Nissan Qashqai vs VW T-Roc - Differences and prices compared

Q: How much power does the Nissan Qashqai deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Nissan Qashqai delivers up to 205 HP.

Q: How much fuel does the Nissan Qashqai use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.50 L.

Q: How big is the Nissan Qashqai overall?

Length 4425 mm, width 1835 mm, height 1625 mm – those are the dimensions of the Nissan Qashqai.

Q: Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the VW T-Roc's engine?

The VW T-Roc reaches a peak output of 150 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the VW T-Roc according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.50 L.

Q: How fast can the VW T-Roc go?

The VW T-Roc reaches up to 212 km/h.

Q: What is the VW T-Roc’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 475 L fit inside.

Q: How big is the VW T-Roc overall?

The VW T-Roc measures 4373 mm long, 1811 mm wide and 1573 mm high.

Compare performance (205 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (29600 £ vs 26400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or VW T-Roc?

scroll down

Qashqai

City swagger and long‑legged calm

The compact crossover world is all about compromise, and these two take very different approaches to the daily grind: the VW T‑Roc feels eager and alert when threading through traffic, while the Nissan Qashqai trades some of that sparkle for a more settled, confident demeanor on longer runs. One invites you to dart and flirt with tight parking spots, the other soothes you when the journey stretches beyond the city. Your commute will quickly tell you which personality fits your temperament.

T-Roc

Cabin character and creature comforts

Step inside and you get a clear sense of intent: the Qashqai wraps occupants in a calm, roomy ambience with an emphasis on comfort and uncomplicated ergonomics, whereas the T‑Roc favours a livelier, more driver‑centric layout with playful accents. Both cabins feel modern, but the tactile choices and layout will nudge you toward either relaxed practicality or a slightly sportier vibe. For everyday usability the little details — lid placements, armrest heights, and visibility — make the difference.

Qashqai

Stowage, family life and weekend plans

If you regularly haul kit, kids or awkward loads, the scale and flexibility of the space matter as much as raw volume, and that's where personalities diverge: the Qashqai leans toward family‑friendly packaging with a sense of usable, thought‑through storage, while the T‑Roc keeps things compact and tidy for those who prioritise urban lifestyle over maximum loadability. Both will serve a small family, but your packing habits and shopping list will reveal the better match. Practicality is a matter of how you live with a car day‑to‑day, not just what looks good on paper.

scroll down

T-Roc

How they steer and settle

On the move the contrast is telling: the T‑Roc is keen to turn in and rewards quick hands with a playful edge, while the Qashqai prefers to absorb the road and deliver a composed, assured ride that rewards relaxed inputs. Neither is a hardcore sports car, but one leans toward engagement and the other toward refinement — and that choice defines the emotional tone of every drive. Pick your mood and the car will follow.

Qashqai

Style, presence and personality

Design choices give away the target audience: the T‑Roc projects youth and individuality with sharper styling cues and a bolder stance, whereas the Qashqai opts for a more timeless, restrained look that will blend in gracefully over years of ownership. Which one turns heads more depends on whether you want to be noticed for flair or for understated competence. Either way, both offer distinct identities rather than being forgettable, safe choices.

T-Roc

Who should choose which path

If your life revolves around longer trips, family duties and a preference for a relaxed, roomy companion, the Qashqai will feel reassuringly sensible; if you live in the city, crave a livelier steering experience and favour a more youthful image, the T‑Roc will reward you with agility and personality. Budget, lifestyle and taste will be the deciding factors more than headline figures. Test drives will quickly show which suits the rhythm of your days.

Qashqai

Keep reading — the DriveDuel Champion awaits

Stick with us to see how these different strengths are weighed up in the full DriveDuel analysis, because the Champion reveal is coming up next and it might not be the surprise you expect.

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)

VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW T-Roc has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3167 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a noticeable edge – offering 205 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs barely noticeable better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls evident stronger with 330 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

scroll down

T-Roc

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is hardly perceptible lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 45 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers slight more room – 504 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai performs minimal better – up to 1447 L, which is about 97 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai barely noticeable takes the win – 520 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Qashqai is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Nissan Qashqai

VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption L/100km

co2

Fuel tank capacity

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Max Speed

Torque

Number of Cylinders

Power kW

Engine capacity

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Max trunk capacity

Payload

from about £29,600

Nissan Qashqai

Price : 29600 - 39900 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail : Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 140 - 205 HP
Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 6.8 L
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.6 - 10.2 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 170 - 206 km/h
Torque : 240 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3 - 4
Doors : 5
Model : Qashqai
Modell : Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T MHEV, Qashqai 1.5 e-POWER
CO2 Efficiency Class : E, C
Trim Level : Acenta, N-CONNECTA, Acenta Xtronic, N-CONNECTA Xtronic, N-CONNECTA 4x4 Xtronic, N-DESIGN Xtronic, N-DESIGN 4x4 Xtronic, Tekna Xtronic, Tekna 4x4 Xtronic, N-DESIGN, Tekna
Power kW : 103 - 151 kW
co2 : 102 - 154 g/km
Engine capacity : 1332 - 1498 cm3
Curb weight : 1420 - 1665 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 55 L
Trunk capacity : 479 - 504 L
Length : 4425 mm
Width : 1835 mm
Height : 1625 mm
Brand : Nissan
Max trunk capacity : 1422 - 1447 L
Payload : 466 - 520 kg

details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details

VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details

Top Car Comparisons

Lexus LBX

VW T-Roc

The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …

SEAT Ateca

VW T-Roc

The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …

Nissan Qashqai

VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price 29600 - 39900 £	Price 26400 - 38600 £
Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 102 - 154 g/km	co2 126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 4 - 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1420 - 1665 kg	Curb weight 1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity 479 - 504 L	Trunk capacity 284 - 475 L
Length 4425 mm	Length 4373 mm
Width 1835 mm	Width 1811 - 1828 mm
Height 1625 mm	Height 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity 1422 - 1447 L	Max trunk capacity 1350 L
Payload 466 - 520 kg	Payload 368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 205 HP	Power HP 115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 10.2 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed 170 - 206 km/h	Max Speed 196 - 212 km/h
Torque 240 - 330 Nm	Torque 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 103 - 151 kW	Power kW 85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1332 - 1498 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3