Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Explorer EV vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Skoda Enyaq?
Explorer EV
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Explorer EV has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Explorer EV: with 14.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Skoda Enyaq with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV performs minimal better – achieving up to 602 km, about 15 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Explorer EV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is minimal lighter – 1908 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 94 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeable more room – 585 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 135 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs somewhat better – up to 1710 L, which is about 288 L more than the Ford Explorer EV.
When it comes to payload, Ford Explorer EV slightly takes the win – 585 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Enyaq proves to be only a minor advantage and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Enyaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Explorer EV
5 (2 Reviews)
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 48800 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 17.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
360 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1908 - 2179 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
445 - 450 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4468 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1871 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1630 - 1639 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1417 - 1422 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
561 - 585 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Explorer EV?
The Ford Explorer EV is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.