Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Dacia Bigster - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 155 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 20600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Dacia Bigster?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Dacia Bigster has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Dacia Bigster with 4.70 L. The difference is about 3.20 L per 100 km.
Bigster
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 110 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Dacia Bigster takes 9.70 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Dacia Bigster tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls clearly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Dacia Bigster is a bit lighter – 1425 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 259 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 667 L. That’s a difference of about 243 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs hardly perceptible better – up to 2105 L, which is about 168 L more than the Dacia Bigster.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq somewhat takes the win – 563 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 98 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Dacia Bigster
4.7 (3 Reviews)
The Bigster is poised to redefine the SUV segment with its bold design and spacious interior, catering to the needs of both families and adventure seekers alike. Emphasizing sustainability and practicality, this model reflects a modern approach to automotive engineering, making it a compelling choice for environmentally conscious drivers. With its striking presence on the road, the Bigster not only captures attention but also embodies a new era of versatile mobility.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
20600 - 28100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 7.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
106 - 134 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1425 - 1611 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
546 - 667 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4570 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1813 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1705 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1851 - 1937 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
434 - 465 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, LPG
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 155 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 - 10.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
230 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1799 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Dacia
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.