Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Volvo XC90?
In the world of SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 have emerged as popular choices for those seeking space, performance, and modern technology. What are the merits of each? Let's dive deeper into how these two models compare across various dimensions, from technical specifications to innovative features.
The first impression of an SUV often comes from its size and design. The Skoda Kodiaq measures slightly shorter with a length of 4,758 mm, a width of 1,864 mm, and a height varying between 1,663 mm and 1,683 mm. In contrast, the Volvo XC90 presents a more imposing figure at 4,953 mm in length, 1,923 mm in width, and a height of 1,771 mm. While the Kodiaq has a more compact, versatile shape suitable for urban environments, the XC90’s grand stature exudes luxury. Inside, the Volvo offers seating for seven passengers compared to the Kodiaq's five, aiming at larger families or those requiring additional seating versatility.
When it comes to performance, both SUVs offer multiple engine configurations. The Skoda Kodiaq provides a range of engines including plugin hybrid, petrol mild hybrid, diesel, and pure petrol options. It delivers a power spectrum ranging from 150 HP to 265 HP, with a respectable acceleration time of 6.3 to 9.7 seconds for 0 to 100 km/h. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC90 focuses on plugin hybrid and petrol mild hybrid engines, offering a compelling 455 HP from its top-tier hybrid engine that achieves 0 to 100 km/h in a swift 5.4 seconds.
In terms of efficiency, the Skoda Kodiaq provides an electric range of up to 123 km with its plugin hybrid models consuming as low as 0.4 L/100 km. Its CO2 emissions range from a minimal 9 g/km to 186 g/km depending on the powertrain. On the other hand, the XC90’s hybrid option offers an electric range of 71 km and a consumption rate of 1.2 L/100 km, making it an excellent contender for eco-conscious drivers. The XC90’s CO2 emissions are similarly varied, from 30 g/km to 191 g/km.
Storage and cargo space are crucial for SUV buyers. The Kodiaq showcases a generous trunk capacity of 910 liters, far surpassing the XC90's 302 liters. Although the XC90 offers extensive passenger space with its seven-seat configuration, the Kodiaq appeals to those needing a bulky cargo hold, especially when not using the rear seats for passengers.
Both models are equipped with advanced technologies to enhance driving experience. The Kodiaq features Skoda's latest infotainment system with connectivity options and intelligent assistance systems. Meanwhile, the XC90 is packed with Volvo's Pilot Assist technology, a semi-autonomous drive feature that aids in steering, acceleration, and braking under certain conditions. Each SUV also offers adaptive safety features like collision avoidance and lane-keeping assistance.
Ultimately, choosing between the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC90 boils down to individual priorities. The Kodiaq impresses with its abundant cargo space and range of powertrain options, offering considerable flexibility. Conversely, the XC90 stands out with its robust power, luxury appeal, and advanced technological integrations, attracting those desiring premium comfort and performance. Both vehicles cater to distinct market segments while providing the modern SUV experience that continues to evolve with each passing year.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £. That’s a price difference of around 32914 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.50 L. The difference is about 3.10 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs significantly better – achieving up to 123 km, about 52 km more than the Volvo XC90.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls clearly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is distinct lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2080 kg. The difference is around 396 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 608 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – up to 2105 L, which is about 249 L more than the Volvo XC90.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 clearly perceptible takes the win – 710 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Volvo XC90 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design, seamlessly blending luxury with versatility. Inside, it offers a spacious and meticulously crafted interior, showcasing high-quality materials and advanced technology. The vehicle provides a comfortable and smooth driving experience, making it a popular choice for families and long journeys.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 545 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España