VS

Mercedes GLC vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (472 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (50,300 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLC or Volvo EX60?

Mercedes GLC vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Mercedes GLC

4.4 (13 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • a bit lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Volvo EX60

  • noticeably more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

GLC

Mercedes GLC VS Volvo EX60 — an executive summary

Mercedes GLC VS Volvo EX60 pits a familiar premium SUV against a modern electric contender, so the decision is less about raw specs and more about how each car fits your routine. The Mercedes GLC emphasizes traditional refinement: hushed cabin, supportive seats and conventional luggage packaging unless you choose a plug‑in model. The Volvo EX60 answers with EV packaging that frees up rear space, fast charging that shortens stops and deep Google integration for everyday convenience. This page focuses on the practical trade‑offs—comfort style, cabin usability and luggage logic—so you can see which approach matches your daily life before diving into numbers.

EX60

Driving character and motorway behavior

On the move the Mercedes GLC reads as a composed highway cruiser that soaks up distance with minimal fuss, whereas the Volvo EX60 projects an electric calm that feels both silent and responsive. Mercedes rewards steady, assured progress and can be softened or made more manoeuvrable with options like air suspension and rear‑axle steering. Volvo’s chassis tuning prioritises serenity over razor‑sharp feedback, so cornering is comfortable but less engaging for an enthusiastic driver. If you want steering clarity and a traditional luxe driving feel the GLC tends to suit better; if you prefer a tranquil, low‑effort ride with instant electric torque and fewer long charging stops, the EX60 is the more modern choice.

GLC

Comfort, seats and long trips

Both the Mercedes GLC and Volvo EX60 aim at long‑distance comfort but deliver it differently: the GLC through seat ergonomics and an insulated, quiet cabin, the EX60 through adaptive damping and an electric smoothness that reduces fatigue. Mercedes is strongest for drivers who spend many hours behind the wheel and want a plush ambience, though its ride can stiffen on larger wheels if you skip the air option. Volvo stands out for rear‑seat space and a flat floor that turns the back row into a genuinely comfortable place for adults on long journeys. For extended motorway miles the GLC feels reassuringly familiar, while the EX60 changes the trip rhythm with rapid charging and a quieter, more modern feel.

EX60

City use, parking and day‑to‑day practicality

In town the trade‑offs are tangible: the Mercedes GLC can be made surprisingly nimble with rear‑axle steering, yet its broad silhouette and touch‑first control layout make tight chores feel a bit fiddly. The Volvo EX60 masks its size with comprehensive cameras and a standard 360° parking setup, but an upward window line means you’ll rely on those aids rather than pure sight. Usability differs in luggage logic — GLC ICE models give straightforward, deep boot space that families appreciate, while GLC plug‑in versions lose usable cargo and gain a higher load floor; the EX60’s EV packaging brings a flat load floor and frunk options that change how you pack. If frequent city manoeuvres and tech‑assistance are priorities the EX60 is friendlier; if predictable boot space and conventional cargo access matter more, the GLC stays competitive.

GLC

Interior, tech and perceived quality

Inside, the Mercedes GLC leans on material quality at key touchpoints and a more classic premium feel, but its heavy reliance on screens and sensitive steering touchpads can be irksome in everyday use. The Volvo EX60 presents a bright, uncluttered Scandinavian cabin with physical controls on the wheel and deep Google integration that will appeal to those who value connectivity and intuitive voice operation. Perceived quality is similar in different ways: Mercedes trades some interface convenience for tactile luxury, while Volvo’s minimalist design and roomy rear make the cabin feel more modern and airy. If you want traditional luxury finishes and a familiar interface the GLC will feel right; if seamless connectivity, clear controls and rear passenger comfort are your priorities, the EX60 feels more contemporary.

Buyer fit — who should pick which car?

Choose the Mercedes GLC if your life centres on long motorway miles, you value conventional boot space in non‑PHEV versions and you prefer a familiar premium experience with options to tune ride and handling. Go for the Volvo EX60 if you’re committed to all‑electric driving, need generous rear passenger room with a flat floor, and prioritise rapid charging and modern connectivity. Also consider risk tolerance and data needs: the GLC is a proven package with well‑known strengths and quirks, while the EX60 is a newer, tech‑heavy entrant whose long‑term software and consumption picture is still emerging. Read on to the technical comparison to see how these real‑world differences translate into range, charging speed and running costs for your specific use case.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GLC

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes GLC is barely cheaper – starting at 50,300 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,664 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 682 km more than the Mercedes GLC.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 472 HP. That’s roughly 208 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mercedes GLC takes 4.2 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers barely more torque with 790 Nm compared to 750 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

GLC

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes GLC is a bit lighter – 1,985 kg compared to 2,189 kg. The difference is around 204 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers a bit more boot space – 620 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLC carries somewhat more – 575 kg compared to 461 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 810 km
Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes GLC

The Mercedes GLC blends quiet refinement with premium materials to create a comfortable, modern cabin that feels more upscale than its size might suggest. It delivers composed handling and confident on-road manners while offering practical versatility and a strong suite of driver assistance and infotainment features.

details

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

details
Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption

Price
50,300 - 82,100 £
Price
54,000 - 67,500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
122 - 128 km
Electric Range
611 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 214 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,985 - 2,400 kg
Curb weight
2,189 - 2,405 kg
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 - 1,920 mm
Width
1,899 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 - 575 kg
Payload
455 - 461 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
186 - 472 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 750 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
137 - 347 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 - 2,999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.