VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mazda CX-80?

Mazda CX-60 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-60

Mazda CX-60 VS Mazda CX-80 — which Mazda fits your daily life?

Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 sit next to each other in the range but pursue different practical goals: the Mazda CX-60 is the compact, luggage-minded five-seater while the Mazda CX-80 stretches into true family territory with three rows. The CX-60 trades extra seats for a noticeably bigger, easier-to-use boot and a more driver-focused presence, whereas the CX-80 trades cargo volume for passenger flexibility and a roomier second row. Both cars wear Mazda’s high-quality materials and restrained design, yet they feel different to live with from day one. If you can summarise priorities in a sentence, it’s cargo-and-driving polish for the Mazda CX-60 versus passenger versatility for the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Character and on-road personality

Mazda CX-60 drives like a composed mid-size SUV with a calm, motorway-focused personality; Mazda CX-80 feels weightier and more stately, tuned around carrying people rather than being sporty. The CX-60 gives a steadier, more planted impression at speed with a drivetrain that rewards long highway runs, while the CX-80 masks its mass with relaxed straight-line manners but reveals extra heft in direction changes. Both cars are not sold as sharp hot-hatches — the CX-60 nudges toward driver engagement more than the CX-80, which prioritises serenity for multiple occupants. The trade-off is simple: choose the Mazda CX-60 if you want a more compact, road-focused feel; choose the Mazda CX-80 if cabin calm and carrying capacity matter most.

CX-60

Comfort and long-distance usability

On long journeys both Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 impress with low noise levels and strong highway composure, but they arrive at that comfort through different compromises. The CX-60 tends to feel firmer over short, sharp bumps but settles into a hushed cruise, making it pleasant for solo or two-up touring; the CX-80 eases the experience for second-row passengers thanks to more space and softer sensations when cruising, even if town bumps can be more noticeable. In both cars the hybrid variants can introduce perceptible transitions in stop-and-go traffic, which slightly dents urban refinement. So for long motorway miles the Mazda CX-60 gives a taut, efficient experience, whereas the Mazda CX-80 gives a more accommodating cabin for passengers on extended trips.

CX-80

Practicality, space and everyday usability

The practical split is the clearest everyday differentiator between Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80: the CX-60 is the pragmatic 5-seater with a much larger and easier-to-load boot, while the CX-80 converts space into seating flexibility with an optional third row. Families who regularly need true seven-seat utility or who value a spacious second row will prefer the Mazda CX-80 despite its smaller loadspace with all seats raised and a higher loading sill. For weekend kit, dog carriers or towing duties the Mazda CX-60’s larger cargo area and simpler luggage access make life easier. In short, the Mazda CX-60 is better for luggage, gear and towing-focused users; the Mazda CX-80 is better for buyers prioritising passenger capacity and second-row comfort.

CX-60

Cabin feel, controls and perceived quality

Both Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 feel upmarket in materials and fit, but the cabin atmospheres diverge in how they present controls and technology. The CX-60 leans on a refined, minimalist cockpit that rewards tactile quality, whereas the CX-80 doubles down on practical hardware with numerous physical buttons and rotary controls that appeal to users who want things quick and obvious. Mazda’s non‑aggressive infotainment approach is shared between the two, so neither the CX-60 nor the CX-80 competes on flashy online services or the most modern voice assistants; both prefer safety and low distraction over touchscreen theatre. That means you get a premium surface feeling in both cars, with the CX-60 offering a slightly more driver‑centric layout and the CX-80 offering more tactile, passenger-friendly convenience.

CX-80

Buyer fit — who should pick which Mazda?

If your driving life is made of long distances, towing or carrying a lot of luggage, the Mazda CX-60 is the clearer match with its larger boot and motorway composure; if your life revolves around family shuttles, long second-row occupancy or occasional seven-seat needs, the Mazda CX-80 is the pragmatic choice. City dwellers who value easy manoeuvrability and a smaller footprint will likely prefer the Mazda CX-60, while buyers who accept a bigger car for the sake of space and on-board versatility will find the Mazda CX-80 more usable. Both models share Mazda’s strong interior quality and similar real-world compromises around ride firmness and PHEV transition behavior, so the decision rests on whether you prioritise cargo-and-driver focus (Mazda CX-60) or passenger-and-family flexibility (Mazda CX-80). Read on to see the technical comparison below for the measurable differences that underpin these everyday trade-offs.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 is a bit cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,657 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-60 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 63 km, about 3 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

Both models deliver identical power – 327 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 550 Nm.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is somewhat lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 241 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more boot space – 570 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 312 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries very slightly more – 650 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tiguan
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and VW Tiguan compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.