Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Skoda Kodiaq or Mitsubishi Outlander?
The automotive market is always buzzing with new innovations and comparisons, and two popular SUVs that stand out in 2024 are the Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander. Both vehicles cater to families and adventure seekers alike, but they come with different attributes that may appeal to different drivers. Let’s dive into a detailed comparison of these two offerings.
The Skoda Kodiaq offers a varied selection of engine types, including Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, and Petrol. With power outputs ranging from 150 to 265 HP, the Kodiaq provides versatility and options for customers seeking different levels of performance. The 265 HP engine, in particular, delivers a powerful driving experience with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of just 6.3 seconds, making it an exhilarating choice for SUV enthusiasts.
On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Outlander showcases a robust Plugin Hybrid engine that produces 306 HP. This performance grants the Outlander a respectable acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 7.9 seconds. Although it reaches a lower top speed of 170 km/h, the Outlander makes up for it with its advanced hybrid technology and environmentally friendly credentials.
The Skoda Kodiaq is equipped with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. This adaptability allows drivers to choose the setup that best meets their driving needs, whether navigating urban environments or off-road excursions.
In contrast, the Outlander features an all-wheel drive system, which enhances its traction and stability, particularly in challenging road conditions. It emphasizes versatility, making it an excellent choice for those who live in regions with inclement weather.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial aspect for modern drivers, and here the Kodiaq shines with its impressive consumption figures. The petrol variants boast fuel consumption ratings as low as 5.3 L/100km, and even the plugin hybrids can achieve efficiency figures around 0.4 to 0.5 L/100km, making them an excellent choice for the environmentally conscious consumer.
The Outlander, however, focuses on hybrid efficiency, recording a consumption figure of 0.8 L/100km. While this is still great for a vehicle of its size and capability, it may not match the Kodiaq's versatile petrol options. Additionally, the Outlander produces 18 g/km of CO2, which places it in a competitive emissions bracket.
Both the Kodiaq and Outlander come with five seats, but the Kodiaq enhances family-friendly features with a trunk capacity of 745 liters, expandable to 910 liters with seats down. This makes it ideal for long road trips or family getaways where luggage space is paramount.
The Outlander, in comparison, offers a trunk capacity of 495 liters. While this is adequate for everyday use, it may fall short for those needing extensive cargo space. Moreover, with a curb weight of 2070 kg, the Outlander is heavier than the Kodiaq, which may affect its agility and fuel efficiency during operation.
Modern SUVs are equipped with a range of technological advancements, and both models do not disappoint. The Skoda Kodiaq integrates advanced driver-assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a user-friendly infotainment system that supports connectivity features.
The Mitsubishi Outlander does not lag in this area; it incorporates a suite of safety features and an intuitive touch-screen interface that provides access to navigation and smart device compatibility. Both vehicles cater to tech-savvy consumers, but the actual user experience may vary based on personal preference.
The choice between the Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander ultimately depends on individual needs. If space, fuel efficiency, and a variety of engine options matter more, the Kodiaq may be the superior choice. However, for those prioritizing hybrid technology and all-wheel-drive capability, the Outlander offers a compelling option.
As with any vehicle decision, potential buyers should test-drive both models to determine which SUV best fits their lifestyle and driving preferences. Either way, both the Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander stand out in the competitive SUV segment, showcasing innovation and practicality for the modern driver.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kodiaq has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 6000 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Outlander with 0.80 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – achieving up to 123 km, about 38 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a a bit edge – offering 306 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.90 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 61 km/h.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly perceptible lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 386 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 495 L. That’s a difference of about 415 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – up to 2105 L, which is about 701 L more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander barely noticeable takes the win – 595 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
42800 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
co2
19 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
53 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
495 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4719 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1862 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
545 - 595 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España