VS

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Tayron comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 39,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or VW Tayron?

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Tayron: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • slightly more power

VW Tayron

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

CX-80

As the automotive market evolves, consumers often find themselves faced with the dilemma of choosing between two compelling models. In this comparison, we delve into the features, performance, and innovations of the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, two SUVs that aim to cater to modern drivers' needs while providing distinct advantages. Let's explore the details.

Tayron

Powertrain Performance

The Mazda CX-80 comes equipped with a range of powerful engine options, including a robust 327 HP plug-in hybrid and a respectable 254 HP diesel mild-hybrid. These engines are paired with an automatic gearbox and all-wheel drive, delivering commendable performance with an acceleration range of 6.8 to 8.4 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint. With a torque output that reaches up to 550 Nm, the CX-80 promises engaging driving dynamics.

In contrast, the VW Tayron offers a diverse engine lineup that features petrol mild-hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and diesel options. The Tayron's power output varies substantially, with a maximum of 272 HP available from its high-performance engine. The Tayron also boasts competitive acceleration times ranging from 7.3 to 9.4 seconds, depending on the engine variant selected. With torque figures reaching 400 Nm, the Tayron positions itself as a capable contender in performance.

CX-80

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for many buyers today. The Mazda CX-80 leads with impressive consumption figures of just 1.6 L/100 km for its plug-in hybrid variant, while the diesel option still achieves a respectable 5.7 L/100 km. CO2 emissions start at a low 35 g/km for the plug-in hybrid, making it an eco-friendly choice for consumers keen on reducing their carbon footprint.

On the other side, the VW Tayron demonstrates a varied performance in this aspect, with figures ranging between 0.4 L/100 km for the hybrid variant and 6.2 L/100 km for petrol engines. Its emissions vary as well, with some models emitting as low as 9 g/km, illustrating the efficiency potential of its electrified powertrains.

Tayron

Interior Space and Comfort

While the Mazda CX-80 accommodates up to seven passengers, the VW Tayron seats five, which may cater to different audience needs. The CX-80 features a trunk capacity of 258 liters, which may feel limiting compared to the Tayron’s ample luggage space of 705 to 885 liters, depending on the configuration. For families or those needing extra storage, the Tayron's versatile interior may offer a more practical solution.

CX-80

Dimensions and Design

In terms of dimensions, the Mazda CX-80 measures 4995 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1714 mm in height. This larger stature translates into a commanding road presence, which many drivers appreciate. The design quality reflects Mazda's commitment to a premium feel through thoughtful craftsmanship.

The VW Tayron is a more compact option at 4792 mm long, with a width of 1853 to 1866 mm and a height of 1666 to 1668 mm. While smaller, its elegant, dynamic design language captures the modern essence that VW is known for, making it visually appealing for urban drivers.

Tayron

Innovations and Technology

Both SUVs come packed with technological advancements that enhance driving experiences. The Mazda CX-80 features innovative safety systems and advanced infotainment capabilities, ensuring that passengers stay connected while on the road.

Meanwhile, the VW Tayron enhances driver assistance with a cutting-edge suite of tech features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a comprehensive digital cockpit, which allows drivers to customize their displays for a more personalized driving interface.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Mazda CX-80 and VW Tayron ultimately hinges on buyer preferences. The CX-80 shines with its spacious seven-seater layout, robust hybrid options, and eco-friendly attributes. In contrast, the Tayron captivates with a streamlined design, innovative features, and impressive cargo capacity. Both vehicles offer technological advancements and performance capabilities, but your choice will depend on specific needs and lifestyle. Each SUV represents a unique balance of performance and practicality, making them worthy contenders in a highly competitive segment.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW Tayron is visibly cheaper – starting at 39,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,716 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Tayron uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the VW Tayron offers considerably more range – reaching up to 123 km, about 63 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Tayron

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Tayron is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.1 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, VW Tayron is markedly lighter – 1,682 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 449 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Tayron offers considerably more boot space – 885 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 627 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries slightly more – 650 kg compared to 566 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Tayron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,600
Tayron

VW Tayron

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 116 - 123 km
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

VW Tayron

The VW Tayron is Volkswagen's roomy, no-nonsense SUV that pairs clean, familiar styling with a practical cabin built for families and everyday use. It rides comfortably, packs sensible tech and creature comforts, and feels like the sensible sweater of SUVs for buyers who prefer steady value over headline-grabbing drama.

details
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
39,600 - 56,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
116 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
33 - 192 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,682 - 1,948 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
Length
-
Length
4,792 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,853 - 1,866 mm
Height
-
Height
1,666 - 1,668 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,915 - 2,090 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
489 - 566 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
204 - 221 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.