VS

Skoda Kamiq vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or VW T-Roc?

Skoda Kamiq vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq vs VW T-Roc: the real-world matchup

The Skoda Kamiq and the VW T-Roc aim at similar needs but deliver them with different personalities, making Skoda Kamiq VS VW T-Roc a genuinely useful comparison. The Skoda Kamiq plays the pragmatic card: easy to live with, roomy for its size, and notably frugal. The VW T-Roc feels a class up in polish, with a calmer, more insulated drive and a cabin that looks and feels more premium. There is a price step to reach the T-Roc’s extra sheen, and options can push it higher. Deciding between them is about how you drive and what you value day to day, not a spec-sheet arm wrestle.

T-Roc

Driving character and comfort

The Skoda Kamiq is set up for relaxed progress: light steering, an easygoing gait, and a suspension tune that favors comfort over cornering heroics. Push it and you’ll notice more body movement, but on a commute it’s unfussy and settled. The VW T-Roc feels more planted and mature on a fast road, with better noise suppression and an optional adaptive setup that widens the comfort-to-control spread. Choose sensible wheel sizes on the T-Roc to keep the ride supple; the biggest rims add thump over sharp edges. Both pair smoothly with a dual-clutch gearbox in steady driving, though the Skoda’s can fidget at parking speeds while the VW’s can hesitate if you jab the throttle.

Kamiq

Cabin feel and controls

Inside, the Skoda Kamiq keeps things straightforward, with proper climate knobs and clear menus that are easy to use on the move. Materials are robust rather than plush, and the infotainment can be a beat behind with the odd smartphone quirk. The VW T-Roc counters with a noticeably richer look and touch, from soft surfaces to neatly integrated displays and welcome returns of real steering-wheel buttons. Its climate is managed by touch sliders and a multifunction rotary controller that work once learned, but they demand more attention initially. If you prize tactile simplicity, the Kamiq’s approach is friendlier; if you want a more upmarket ambiance, the T-Roc delivers.

T-Roc

Space and everyday practicality

The Skoda Kamiq majors on clever space: rear legroom is excellent for a small SUV, doors open wide, and family kit finds handy homes in the cabin. Its boot is usefully shaped, though without the optional variable floor you get a step and the 60:40 rear bench isn’t the most flexible. The VW T-Roc offers more elbow room and a cargo area that’s easier to configure, with a variable floor and a 40:20:40 backrest for long items. That split makes ski trips or flat-pack runs far simpler without sacrificing two rear seats. There’s no sliding rear bench on either, and with the T-Roc’s floor in the lowest position an inner load lip remains, but overall it’s the more versatile hauler.

Kamiq

City ease vs motorway manners

In town, the Skoda Kamiq’s lighter feel, generous glass area and tidy footprint make squeezing through gaps and slotting into tight bays almost stress-free. The VW T-Roc is still compact enough for the city, but feels a touch broader; its cameras and sensors take the strain in crowded car parks. On a long run the T-Roc settles into an impressively quiet lope, shrugging off wind and road roar and tracking straight with minimal effort. The Skoda Kamiq is stable and pleasantly quiet for its class, and its thrifty nature stretches fuel stops, but you’ll hear a little more texture from the road. Off the line the Kamiq can feel a shade more eager, while the T-Roc trades a hint of sprint for superior cruising calm.

T-Roc

Costs, efficiency and who each car suits

If you’re watching upfront and running costs, the Skoda Kamiq typically lands lighter on the wallet and sips less in everyday driving. The VW T-Roc asks more but gives back in perceived quality, long-distance hush and a richer set of assistance tech, especially as you climb trims. Ergonomically, the Kamiq’s physical controls are blissfully simple; the T-Roc’s tech feels newer and classier but its touch sliders won’t please everyone. City-based families and pragmatic commuters will click with the Kamiq’s ease of use, big rear seat and sensible efficiency. Frequent motorway travelers and buyers who value cabin polish and flexible cargo solutions will feel better served by the T-Roc. Keep those priorities in mind as you dive into the technical comparison next to see which one lines up best with your life.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kamiq is moderately cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,170 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kamiq uses 5.3 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 250 Nm.

Kamiq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is moderately lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 234 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers clearly more boot space – 400 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 116 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries very slightly more – 539 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kamiq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,300
Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
details
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Picking between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Kamiq is largely a choice between a sportier, style-led crossover and a more practical, spacious, value-focused one. Both share similar underpinnings and efficient engines, but the Arona leans toward engaging looks and driving feel while the Kamiq …
Skoda Kamiq
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Small crossover showdown: the Skoda Kamiq and Toyota Yaris Cross both promise compact-SUV practicality, but they take very different routes — the Kamiq leans on clever space, solid build and punchy petrols, while the Yaris Cross trades on hybrid frugality and nimble city manners. We’ll compare …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
121 - 128 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
400 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,793 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 539 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kamiq have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.