VS

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (398 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (51300 £ vs 43700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Mazda CX-60?

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • evident more efficient
  • evident more electric range
  • distinct quicker from 0–100 km/h

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • barely noticeable lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-60 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43700 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7586 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW X3 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the BMW X3 performs evident better – achieving up to 88 km, about 25 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 has a a bit edge – offering 398 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW X3 pulls slightly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1890 kg compared to 1930 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 570 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 barely noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £51,300
X3

BMW X3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 197 - 398 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.7 L
  • Electric Range : 88 km
details

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.

details
P90444059_highRes_bmw-x3-xdrive30d-11-
P90424715_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424688_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424707_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424709_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
51300 - 72400 £
Price
43700 - 57900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
60 - 65 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1930 - 2140 kg
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4755 mm
Length
-
Width
1920 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1660 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
570 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
215 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW X3
VS
In the battle between the BMW 3 Series Touring and the BMW X3, each vehicle offers a unique approach to practicality and performance. The 3 Series Touring impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, making it an enticing choice for driving enthusiasts who need additional cargo space. …
BMW X3
Volvo XC40
VS
In the fiercely competitive compact SUV market, the BMW X3 stands out with its sporty handling and luxurious interior, making it an appealing choice for driving enthusiasts. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 excels in safety features and boasts a minimalist Scandinavian design that emphasizes comfort and …
BMW X3
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the BMW X3 stands out with its dynamic handling and luxurious interior, offering drivers a blend of performance and comfort. In contrast, the VW Tayron impresses with its practicality and spaciousness, making it an appealing choice for families seeking …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-60
VS
When comparing the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-60, enthusiasts will find a compelling battle between sporty performance and refined practicality. The Terramar stands out with its aggressive design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who crave adrenaline on the road. In contrast, …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
BMW X3
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Unsure whether the BMW X3 or the Nissan X-Trail is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
What drive types are available for the BMW X3?

The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.