VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (327 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (43700 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Skoda Kodiaq?

CX-60

Street swagger and first impressions

The Mazda CX-60 arrives like a tailored suit: elegant, purposeful and a little playful, while the Skoda Kodiaq strikes a more pragmatic, upright pose that says “family-first” without fuss. Mazda leans on sculpted surfaces and premium cues to suggest more grown-up refinement, whereas Skoda opts for a familiar, solid presence that most buyers will instantly trust. Both appeal differently to the eye — one to the style-conscious, the other to the no-nonsense crowd — and your taste will decide which front driveway looks better.

Kodiaq

How they feel on the road

Behind the wheel, the Mazda CX-60 feels more pointed and composed, rewarding drivers who enjoy a connected, slightly sporty manner; it’s the one you’d choose for a twisty commute. The Skoda Kodiaq delivers reassuring stability and a calmer demeanor, biased toward comfort and confidence rather than corner-carving thrills. Neither is unpleasant; one leans toward engagement, the other toward serenity, so the choice is really about what kind of daily drive you prefer.

CX-60

Daily comfort and cabin ambience

Inside, Mazda aims for near-luxury warmth with materials and layout that feel deliberate and cozy, wrapping occupants in a refined atmosphere that favours the front row. Skoda’s cabin is airy and straightforward, with a practical, family-friendly vibe that puts usability above theatrics and makes life with kids and cargo feel easy. Both cabins succeed, but they speak to different buyers: those who want a plush cocoon versus those who value space and simple logic.

Kodiaq

Practicality when life gets real

The Skoda Kodiaq clearly thinks in terms of weekend adventures and full seat rows, offering a mindset built around flexibility and luggage-hauling without drama. The Mazda CX-60 is still useful, but its emphasis on refinement means practicality plays second fiddle to comfort and style. If your life involves sports gear, family trips and frequent load-ins, the Kodiaq feels tailored to that rhythm; if you’re more about polished drives and occasional cargo, the Mazda will keep you satisfied.

CX-60

Technology and daily usability

Both models package modern conveniences, but the way they deliver them differs: Mazda prefers a cleaner, more premium interface that harmonises with its interior design, while Skoda focuses on intuitive layouts and features that put quick access and child-friendly ergonomics front and center. Controls, displays and storage are designed with different priorities, so the more tech-savvy or neat-freak buyer might prefer Mazda’s restraint, and the practical family buyer will appreciate Skoda’s straightforward approach. Either way, neither car fights you for everyday usability.

Kodiaq

Who should buy which?

If you’re a driver who values engagement, a premium feel and a car that feels a bit special every time you slide in, the Mazda CX-60 will likely tick your boxes; if your life needs space, adaptability and an easygoing hauler that puts function first, the Skoda Kodiaq is built with you in mind. Consider your daily routes, family demands and what makes you smile in the driveway — that’s the quickest way to decide which one suits your life. Keep reading to see which model emerges as the DriveDuel Champion — the reveal comes next.

Mazda CX-60

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6823 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs significantly better – achieving up to 122 km, about 59 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a to a small extent edge – offering 327 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is slightly lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 206 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 slight takes the win – 612 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Mazda CX-60

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Top Car Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
43700 - 57900 £
Price
36800 - 50600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4758 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
-
Height
1679 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
205 - 226 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.