@ BMW Group Press
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-60 – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: BMW X3 meets Mazda CX-60.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3 @ BMW Group Press

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-60 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the BMW X3 costs 51300 £. That’s a price difference of around 9352 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the BMW X3 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.

As for range, the BMW X3 performs evident better – achieving up to 88 km, about 24 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 has a a bit edge – offering 398 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW X3 performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW X3 pulls slightly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

X3 @ BMW Group Press

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1890 kg compared to 1930 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 570 L of storage.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1726 L, which is about 26 L more than the BMW X3.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 barely noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £41,900
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

BMW X3

The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.

details
P90444059_highRes_bmw-x3-xdrive30d-11- @ BMW Group Press
P90424715_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv @ BMW Group Press
P90424688_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv @ BMW Group Press
P90424707_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv @ BMW Group Press
P90424709_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv @ BMW Group Press

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
X3 @ BMW Group Press
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
51300 - 72400 £
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
64 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
31 - 139 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 65 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1930 - 2140 kg
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4755 mm
Length
4745 mm
Width
1920 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1660 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Max trunk capacity
1600 - 1700 L
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Payload
570 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
215 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ BMW Group Press
BMW X3
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
When comparing the BMW X3 and the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, each SUV offers its own unique appeal to discerning drivers. The BMW X3 shines with its engaging handling and efficient powertrain, making it a joy for those who appreciate a spirited drive. Meanwhile, the Range Rover Velar stands out …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW 3 Series Touring
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X3
VS
In the battle between the BMW 3 Series Touring and the BMW X3, each vehicle offers a unique approach to practicality and performance. The 3 Series Touring impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, making it an enticing choice for driving enthusiasts who need additional cargo space. …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X3
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the BMW X3 stands out with its dynamic handling and luxurious interior, offering drivers a blend of performance and comfort. In contrast, the VW Tayron impresses with its practicality and spaciousness, making it an appealing choice for families seeking …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X3
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX3
VS
In the battle of luxury SUVs, the BMW X3 and its electric counterpart, the BMW iX3, showcase the brand's commitment to performance and innovation. While the X3 continues to impress with its powerful engine options and dynamic handling, the iX3 offers an eco-friendly driving experience without …
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BYD Seal U and Mazda CX-60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the BMW X3?

The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.