In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium interior options. Ultimately, choosing between these two best-sellers will depend on whether practicality or a dynamic driving experience takes precedence for the buyer.
The compact SUV segment has seen significant growth, with offerings that blend style, practicality, and advanced technology. Two of the most prominent models in this category are the Nissan Qashqai and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles provide a compelling mix of performance, comfort, and user-friendly features, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s take a closer look at these two SUVs.
When comparing the technical specifications of the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc, both vehicles stand out with their respective engines and drivetrain options. The Qashqai offers a range of engine types, including petrol MHEV and full hybrid options. It has power outputs ranging from 140 to 190 HP, accompanied by an efficient CO2 emission range of 116 to 154 g/km. The Qashqai's acceleration figures are competitive, with a 0-100 km/h time that can go as low as 7.9 seconds, emphasizing its sporty potential.
On the other hand, the VW T-Roc also presents a diverse selection of engines, including petrol and diesel, with power outputs between 115 and 300 HP. This means that the T-Roc can cater to a broader audience, particularly with the high-performance version. The acceleration performance is commendable, with some variants achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, making the T-Roc a potential frontrunner for those seeking speed.
Both SUVs provide front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. The Qashqai features various transmission options, including manual gearboxes and continuously variable transmission (CVT) systems, allowing drivers to choose based on their preferences for driving dynamics and fuel efficiency. Its manual transmission is noted for its smooth shifts, while the automatic options deliver seamless power delivery.
The T-Roc provides similar transmission options but adds an automated dual-clutch system, which enhances the driving experience through rapid gear changes. This feature is particularly appealing to those who enjoy the engagement of sportier driving without sacrificing comfort.
Inside, the Nissan Qashqai boasts a slightly larger trunk capacity, offering 504 liters compared to the T-Roc's maximum of 445 liters. This makes the Qashqai a more practical choice for families or those needing extra cargo space. Both vehicles are equipped to seat up to five passengers comfortably, but the rear seats in the Qashqai might offer slightly more legroom, enhancing passenger comfort on longer journeys.
In terms of materials and user interface, the T-Roc showcases VW's renowned build quality, with a modern aesthetic and intuitive infotainment technology. The digital cockpit feature is a highlight, providing customizable displays that keep all necessary information in the driver’s line of sight.
Fuel efficiency is crucial for any SUV buyer, and here both models perform commendably. The Qashqai achieves consumption figures as low as 5.1 L/100 km in its hybrid configurations, while the T-Roc offers competitive figures, with the most efficient versions clocking in around 4.7 L/100 km. Depending on your driving style and fuel preferences, both SUVs can provide economic benefits, with the T-Roc edging ahead in some diesel variants.
Ultimately, the choice between the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc will depend on personal preferences and requirements. The Qashqai excels in practicality, comfort, and hybrid efficiency, making it ideal for those seeking a reliable family SUV. In contrast, the T-Roc captures attention with its sporty performance, advanced tech, and design flair, appealing to drivers who prioritize style and driving enjoyment.
Both SUVs represent the best of their respective brands and will meet various consumer needs. Therefore, test-driving both models will be advised to truly appreciate what they offer and make an informed decision based on individual expectations.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 29300 - 42400
£
|
Price
about 23900 - 45500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
116 - 154
g/km
|
co2
125 - 194
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2 - 5
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665
kg
|
Curb weight
1304 - 1578
kg
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504
L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 445
L
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Length
4236 - 4271
mm
|
Width
1835
mm
|
Width
1811 - 1819
mm
|
Height
1625
mm
|
Height
1527 - 1584
mm
|
Payload
466 - 520
kg
|
Payload
368 - 509
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
140 - 190
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 300
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 10.2
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 12.3
s
|
Max Speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
Max Speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
Torque
240 - 330
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
103 - 140
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 221
kW
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1497
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
170 - 206
km/h
|
Top speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.