VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 54000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo EX60?

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • evident cheaper
  • slight lighter
  • slightly more trunk space

Volvo EX60

  • convincingly more power
  • hardly perceptible more efficient
  • noticeable more electric range
  • clearly perceptible quicker from 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12077 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Volvo EX60: with 14.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Skoda Enyaq with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 810 km, about 223 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 has a convincingly edge – offering 680 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 340 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX60 pulls slightly stronger with 790 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 111 Nm difference.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is slight lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2190 kg. The difference is around 11 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more room – 585 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq barely noticeable takes the win – 489 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 620 - 810 km

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 arrives as a sleek, family-friendly electric SUV that blends Scandinavian restraint with a surprising dash of personality, wrapping a calm, premium cabin around practical everyday usability. It’s aimed at buyers who prize safety and comfort but still want a car that rewards an enthusiastic drive, proving that sensible can be quietly fun.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

Price
41900 - 52200 £
Price
54000 - 70100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.2 kWh
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
620 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
2190 - 2425 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
4658 mm
Length
-
Width
1879 mm
Width
1899 mm
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
435 - 460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026 - 2027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.