Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Skoda Enyaq?
The electric vehicle market is rapidly evolving, and two formidable contenders in the SUV segment are the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq. Both vehicles offer cutting-edge technology, impressive performance, and eco-friendly features that make them attractive options for prospective electric SUV buyers. In this article, we'll dive into a comparison of these two titans across various key metrics.
When it comes to performance, the Ford Explorer EV gives buyers a choice of power configurations, with horsepower ranging from 170 HP to a robust 340 HP. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in a swift 5.3 seconds for the higher model. Its electric range is impressive as well, providing a maximum distance of 602 km on a single charge.
On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq holds its ground with a similarly broad range of power options, up to 340 HP, and an acceleration capability of 5.5 seconds for the fastest variant. However, its maximum electric range slightly trails the Explorer, peaking at 587 km. Both vehicles utilize rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options, giving buyers the flexibility to choose according to their driving style or needs.
The Ford Explorer EV is equipped with a battery capacity of 77 kWh, with consumption figures ranging from 13.9 to 16.6 kWh per 100 km depending on the model. This efficient performance contributes to an impressive range and offers an aspect of dependability for long road trips.
In comparison, the Skoda Enyaq offers options of both 77 kWh and a smaller 59 kWh battery. Its consumption ranges from 14.6 to 16.1 kWh per 100 km, making it slightly less efficient than the Explorer but still competitive within the electric SUV category. Both vehicles achieve a CO2 efficiency class of A, reinforcing their eco-friendly designs.
Design-wise, the Ford Explorer EV presents a modern and robust SUV appearance with dimensions of 4468 mm in length, 1871 mm in width, and a height of up to 1639 mm. The trunk capacity stands at 450 liters, providing ample space for luggage and other belongings.
Conversely, the Skoda Enyaq showcases a longer frame at 4649 mm to 4658 mm while maintaining a width of 1879 mm and height variations from 1621 mm to 1623 mm. Its trunk capacity exceeds that of the Explorer with figures reaching 585 liters, making it a more practical option for families or long-distance travelers.
In terms of technology, the Ford Explorer EV is packed with features, including advanced safety systems, cutting-edge infotainment technologies, and smart charging capabilities. Innovations such as over-the-air updates ensure that the vehicle stays current with the latest software releases and improvements.
Skoda, meanwhile, has also focused on elevating the driving experience through its digital cockpit and connectivity features. The Enyaq comes with an intuitive infotainment system, virtual cockpit displays, and robust driver-assistance systems, creating a captivating and safe driving environment.
Both the Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq represent significant steps forward in the electric SUV space, each offering unique benefits. The Explorer leads in sheer power and range, while the Enyaq shines with practicality and interior space. Ultimately, the choice between the two will hinge on individual preferences, driving needs, and priorities in performance and space. Regardless of the decision, buyers can feel confident knowing they are choosing among the best in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Explorer EV is noticeably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,714 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 15 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is very slightly lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 183 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more boot space – 585 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 113 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries a bit more – 585 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.
The Ford Explorer EV comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 48,800 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España