effectively.
In terms of emissions, both cars fall into the D and E CO2 efficiency classes, with the Kamiq emitting between 121 and 130 g/km and the Polo between 118 and 149 g/km, based on the engine configuration chosen.
The Kamiq, true to its SUV form, provides a generous trunk capacity of 400 L, accommodating greater load types, perfect for family trips or adventures. It comfortably seats five and has a payload capacity reaching up to 463 kg.
The Polo, slightly more compact with a 351 L trunk, still offers decent luggage space for a hatchback. With seating for five and a payload limit extending to 457 kg, it remains a practical choice for daily commuting and urban living.
Both the Skoda Kamiq and VW Polo come equipped with advanced technology features synonymous with modern driving demands. Expect touchscreen interfaces, smartphone integration via Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, and an array of advanced safety features.
The Kamiq stands out with its higher driving position, providing excellent visibility and a confident driving feel, while the Polo's tech interface leans slightly more towards sporty engagement, with access to performance metrics for enthusiast drivers.
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Polo ultimately boils down to lifestyle needs. The Kamiq, with its elevated SUV stance, is perfect for those who prioritize space and a taller driving position. Meanwhile, the Polo is an excellent choice for city dwellers who seek a balance of compact style and swift performance potential.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW Polo is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,010 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Polo uses 5.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo offers visibly more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Polo delivers markedly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is barely lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,231 kg. The difference is around 88 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers somewhat more boot space – 400 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 49 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries moderately more – 539 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.
The VW Polo holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.
details
The Polo is a well-built, comfortable hatchback that blends a refined cabin and composed manners into a compact package. It's easy to live with day to day, offering sensible space, tidy controls and reassuring quality that make it a practical choice for city or longer trips.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
116 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
Width
1,751 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
432 - 457 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España