VS

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (398 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (51,700 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Mazda CX-60?

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

X3

Overview: BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 in one glance

The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 take very different approaches to the same mid‑size SUV brief: one leans into driver‑centric dynamics and long‑distance calm, the other into crafted materials and everyday usefulness. This comparison — BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-60 — is about trade‑offs: sharper handling and tech polish against roomy practicality and tactile quality. The X3 feels like a driver’s tool that happens to be family‑friendly, while the CX‑60 comes across as a solid, quietly refined companion for luggage‑and‑towing duties. Which suits you depends less on badge prestige and more on whether you prioritise steering feel and highway composure or interior luxury and cargo usability.

CX-60

Driving character and real‑world performance

The BMW X3 drives with a lighter, more precise steering and a sharper throttle response that rewards active drivers and makes motorway passing effortless. The Mazda CX‑60 answers with a calmer, more planted personality that favours smooth progress and steady towing over sportiness. In everyday use that means the X3 feels more lively and confidence‑inspiring in twisty roads, whereas the CX‑60 soaks up steady high‑speed miles with a composed gait but can feel heavier when you hustle it. If you want crispness and a touch of sport, lean toward the X3; if you prefer steady, effortless cruising and towing stability, the CX‑60 is the more natural fit.

X3

Comfort, refinement and long‑distance behavior

On long trips the BMW X3 impresses with low cabin noise and a settled ride that makes extended motorway stints less tiring, especially with adaptive dampers fitted. The Mazda CX‑60 is also quiet at speed and gives a more luxurious first impression, but its suspension tuning is generally firmer and transmits sharper hits over poor surfaces. Practical consequences are straightforward: the X3 will feel more relaxed on very long drives while the CX‑60 rewards you with premium comfort details and better day‑to‑day robustness for heavy loads. Owners who spend a lot of miles on fast roads will notice the X3’s composure; those carrying lots of kit or towing will value the CX‑60’s steady behavior despite a firmer ride in town.

CX-60

Cabin feel, controls and perceived quality

The Mazda CX‑60 clearly prioritises material quality and tactile detail — switchgear and trim feel closer to what buyers expect from a premium interior. The BMW X3, by contrast, aims for a modern interface with large displays but sacrifices some traditional haptic satisfaction, leaving a few areas feeling more utilitarian. That difference matters every day: the CX‑60’s surfaces and switches give a more reassuring, durable impression when you open doors and stow items, while the X3’s digital focus rewards those who prefer slick screens and advanced driver aids. If cabin warmth and perceived quality matter more than the latest graphical interface, the CX‑60 will please; if you want driver aids and a tech‑forward layout, the X3 pulls ahead.

X3

Usability, luggage and real‑world practicality

The Mazda CX‑60 wins on blunt, usable practicality: a low loading lip, easy‑to‑use boot space and generous towing capability make everyday loading and weekend trips simpler. The BMW X3 offers clever versatility with split folding rear seats and a tidy load floor, but in practice the higher sill and fiddly cover can make bulky items harder to manage. Families and active owners who regularly move bikes, crates or a caravan will find the CX‑60 more forgiving; buyers who prize modularity and thoughtful interior solutions will appreciate the X3’s layout despite the small nuisance points. Both carry five comfortably, but how you load them and what you tow is where the differences become tangible.

CX-60

Buyer fit — who should choose which car

Choose the BMW X3 if you value sharper steering, quieter high‑speed cruising and a tech ecosystem that supports long commuter miles and spirited driving. Opt for the Mazda CX‑60 if you want top‑notch materials, the most usable boot, stronger towing credentials and a fundamentally more traditional control layout. Urban buyers should note both are on the broad side: the X3’s wider stance and larger turning circle versus the CX‑60’s heavier low‑speed steering shape how each handles tight streets. Read on to the technical comparison to see how these real‑world differences map onto engines, ranges and load limits so you can match figures to the everyday experience you want.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-60 is slightly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,014 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X3 uses 2.8 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW X3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 88 km, about 25 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers slightly more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers somewhat more torque with 670 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,930 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 570 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries barely more – 612 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,700
X3

BMW X3

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 398 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 88 km
details
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW X3

The BMW X3 blends sporty handling with premium comfort, making it a strong choice for drivers who want an engaging everyday SUV. Its well-appointed interior and confident road manners give it broad appeal for families and commuters who value style and versatility.

details
P90444059_highRes_bmw-x3-xdrive30d-11-
P90424715_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424688_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424707_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424709_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv

Reviews BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW X3
VS
The BMW 3 Series Touring and the BMW X3 both bring BMW's driving focus to practical buyers — the 3 Series Touring is a sporty station wagon, while the X3 is a compact SUV with higher ride height and greater versatility. Which suits you depends on priorities: the Touring leans to sharper handling …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
BMW 5 Series Touring
BMW X3
VS
The BMW 5 Series Touring and the BMW X3 pit estate practicality against compact SUV versatility, giving buyers a clear choice between low-slung refinement and higher-riding utility. Choose the 5 Series Touring if you prioritise cargo space, on-road comfort and a more car-like driving feel; pick the …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tiguan
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and VW Tiguan compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BMW iX2
BMW X3
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW iX2 and BMW X3 offer distinct experiences for discerning drivers. The iX2, embracing the future with its all-electric powertrain, promises sustainability without sacrificing BMW's legendary performance and cutting-edge technology. Meanwhile, the BMW X3, with its …
BMW X2
BMW X3
VS
Choosing between the BMW X2 and BMW X3 comes down to priorities: the X2 is a sportier, city-friendly compact with coupe-like styling and sharper handling, while the X3 is a more conventional, family-oriented SUV that emphasizes space, comfort and versatility. If you want style and agility for daily …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
51,700 - 73,000 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
570 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda
Is the BMW X3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.