Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Skoda Kodiaq or VW Touran fits your lifestyle better.
When comparing the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, buyers are presented with two distinctive vehicles tailored to different needs and lifestyle choices. While both vehicles come from esteemed automotive brands, their designs and functionalities position them uniquely in the market. This article aims to delve into the technical specifications and innovations that set these models apart.
The Skoda Kodiaq is a spacious mid-size SUV, presenting a robust and commanding presence on the road. With an elongated length of 4758 mm and a width of 1864 mm, its exterior dimensions translate into an ample cabin space, perfect for families and adventures.
On the other hand, the VW Touran is classified as a multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) that prioritizes versatility and comfort. With a compact length of 4527 mm and a width of 1829 mm, it is more manageable in urban environments while still providing ample space for passengers and cargo.
The Kodiaq offers a variety of engine types, including a plug-in hybrid, petrol MHEV, diesel, and traditional petrol options. It provides impressive power ranging from 150 HP up to 265 HP. This SUV boasts an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 6.3 seconds with its highest-performing variants, underscoring a sportier edge for an SUV.
Conversely, the VW Touran keeps its lineup focused on petrol and diesel engines, reaching a maximum output of 150 HP. The performance varies, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h taking around 9.3 seconds for the more powerful versions. While it may not match the Kodiaq’s performance figures, it is designed for efficiency and practicality.
In terms of consumption, the Kodiaq’s diverse engine lineup means various fuel economy figures that range from a mere 0.4 L/100km for the plug-in hybrid to about 8.2 L/100km for the more performance-oriented models. The range for electric driving hits up to 123 km, appealing to eco-conscious buyers.
In comparison, the Touran exhibits fuel efficiency figures ranging from 5.1 to 6.4 L/100km, making it a practical choice for daily commuting. This MPV emphasizes a balanced approach to consumption, catering to family needs without excessive fuel expenditures.
One of the primary considerations for family vehicles is cargo space. The Kodiaq excels with trunk capacities ranging from 745 to 910 liters, depending on configuration. Its tall design not only optimizes passenger space but also accommodates larger items, making it convenient for outdoor trips.
The Touran, while slightly smaller, offers a respectable trunk capacity of 834 liters, ensuring ample room for groceries or luggage. Its intelligent design allows for various seating configurations, further enhancing flexibility.
Both vehicles integrate advanced technologies and driver assistance features aimed at enhancing safety and convenience. The Kodiaq, in particular, offers a dual-clutch automatic transmission, which grants smooth gear transitions, contributing to a dynamic driving experience. Additionally, its SUVs often include advanced infotainment and connectivity options, arming the user with the latest tech tools on the road.
The Touran has not been left behind in the innovation race—equipped with VW’s signature infotainment systems and numerous safety technologies, it stands out with features like adaptive cruise control and various driver aids that provide peace of mind for family trips.
Choosing between the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran ultimately depends on your priorities. The Kodiaq is ideal for those seeking a powerful SUV that can handle both city and off-road adventures, coupled with innovative technology and spaciousness. The Touran, however, caters to families looking for comfort, practicality, and efficiency on a day-to-day basis.
Both vehicles represent the best of their respective classes, promising reliability and solid performance. It is this blend of features and functionalities that makes either choice compelling, leaving buyers with a satisfying problem to solve upon their decision-making journey.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Touran has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35400 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1453 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the VW Touran with 5.20 L. The difference is about 4.80 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a significantly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the VW Touran takes 8.90 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 231 km/h, while the VW Touran tops out at 209 km/h. The difference is around 22 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls barely noticeable stronger with 400 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Touran is to a small extent lighter – 1520 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 164 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers barely noticeable more room – 910 L compared to 834 L. That’s a difference of about 76 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – up to 2105 L, which is about 125 L more than the VW Touran.
When it comes to payload, VW Touran slight takes the win – 601 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The VW Touran stands out as a versatile and reliable choice for family transportation. Its spacious interior and cleverly designed seating arrangements offer exceptional comfort and practicality for both short trips and long journeys. With a focus on safety and an array of advanced features, the Touran delivers a driving experience that combines convenience with peace of mind.
details
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
35400 - 43900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
co2
136 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
MPV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1520 - 1631 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
834 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4527 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1668 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1980 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 545 kg
|
Payload
590 - 601 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 209 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España