VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Mitsubishi Outlander?

Kodiaq

The automotive market is always buzzing with new innovations and comparisons, and two popular SUVs that stand out in 2024 are the Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander. Both vehicles cater to families and adventure seekers alike, but they come with different attributes that may appeal to different drivers. Let’s dive into a detailed comparison of these two offerings.

Outlander

Engine Options and Performance

The Skoda Kodiaq offers a varied selection of engine types, including Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, and Petrol. With power outputs ranging from 150 to 265 HP, the Kodiaq provides versatility and options for customers seeking different levels of performance. The 265 HP engine, in particular, delivers a powerful driving experience with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of just 6.3 seconds, making it an exhilarating choice for SUV enthusiasts.

On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Outlander showcases a robust Plugin Hybrid engine that produces 306 HP. This performance grants the Outlander a respectable acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 7.9 seconds. Although it reaches a lower top speed of 170 km/h, the Outlander makes up for it with its advanced hybrid technology and environmentally friendly credentials.

Kodiaq

Transmission and Drive Type

The Skoda Kodiaq is equipped with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. This adaptability allows drivers to choose the setup that best meets their driving needs, whether navigating urban environments or off-road excursions.

In contrast, the Outlander features an all-wheel drive system, which enhances its traction and stability, particularly in challenging road conditions. It emphasizes versatility, making it an excellent choice for those who live in regions with inclement weather.

Outlander

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a crucial aspect for modern drivers, and here the Kodiaq shines with its impressive consumption figures. The petrol variants boast fuel consumption ratings as low as 5.3 L/100km, and even the plugin hybrids can achieve efficiency figures around 0.4 to 0.5 L/100km, making them an excellent choice for the environmentally conscious consumer.

The Outlander, however, focuses on hybrid efficiency, recording a consumption figure of 0.8 L/100km. While this is still great for a vehicle of its size and capability, it may not match the Kodiaq's versatile petrol options. Additionally, the Outlander produces 18 g/km of CO2, which places it in a competitive emissions bracket.

Kodiaq

Interior Space and Comfort

Both the Kodiaq and Outlander come with five seats, but the Kodiaq enhances family-friendly features with a trunk capacity of 745 liters, expandable to 910 liters with seats down. This makes it ideal for long road trips or family getaways where luggage space is paramount.

The Outlander, in comparison, offers a trunk capacity of 495 liters. While this is adequate for everyday use, it may fall short for those needing extensive cargo space. Moreover, with a curb weight of 2070 kg, the Outlander is heavier than the Kodiaq, which may affect its agility and fuel efficiency during operation.

Outlander

Advanced Technology and Innovations

Modern SUVs are equipped with a range of technological advancements, and both models do not disappoint. The Skoda Kodiaq integrates advanced driver-assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a user-friendly infotainment system that supports connectivity features.

The Mitsubishi Outlander does not lag in this area; it incorporates a suite of safety features and an intuitive touch-screen interface that provides access to navigation and smart device compatibility. Both vehicles cater to tech-savvy consumers, but the actual user experience may vary based on personal preference.

Kodiaq

Conclusion: Which SUV to Choose?

The choice between the Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander ultimately depends on individual needs. If space, fuel efficiency, and a variety of engine options matter more, the Kodiaq may be the superior choice. However, for those prioritizing hybrid technology and all-wheel-drive capability, the Outlander offers a compelling option.

As with any vehicle decision, potential buyers should test-drive both models to determine which SUV best fits their lifestyle and driving preferences. Either way, both the Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander stand out in the competitive SUV segment, showcasing innovation and practicality for the modern driver.

Skoda Kodiaq vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • distinct more electric range
  • distinct quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • clearly perceptible lighter

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6000 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Outlander with 2.60 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – achieving up to 122 km, about 37 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a a bit edge – offering 306 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.90 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly perceptible lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 386 kg.

When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander barely noticeable takes the win – 595 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

Price
36800 - 50600 £
Price
42800 - 53000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
60 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4758 mm
Length
-
Width
1864 mm
Width
1862 mm
Height
1679 - 1683 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
545 - 595 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
205 - 226 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
2360 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.