@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo XC90 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-80 meets Volvo XC90.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Introduction: A Clash of Titans in the SUV Market

In the competitive world of SUVs, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC90 stand out as two of the most intriguing options for 2024. Each vehicle brings its own strengths and innovations to the table, offering compelling features for families and adventure seekers alike. In this article, we’ll dive into a detailed comparison of these two models, focusing on technical specifications, performance, comfort, and safety innovations.

XC90 @ Volvo Cars

Technical Specifications: Power and Performance

The Mazda CX-80 impresses with a choice of a plug-in hybrid and a diesel MHEV engine. The hybrid variant delivers up to 327 HP with a robust torque of 500 Nm, all while achieving a commendable fuel consumption rate of just 1.6 L/100km. The diesel option provides a balanced 254 HP and a solid torque of 550 Nm, offering an efficient and powerful ride.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 excels in raw power, especially with its petrol MHEV engine capable of reaching 455 HP and a staggering torque of 709 Nm. This SUV also includes a plug-in hybrid variant generating 250 HP. Despite its higher engine capacity of 1969 cm3, the XC90’s fuel consumption is less efficient at 8.5 L/100km for the petrol variant but offers an impressive electric range of 71 km.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Acceleration and Top Speed: A Competitive Edge

When it comes to acceleration, the Mazda CX-80 takes the lead with the plug-in hybrid variant reaching 0-100 km/h in just 6.8 seconds. The diesel model follows closely at 8.4 seconds, both providing quick responsiveness and driving fun.

The XC90, while slightly lagging in acceleration with its fastest models clocking in at 5.4 and 7.7 seconds, makes up for this with a top speed reaching 180 km/h, compared to the CX-80's 195 km/h. Although Mazda’s model has the edge in speed, Volvo compensates with a more powerful performance profile.

XC90 @ Volvo Cars

Space and Comfort: Configurations for Families

Both the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC90 are designed with space and comfort in mind, seating up to seven passengers. The CX-80 boasts a maximum luggage capacity of 258 liters, which is decent for daily usability. However, the XC90 outshines in trunk capacity, offering up to 302 liters in its versatile interior.

Interior dimensions of these SUVs also play a vital role in passenger comfort. The CX-80 stretches slightly longer at 4995 mm, while the XC90’s length measures 4953 mm. Width-wise, the XC90 is marginally broader at 1923 mm compared to the CX-80's 1890 mm, potentially translating to a roomier cabin experience in the Volvo.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Safety Innovations: Leading the Way

In the realm of safety, both Mazda and Volvo have established reputations for passenger protection. The XC90 has long been known for its robust safety systems, boasting advanced driver-assistance technologies like automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assist, and a comprehensive airbag system. The latest XC90 incorporates Volvo's innovative Pilot Assist, which provides semi-autonomous driving capabilities, enhancing safety and comfort during long distances.

The CX-80 is also equipped with an array of safety features, including adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, and Mazda’s i-Activsense suite, which ensures high levels of vigilance on the road. However, it’s the Volvo’s commitment to safety that often gives it the edge in customer perception and independent safety ratings.

XC90 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion: Which SUV Comes Out on Top?

The Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC90 present themselves as formidable contenders in the SUV segment for 2024. The CX-80 stands out for its performance efficiency, faster acceleration, and sportier driving experience. Meanwhile, the XC90 impresses with its powerful engine options, higher trunk capacity, and luxurious safety features.

Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on individual priorities, whether one values performance and style over sheer power and advanced safety features. Regardless of choice, both vehicles serve as fantastic options for families seeking comfort, versatility, and cutting-edge innovation on the road.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £. That’s a price difference of around 21548 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.50 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Volvo XC90 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 71 km, about 10 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls distinct stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC90 is slight lighter – 2080 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 51 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC90 offers somewhat more room – 302 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs slight better – up to 1971 L, which is about 115 L more than the Volvo XC90.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 minimal takes the win – 710 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Volvo XC90

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC90 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design, seamlessly blending luxury with versatility. Inside, it offers a spacious and meticulously crafted interior, showcasing high-quality materials and advanced technology. The vehicle provides a comfortable and smooth driving experience, making it a popular choice for families and long journeys.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue @ Volvo Cars
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue @ Volvo Cars
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue @ Volvo Cars
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration @ Volvo Cars
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
XC90 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Price
69800 - 84600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
61 km
Electric Range
71 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
35 - 151 g/km
co2
79 - 191 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4953 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1923 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1771 mm
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
653 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the battle of the SUVs, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its reliability and practicality, making it a top choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC90 impresses with its luxurious interior and advanced safety features, catering to those who prioritize comfort and …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sorento
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Kia Sorento impresses with its value and spacious interior, making it a compelling choice for families seeking practicality without breaking the bank. Conversely, the Volvo XC90 stands out for its luxurious design and advanced safety features, appealing to those …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLC
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
The Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC90 both offer a blend of luxury, style, and performance, catering to discerning SUV enthusiasts. The GLC shines with its sporty design, cutting-edge technology, and the distinct elegance typical of Mercedes-Benz, while the XC90 impresses with its spacious interior, …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the battle of luxury SUVs, the Volvo XC90 and VW Touareg showcase distinct approaches to comfort and performance. The XC90 impresses with its Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. On the other hand, the Touareg offers a more rugged sophistication …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
Volvo XC90 and Land Rover Range Rover go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
BYD Seal U and Volvo XC90 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.