In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference in style versus functionality, as both models cater to the needs of modern families.
In the competitive world of SUVs, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC90 stand out as two of the most intriguing options for 2024. Each vehicle brings its own strengths and innovations to the table, offering compelling features for families and adventure seekers alike. In this article, we’ll dive into a detailed comparison of these two models, focusing on technical specifications, performance, comfort, and safety innovations.
The Mazda CX-80 impresses with a choice of a plug-in hybrid and a diesel MHEV engine. The hybrid variant delivers up to 327 HP with a robust torque of 500 Nm, all while achieving a commendable fuel consumption rate of just 1.6 L/100km. The diesel option provides a balanced 254 HP and a solid torque of 550 Nm, offering an efficient and powerful ride.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 excels in raw power, especially with its petrol MHEV engine capable of reaching 455 HP and a staggering torque of 709 Nm. This SUV also includes a plug-in hybrid variant generating 250 HP. Despite its higher engine capacity of 1969 cm3, the XC90’s fuel consumption is less efficient at 8.5 L/100km for the petrol variant but offers an impressive electric range of 71 km.
When it comes to acceleration, the Mazda CX-80 takes the lead with the plug-in hybrid variant reaching 0-100 km/h in just 6.8 seconds. The diesel model follows closely at 8.4 seconds, both providing quick responsiveness and driving fun.
The XC90, while slightly lagging in acceleration with its fastest models clocking in at 5.4 and 7.7 seconds, makes up for this with a top speed reaching 180 km/h, compared to the CX-80's 195 km/h. Although Mazda’s model has the edge in speed, Volvo compensates with a more powerful performance profile.
Both the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC90 are designed with space and comfort in mind, seating up to seven passengers. The CX-80 boasts a maximum luggage capacity of 258 liters, which is decent for daily usability. However, the XC90 outshines in trunk capacity, offering up to 302 liters in its versatile interior.
Interior dimensions of these SUVs also play a vital role in passenger comfort. The CX-80 stretches slightly longer at 4995 mm, while the XC90’s length measures 4953 mm. Width-wise, the XC90 is marginally broader at 1923 mm compared to the CX-80's 1890 mm, potentially translating to a roomier cabin experience in the Volvo.
In the realm of safety, both Mazda and Volvo have established reputations for passenger protection. The XC90 has long been known for its robust safety systems, boasting advanced driver-assistance technologies like automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assist, and a comprehensive airbag system. The latest XC90 incorporates Volvo's innovative Pilot Assist, which provides semi-autonomous driving capabilities, enhancing safety and comfort during long distances.
The CX-80 is also equipped with an array of safety features, including adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, and Mazda’s i-Activsense suite, which ensures high levels of vigilance on the road. However, it’s the Volvo’s commitment to safety that often gives it the edge in customer perception and independent safety ratings.
The Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC90 present themselves as formidable contenders in the SUV segment for 2024. The CX-80 stands out for its performance efficiency, faster acceleration, and sportier driving experience. Meanwhile, the XC90 impresses with its powerful engine options, higher trunk capacity, and luxurious safety features.
Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on individual priorities, whether one values performance and style over sheer power and advanced safety features. Regardless of choice, both vehicles serve as fantastic options for families seeking comfort, versatility, and cutting-edge innovation on the road.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 47400 - 59400
£
|
Price
about 68500 - 81300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
60
km
|
Electric Range
71
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7
kWh
|
co2
35 - 148
g/km
|
co2
30 - 191
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
7
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240
kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297
kg
|
Trunk capacity
258
L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302
L
|
Length
4995
mm
|
Length
4953
mm
|
Width
1890
mm
|
Width
1923
mm
|
Height
1714
mm
|
Height
1771
mm
|
Payload
649 - 650
kg
|
Payload
653 - 710
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
254 - 327
HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7
s
|
Max Speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
500 - 550
Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
187 - 241
kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335
kW
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.