In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
The compact SUV segment continues to grow in popularity, and two notable contenders vying for attention are the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, comfort, and technology, but which one comes out on top? In this comparison, we delve into their technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance to help you make an informed decision.
Starting with exterior design, both the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Roc embody the rugged appeal of an SUV while maintaining a compact footprint. The Kamiq measures 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height, offering a sleeker profile. In contrast, the T-Roc is slightly larger, spanning between 4236 mm and 4271 mm in length, with a width of 1811 to 1819 mm and a height of 1527 to 1584 mm, depending on the variant. This size difference affects their road presence and interior space slightly.
Under the hood, both models provide a range of petrol engine options that appeal to different driving preferences. The Skoda Kamiq is available with three petrol engines that produce power outputs ranging from 95 HP to a robust 150 HP, coupled with a choice between manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. It achieves a respectable acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, while its fuel consumption varies from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100 km.
On the other hand, the VW T-Roc offers an even broader spectrum, with two petrol and one diesel engine option. Power outputs range from 115 HP to an impressive 300 HP, especially with the high-performance variant. The T-Roc can achieve 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, showcasing its agility. Fuel consumption for the T-Roc ranges from 4.7 to 8.5 L/100 km, depending on the engine and drivetrain configuration.
Both models provide a choice of manual and automatic transmissions. However, the T-Roc has an edge with optional all-wheel-drive configurations, enhancing its capability on various terrains. The Kamiq, with its front-wheel drive system, is designed more for urban commuting and offers less off-road capability than the T-Roc.
Inside the cabins, both SUVs are designed to comfortably seat five passengers. The Skoda Kamiq boasts a trunk capacity of 400 liters, offering practicality for daily use, while the T-Roc's trunk ranges from 284 to 445 liters, depending on the variant. Both feature high-quality materials and modern design, ensuring a comfortable ride.
In terms of technology, both vehicles come equipped with the latest infotainment systems, complete with touchscreen displays, smartphone connectivity options, and an array of safety features. The Kamiq prioritizes ease of use with its user-friendly interface, while the T-Roc offers added technology features, including premium sound systems and advanced driver-assistance systems.
Safety is a high priority for both manufacturers. The Skoda Kamiq boasts impressive safety ratings with features such as Autonomous Emergency Braking, Lane Assist, and a rear parking camera. Similarly, the T-Roc is equipped with a suite of safety technologies, including adaptive cruise control and a robust airbag system. Both models achieve good CO2 efficiency ratings, with the Kamiq classified in the D band and the T-Roc varying from D to G, indicating different environmental impacts based on engine variants.
In conclusion, choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T-Roc ultimately depends on your priorities. If you seek a compact and efficient city-oriented SUV with solid performance and practicality, the Kamiq is an excellent option. However, if you desire more power, advanced technology, and the option of all-wheel drive, the VW T-Roc stands out as the more dynamic choice. Both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, making them formidable contenders in the compact SUV market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 21700 - 31900
£
|
Price
about 23900 - 45500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
121 - 130
g/km
|
co2
125 - 194
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2 - 5
|
Curb weight
1223 - 1288
kg
|
Curb weight
1304 - 1578
kg
|
Trunk capacity
400
L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 445
L
|
Length
4241
mm
|
Length
4236 - 4271
mm
|
Width
1793
mm
|
Width
1811 - 1819
mm
|
Height
1562
mm
|
Height
1527 - 1584
mm
|
Payload
451 - 463
kg
|
Payload
368 - 509
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 300
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 12.3
s
|
Max Speed
183 - 214
km/h
|
Max Speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 221
kW
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
183 - 214
km/h
|
Top speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.