Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
CUPRA Terramar vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (272 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (36900 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Skoda Kodiaq?
Terramar
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the CUPRA Terramar costs 36900 £. That’s a price difference of around 26 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the CUPRA Terramar with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 122 km, about 4 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar has a minimal edge – offering 272 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the CUPRA Terramar performs barely noticeable better – reaching 243 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 400 Nm.
Terramar
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is barely noticeable lighter – 1638 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 46 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 370 L.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq barely noticeable takes the win – 563 kg compared to 542 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
CUPRA Terramar
5 (1 Reviews)
The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36900 - 50600 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1638 - 1904 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4519 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1869 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1586 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 243 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the CUPRA Terramar have?
The CUPRA Terramar is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.