@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-60 meets Skoda Kodiaq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

A Clash of Giants: Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Kodiaq

The automotive market is brimming with choices, but few segments capture the imagination quite like the family SUV arena. Among the front-runners in this category, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out for their performance, technology, and overall value. This article dives deep into the technical aspects and innovations of these two impressive vehicles, helping you determine which might suit your needs better.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Powertrains and Performance

Starting with the Mazda CX-60, it offers a versatile lineup of engines, including a plugin hybrid and a diesel MHEV option. With power outputs ranging from 200 HP to an impressive 327 HP, drivers can choose a variant that best suits their driving style. The CX-60 also boasts an official acceleration time of just 5.8 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h for its most powerful version, emphasizing its sporty credentials.

In comparison, the Skoda Kodiaq features a more conventional lineup, including plugin hybrid, petrol MHEV, and diesel options. The Kodiaq's power outputs are generally lower, topping out at 204 HP, with acceleration figures peaking at 7.8 seconds. While the Kodiaq may not be as quick as the CX-60, it showcases a range of capable engines that fulfill the needs for both urban commuting and long-distance travel.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency and Sustainability

Fuel efficiency is crucial in today’s automotive landscape, and both vehicles offer impressive numbers. The CX-60 shines with a remarkable consumption figure of 1.4 L/100 km in its hybrid variant, making it a great choice for eco-conscious drivers. The electric range of up to 64 km provides ample support for short commutes without the need for the combustion engine.

The Skoda Kodiaq also takes a commendable approach to efficiency, particularly with its plugin hybrid variant featuring an electric range of 123 km. Their best-performing petrol engine achieves a fuel consumption as low as 5.3 L/100 km, showcasing Skoda's effort in balancing performance with environmental considerations.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Interior and Comfort

When it comes to interior space and comfort, the Skoda Kodiaq takes the lead with a maximum trunk capacity of 910 liters, significantly outstripping the CX-60’s 570 liters. This makes the Kodiaq an excellent choice for families requiring ample cargo space. Both SUVs feature five seats and provide a comfortable driving experience, with high-quality materials that contribute to a premium feel.

Additionally, the CX-60 excels in its driver-focused layout. With Mazda’s signature design philosophy, the interior feels modern and cohesive, sporting intuitive technology interfaces and ample features that enhance driver engagement. The attention to detail is notable, making every journey enjoyable.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Innovative Technology Features

Innovation is at the center of both models, albeit expressed differently. The CX-60 includes Mazda’s latest infotainment system, integrating seamless connectivity with over-the-air updates and smart device integration. Safety technologies are comprehensive, including adaptive cruise control and lane assist options enhancing overall driving confidence.

On the other hand, the Kodiaq embraces technology with a more practical approach. It features advanced driver assistance systems as standard, complementing its spacious design with convenience-focused technology. Skoda’s infotainment system is user-friendly, and its virtual cockpit enhances the overall driving experience.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Driving Dynamics and Comfort

Driving dynamics reveal distinct personalities for both SUVs. The Mazda CX-60 offers a rear-wheel-drive option that delivers sporting prowess, with outstanding handling characteristics. This makes it a joy to drive, even on winding roads. Also, the all-wheel-drive variants promise dynamic performance in various driving conditions.

The Kodiaq, while focused on comfort and stability, prioritizes a smooth ride over sporty handling. Its front-wheel-drive layout, combined with refined suspension, emphasizes passenger comfort, making it highly suitable for family trips and daily errands with an emphasis on comfort over raw performance.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq boils down to individual preferences and requirements. The CX-60’s sporty performance and cutting-edge technology cater to those seeking a dynamic driving experience. Conversely, the Kodiaq’s focus on spaciousness, practicality, and comfort make it ideal for families.

Whichever you choose, both models demonstrate exceptional engineering, embodying the best of what the modern SUV can offer. It’s a thrilling time to be in the market for an SUV, with options like the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq leading the charge.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 5057 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 1.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs significantly better – achieving up to 123 km, about 59 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a to a small extent edge – offering 327 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is slightly lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 206 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – up to 2105 L, which is about 379 L more than the Mazda CX-60.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 to a small extent takes the win – 612 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_45646 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLB
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the fiercely competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota RAV4 stand out for their impressive combination of space, comfort, and technology. While the Kodiaq boasts a more versatile interior with configurable seating options, the RAV4 offers a reputation for reliability and superior fuel …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.