Compare performance (272 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Skoda Kodiaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The CUPRA Terramar arrives with a sharper, more athletic poise that wants to be noticed at traffic lights, while the Skoda Kodiaq projects a calmer, assured presence that feels sensible rather than showy. Look at the lines and you can tell one is tuned for emotional appeal and the other for functional elegance. Both have personality, but they speak to different kinds of drivers — one restless, one pragmatic.
Step inside the CUPRA and the cabin feels like a sporty cockpit with supportive seats and a focus on driver engagement; the Kodiaq's interior leans toward spacious, family-friendly comfort with an uncluttered, user-first layout. Materials and fit are convincing in both, but their atmospheres differ: one emphasises excitement, the other calm. Either way, long stints won’t feel like a compromise, just a different kind of company.
For buyers who juggle school runs, weekend gear and the odd flat-pack mission, the Skoda makes loading and living around a car easier, with tidy solutions and everyday sensibility. The CUPRA keeps practicality in the brief but doesn’t hide the fact that it prioritises driver dynamics and style over sheer cargo-mindedness. Families and weekend warriors will find both usable, though their needs will nudge them toward different choices.
The Terramar trades a touch of suppleness for sharper turn-in and a more enthusiastic demeanor through corners, rewarding those who enjoy a lively commute or canyon road. The Kodiaq prefers composure and confidence, smoothing out the imperfections and offering a steadier, reassuring ride for longer journeys. Neither feels out of place on asphalt, but their road manners tell you what they were built to do.
Both cars bring modern tech that feels contemporary rather than experimental, but their approaches differ: one opts for a sportier, driver-focused interface while the other favours clear, no-nonsense ergonomics that anyone can master quickly. Touchscreens and menus are well thought out in daily life, yet the way each integrates features mirrors its overall personality. Expect to interact often, but without frustration.
If you’re after emotional flair, a sharper drive and a car that announces itself, the CUPRA will tick those boxes with confidence; if you prize practicality, interior space and a low-fuss companion for family duties, the Skoda is the sensible friend who won’t let you down. Commuters, style-conscious drivers, families and long-distance users will each find a clear case to make depending on which qualities matter most. It ultimately comes down to whether you want to be stirred or reassured every time you climb in.
Both cars bring strong arguments to the table, and the best choice depends on what you value on a daily basis — excitement or deliberation, sportiness or space. Keep reading to see how these impressions translate into our final DriveDuel assessment and discover which model earns the title in the full comparison.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,105 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the CUPRA Terramar with 1.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers barely more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 4 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar offers barely more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 400 Nm.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Terramar is very slightly lighter – 1,638 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 46 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more boot space – 910 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 370 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries barely more – 563 kg compared to 542 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.
details
The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,000 - 51,100 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,869 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España