Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Mitsubishi Outlander - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Mitsubishi Outlander?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kodiaq has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6000 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.50 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – achieving up to 122 km, about 37 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Outlander
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a a bit edge – offering 306 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.90 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 61 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly perceptible lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 386 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 495 L. That’s a difference of about 415 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – up to 2105 L, which is about 701 L more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander barely noticeable takes the win – 595 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mitsubishi Outlander is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £42,800
Mitsubishi Outlander
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Mitsubishi Outlander
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
42800 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
19 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
53 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
495 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4719 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1862 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
545 - 595 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.