@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Ford Explorer EV vs Skoda Enyaq – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Explorer EV or Skoda Enyaq fits your lifestyle better.

Explorer EV @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The electric vehicle market is rapidly evolving, and two formidable contenders in the SUV segment are the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq. Both vehicles offer cutting-edge technology, impressive performance, and eco-friendly features that make them attractive options for prospective electric SUV buyers. In this article, we'll dive into a comparison of these two titans across various key metrics.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Performance and Powertrain

When it comes to performance, the Ford Explorer EV gives buyers a choice of power configurations, with horsepower ranging from 170 HP to a robust 340 HP. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in a swift 5.3 seconds for the higher model. Its electric range is impressive as well, providing a maximum distance of 602 km on a single charge.

On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq holds its ground with a similarly broad range of power options, up to 340 HP, and an acceleration capability of 5.5 seconds for the fastest variant. However, its maximum electric range slightly trails the Explorer, peaking at 587 km. Both vehicles utilize rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options, giving buyers the flexibility to choose according to their driving style or needs.

Explorer EV @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Battery and Efficiency

The Ford Explorer EV is equipped with a battery capacity of 77 kWh, with consumption figures ranging from 13.9 to 16.6 kWh per 100 km depending on the model. This efficient performance contributes to an impressive range and offers an aspect of dependability for long road trips.

In comparison, the Skoda Enyaq offers options of both 77 kWh and a smaller 59 kWh battery. Its consumption ranges from 14.6 to 16.1 kWh per 100 km, making it slightly less efficient than the Explorer but still competitive within the electric SUV category. Both vehicles achieve a CO2 efficiency class of A, reinforcing their eco-friendly designs.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Design and Interior Space

Design-wise, the Ford Explorer EV presents a modern and robust SUV appearance with dimensions of 4468 mm in length, 1871 mm in width, and a height of up to 1639 mm. The trunk capacity stands at 450 liters, providing ample space for luggage and other belongings.

Conversely, the Skoda Enyaq showcases a longer frame at 4649 mm to 4658 mm while maintaining a width of 1879 mm and height variations from 1621 mm to 1623 mm. Its trunk capacity exceeds that of the Explorer with figures reaching 585 liters, making it a more practical option for families or long-distance travelers.

Explorer EV @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Technological Innovations

In terms of technology, the Ford Explorer EV is packed with features, including advanced safety systems, cutting-edge infotainment technologies, and smart charging capabilities. Innovations such as over-the-air updates ensure that the vehicle stays current with the latest software releases and improvements.

Skoda, meanwhile, has also focused on elevating the driving experience through its digital cockpit and connectivity features. The Enyaq comes with an intuitive infotainment system, virtual cockpit displays, and robust driver-assistance systems, creating a captivating and safe driving environment.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Conclusion

Both the Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq represent significant steps forward in the electric SUV space, each offering unique benefits. The Explorer leads in sheer power and range, while the Enyaq shines with practicality and interior space. Ultimately, the choice between the two will hinge on individual preferences, driving needs, and priorities in performance and space. Regardless of the decision, buyers can feel confident knowing they are choosing among the best in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Explorer EV has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 3857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Explorer EV: with 14.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Skoda Enyaq with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.

As for range, the Ford Explorer EV performs minimal better – achieving up to 602 km, about 15 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is minimal lighter – 1908 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 94 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeable more room – 585 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 135 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs somewhat better – up to 1710 L, which is about 288 L more than the Ford Explorer EV.

When it comes to payload, Ford Explorer EV slightly takes the win – 585 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Enyaq proves to be only a minor advantage and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Enyaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £38,100
Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 428 - 587 km
details

Ford Explorer EV

5 (2)
rate

The Ford Explorer EV marks a significant step forward in the brand's journey towards electrification, offering an impressive blend of performance and sustainability. This modern SUV features a sleek design complemented by advanced technology that enhances the driving experience. With a focus on comfort and innovation, the Explorer EV aims to redefine family travel for the electric age.

details
339B09E4-87F0-4F47-8A68-7DA1B14BD783 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
46E73473-7BD4-4D0A-B7B7-433A0148B614 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
09A01900-4D34-480B-A9A5-1A89755E12FF @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Skoda Enyaq

5 (3)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Reviews Ford Explorer EV

D.W. 29 Oct 2025, 18:09:06

I have owned and worked on Ford products for years and I am now driving an 07 Explorer 4.0 liter. 1 transmission and multiple soft parts and switches >300.000.
Klm. and still looks and runs great.
I am a Ford fan and will continue to be one, however the Rxplorer is looking dated. Come on you guys time for a Ford Home run. How about a totally resigned Ford Explorer. Hey how bout a diesel or a hybrid

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
Explorer EV @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price
34200 - 48800 £
Price
38100 - 52200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 17.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Electric Range
360 - 602 km
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1908 - 2179 kg
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
Trunk capacity
445 - 450 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4468 mm
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
Width
1871 mm
Width
1879 mm
Height
1630 - 1639 mm
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
Max trunk capacity
1417 - 1422 L
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Payload
561 - 585 kg
Payload
457 - 509 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Kia Corporation
Kia EV3
VS
Think of the Ford Explorer EV as the big, brash American SUV that brings proper space, towing potential and long-distance confidence, while the Kia EV3 is the clever, compact EV that packs smart tech, efficiency and value into a far more city-friendly package. Choose the Explorer if you need …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Capri
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Ford Capri is a cheeky, analogue icon that rewards you with pure-driver thrills, whereas the Ford Explorer EV is a spacious, gadget-rich electric SUV built for practicality and long-distance calm. Choose the Capri if you crave character and a cornering grin; choose the Explorer EV if you need …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The upcoming battle between the Ford Explorer EV and the BYD Sealion 7 in the electric SUV market promises an exciting showdown. The Ford Explorer EV touts a classic design paired with Ford’s reliability, making it an appealing choice for traditional enthusiasts eyeing modern technology, while the …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the roomy, no-nonsense EV SUV that puts practicality and bang‑for‑buck front and centre, while the VW ID.7 Touring is a sleek, aerodynamic estate that prioritises range and motorway comfort — sensible family hauler versus long‑distance specialist. Buy the Enyaq for space, …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Tavascan
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai IONIQ 5
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives as a hulking, family‑ready electric SUV — roomy, rugged and built for hauling people, bikes and weekend gear with that familiar American gusto. The Hyundai IONIQ 5, by contrast, is a slick, techy performer: sharper to drive, quicker to charge and far more efficient, …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
VS
The Skoda Enyaq bundles generous space, sensible packaging and impressive range into a down‑to‑earth package that undercuts rivals on price and practicality. The Volvo EX40, by contrast, offers sharper styling, a posher interior and tauter handling — Scandi calm and high‑tech polish for buyers who …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.7
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the pragmatic, spacious crossover that prioritises family-friendly practicality and sensible value—think a huge boot, simple controls and a comfy ride that happily survives school runs and weekend getaways. The VW ID.7 is a sleeker, more aerodynamic tourer with better …
What drive types are available for the Ford Explorer EV?

The Ford Explorer EV is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.