In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its stylish Scandinavian design and commitment to safety, offering a serene driving experience complemented by a high-quality interior. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc impresses with its sportier dynamics and customizable features, appealing to drivers who prioritize a more engaging ride. Ultimately, the choice between the XC40 and T-Roc boils down to personal preferences in style, comfort, and driving experience.
As the compact SUV segment continues to grow in popularity, two of the standout models on the market are the Volvo XC40 and the VW T-Roc. Each offers a unique blend of style, performance, and technology, but how do they stack up against each other? This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of both vehicles to help you make an informed decision.
The Volvo XC40 is powered by a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder petrol mild-hybrid engine, delivering either 163 HP or 197 HP, with 265 Nm to 300 Nm of torque, depending on the variant. This results in a respectable acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 8.6 seconds for the lower power model and just 7.6 seconds for the more powerful version. The automatic transmission paired with front-wheel drive allows for smooth shifts and responsive handling.
On the other hand, the VW T-Roc offers a more diverse engine lineup with options including both petrol and diesel variants. With power ratings ranging from 115 HP to a robust 300 HP, the T-Roc accommodates a range of driving preferences. Acceleration figures vary significantly, with the fastest 0-100 km/h time sitting at just 4.9 seconds for the 300 HP variant, illustrating the T-Roc's performance potential.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Volvo XC40 shows a solid consumption figure of approximately 6.5 L/100 km. This efficiency, combined with its 54-liter fuel tank capacity, provides an adequate driving range for urban and longer journeys.
The VW T-Roc takes the lead in this category, boasting various petrol and diesel options with consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km for the diesel engines. With a fuel tank capacity of either 50 or 55 liters, the T-Roc offers practicality and extended journeys without frequent refueling stops.
Inside, the Volvo XC40 features a spacious and luxurious cabin designed to accommodate up to five passengers comfortably. With 452 liters of trunk space, it strikes a balance between practicality and comfort, making it a great choice for families or those with active lifestyles.
The VW T-Roc, while slightly smaller with a trunk capacity of 445 liters, still hosts an inviting interior that can seat up to five passengers. With its more compact dimensions, the T-Roc is designed for nimble city driving without sacrificing comfort on longer trips.
Volvo’s reputation for safety shines through in the XC40, which is equipped with cutting-edge safety features such as advanced driver assistance systems, blind-spot monitoring, and city safety technologies. The interior is tech-savvy, featuring a large touchscreen infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with mobile devices.
The VW T-Roc also comes with a strong suite of safety features and boasts innovative technology such as the Volkswagen Digital Cockpit, allowing for customizable driver displays. Features like adaptive cruise control and lane assist enhance the driving experience, ensuring a high level of safety during your travels.
Ultimately, the decision between the Volvo XC40 and the VW T-Roc will depend on individual preferences. If luxury, safety, and a superior interior experience are your priorities, the XC40 offers these in spades. However, if you're looking for a range of engine options, impressive fuel efficiency, and stylish tech integrations, the T-Roc will likely capture your interest. Both models showcase their respective brands' strengths, making them formidable contenders in the compact SUV marketplace.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 36400 - 46000
£
|
Price
about 23900 - 45500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
147 - 148
g/km
|
co2
125 - 194
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
54
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2 - 5
|
Curb weight
1688
kg
|
Curb weight
1304 - 1578
kg
|
Trunk capacity
452
L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 445
L
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Length
4236 - 4271
mm
|
Width
1863
mm
|
Width
1811 - 1819
mm
|
Height
1652
mm
|
Height
1527 - 1584
mm
|
Payload
532
kg
|
Payload
368 - 509
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
163 - 197
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 300
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 12.3
s
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Max Speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
Torque
265 - 300
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
120 - 145
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 221
kW
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
Top speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.