VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Skoda Kodiaq?

Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Kodiaq — quick take for buyers

Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq arrive from the same stable but with very different priorities: the Enyaq is an all‑electric, serene long‑distance cruiser, while the Kodiaq is a traditional, hugely practical family SUV available with combustion or plug‑hybrid power. The Enyaq sells calm, low noise and modern EV convenience; the Kodiaq sells seats, space and sheer load‑carrying ability. Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq is a trade‑off between silent, refined travel and maximum everyday utility. Below we break down how those trade‑offs play out in character, comfort, practicality, city use and who each car actually fits best.

Kodiaq

Character and driving feel

The Skoda Enyaq feels engineered to soothe: electric torque and excellent insulation deliver a relaxed, effortless pace that rarely demands attention. The Skoda Kodiaq steers the opposite course in temperament by being deliberately solid and unflappable, with a driving manners tuned for stability rather than sparkle. If you want point‑and‑go calm and predictability on motorways the Enyaq’s quiet linearity is more satisfying; if you need a heavy‑duty, planted companion for towing or loaded family runs the Kodiaq’s composed, no‑nonsense behavior wins. Neither is a driver's sports car—Enyaq sacrifices engagement for serenity, Kodiaq trades feel for reassurance and cargo competence.

Enyaq

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

On long journeys the Skoda Enyaq impresses by making miles melt away: low cabin noise and cushioned seats create a restful environment for passengers and drivers alike. The Skoda Kodiaq also cruises quietly and feels very stable, but its advantage is that it carries more passengers and luggage without feeling overwhelmed. Enyaq’s suspension and acoustic tuning give a smoother perceived ride at steady speeds, whereas Kodiaq’s comfort depends more on wheel and suspension choices—bigger wheels can make it feel firmer over short sharp bumps. In short, Enyaq is the better silent cruiser; Kodiaq is the better heavy‑load long‑distance companion when space or towing matters.

Kodiaq

Practicality, cabin usability and family friendliness

This is where the Skoda Kodiaq makes a clear claim: flexible seating, a vast boot and an optional third row turn it into a true family workhorse for people who routinely move cargo or extra passengers. The Skoda Enyaq still offers a very practical cabin with clever storage and a large, usable boot for an EV, but it doesn’t match the Kodiaq’s sheer volume or the ability to add two extra seats when needed. Enyaq’s cabin feels modern and tidy, while Kodiaq leans into robustness and versatility with more physical controls and well‑thought‑out clever touches for everyday tasks. If your week includes sport kit, child seats and holiday luggage, Kodiaq’s packaging is more forgiving; if you value tidy EV packaging and a roomy rear for five, Enyaq will satisfy without the extra bulk.

Enyaq

City friendliness and day‑to‑day usability

In urban use the Skoda Enyaq punches above its size: electric drive, good visibility and a tight turning circle on rear‑drive versions make it easier to park and move in tight streets than its exterior suggests. The Skoda Kodiaq is broader and longer, so parking and narrow lanes feel more involved, but light steering and good driver aids keep it manageable for daily errands. Enyaq’s touchscreen‑centric controls feel contemporary but can be fussy; Kodiaq’s tactile dials and simpler layout make routine adjustments quicker and less distracting. For city dwellers with charging access the Enyaq is the more natural fit; for families who need to transport bulkier loads around town, the Kodiaq remains the pragmatic choice.

Kodiaq

Buyer fit: who should pick which car before the specs section

If your priority is calm cabin ambience, all‑electric running and a refined motorway experience, the Skoda Enyaq is the natural pick — especially for commuters and frequent motorway drivers with access to charging. If your daily reality is moving people, bikes and suitcases, needing occasional seven‑seat flexibility or wanting a diesel/PHEV option for long hauls, the Skoda Kodiaq is the more practical companion. The decision comes down to lifestyle trade‑offs: choose Enyaq for quiet, modern EV life and lower running fuss; choose Kodiaq for maximum space, towing and family versatility. The technical comparison that follows will make those practical differences measurable, but the emotional and everyday contrasts above are what usually decide the purchase.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is barely cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,029 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 467 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is visibly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 390 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more boot space – 910 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 325 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries marginally more – 563 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.