@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ Volvo Cars
VS

CUPRA Terramar vs Volvo XC40 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether CUPRA Terramar or Volvo XC40 fits your lifestyle better.

Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Introduction

As the automotive market continues to evolve, the demand for versatile and efficient SUVs has skyrocketed. Two noteworthy contenders vying for attention in this segment are the CUPRA Terramar and the Volvo XC40. Both models offer a unique blend of performance, technology, and practicality. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of these two SUVs, examining their technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Design and Comfort

The CUPRA Terramar embodies a sporty and aggressive aesthetic, featuring a bold front grille and sharp lines that emphasize its athletic nature. Measuring 4519 mm in length and 1869 mm in width, the Terramar is designed to command attention on the road. It offers a spacious interior with seating for five and a trunk capacity of 450 liters, making it a practical choice for families and adventurers alike.

In contrast, the Volvo XC40 presents a more understated elegance, with a design that emphasizes Scandinavian simplicity and functionality. Slightly smaller at 4425 mm long and 1863 mm wide, the XC40 provides a cozy cabin that offers a similar seating capacity and a trunk that can accommodate up to 452 liters. Both vehicles prioritize driver and passenger comfort, but the Terramar leans slightly towards a sportier driving experience.

Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Performance and Engine Options

Under the hood, the CUPRA Terramar boasts a diverse array of engine options. It offers an exhilarating lineup, including a 150 HP petrol variant, a potent 265 HP petrol engine, and a 272 HP plug-in hybrid version. The hybrid variant can achieve a remarkable 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 5.3 seconds, while its electric range reaches up to 120 km, making it a viable option for daily commutes without relying solely on gasoline.

The Volvo XC40, on the other hand, offers a selection of petrol MHEV engines with outputs ranging from 163 to 197 HP. While it provides commendable performance, with a 0-100 km/h sprint taking 8.6 seconds for the base engine and 7.6 seconds for the more powerful variant, it falls short of the electrifying acceleration numbers offered by the Terramar. However, the XC40 does offer a respectable level of efficiency, with a consumption rate of approximately 6.5 L/100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Technology and Innovations

Both vehicles are equipped with cutting-edge technology, enhancing the driving experience and ensuring safety on the road. The CUPRA Terramar comes loaded with advanced infotainment options, featuring a user-friendly interface and connectivity options such as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The integration of driver-assistance features, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance, enhances its appeal for tech-savvy drivers.

Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 is renowned for its commitment to safety and technological innovation. The XC40 includes an array of safety features such as automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring, which contribute to its high safety ratings. Its infotainment system, powered by Google's Android operating system, provides seamless connectivity and access to various apps and services, creating a more integrated and user-friendly environment.

Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to efficiency, the CUPRA Terramar shines with its hybrid offerings, particularly the plug-in variant, which emits just 10 g/km of CO2, making it an excellent choice for environmentally conscious consumers. Even the petrol-only engines have respectable consumption figures, with the 150 HP variant achieving a rate of 6.1 L/100 km.

In comparison, the Volvo XC40, boasting a CO2 efficiency rating of E, has emissions around 147-148 g/km, which may not appeal as much to eco-aware drivers. While its fuel tank capacity of 54 liters allows for extended travel before refueling, the XC40 does not match the efficiency of the hybrid options found in the Terramar.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion

In summary, both the CUPRA Terramar and the Volvo XC40 are impressive SUVs that cater to different customer needs. The Terramar stands out with its sporty performance, hybrid technology, and advanced features, making it a compelling choice for those seeking an exciting driving experience. Conversely, the Volvo XC40 excels in safety and practicality, appealing to consumers prioritizing a refined, comfortable ride. Ultimately, the choice between these two remarkable vehicles will depend on individual preferences and requirements in the ever-growing SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo XC40 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the CUPRA Terramar costs 36900 £. That’s a price difference of around 112 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: CUPRA Terramar manages with 6.10 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar has a distinct edge – offering 265 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the CUPRA Terramar performs noticeable better – reaching 243 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 63 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: CUPRA Terramar pulls noticeable stronger with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is minimal lighter – 1638 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.

In terms of boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers to a small extent more room – 540 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 88 L.

When it comes to payload, CUPRA Terramar minimal takes the win – 542 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the CUPRA Terramar shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,900
Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Terramar

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.1 - 8.4 L
details

CUPRA Terramar

5 (1)
rate

The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.

details
IMG_0231 @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_07_HQ @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_13_HQ @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Tavascan
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is the statement-making electric coupé-SUV — sleek, silent and quick, perfect if you want emission-free performance and a futuristic showpiece. The Cupra Terramar is the more pragmatic, sharp-edged sibling: a compact petrol/hybrid SUV with better everyday usability, lower running …
CUPRA Terramar
Volvo XC40
Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
36900 - 48500 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
6.1 - 8.4 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
139 - 191 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1638 - 1750 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
540 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4519 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1869 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1586 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
540 - 542 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
205 - 243 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
VS
CUPRA Terramar dials up the drama with razor-sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a design that shouts performance — it's the hot-hatch of the SUV world for drivers who actually enjoy twisty roads. The Hyundai Tucson, by contrast, is a sensible all‑rounder: spacious, comfortable and economical, …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
The CUPRA Terramar attacks the compact-SUV class with sharp handling, brash styling and a sporty, premium edge, while the Kia Sportage plays the sensible rival—roomier, friendlier on the wallet and loaded with mainstream tech. If you want driver-focused thrills and a head-turning look pick the …
What drivetrain options does the CUPRA Terramar have?

The CUPRA Terramar is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.