In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. Ultimately, both vehicles deliver strong performance, making the choice lean heavily on personal style and desired driving experience.
As the automotive market evolves, consumers often find themselves faced with the dilemma of choosing between two compelling models. In this comparison, we delve into the features, performance, and innovations of the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, two SUVs that aim to cater to modern drivers' needs while providing distinct advantages. Let's explore the details.
The Mazda CX-80 comes equipped with a range of powerful engine options, including a robust 327 HP plug-in hybrid and a respectable 254 HP diesel mild-hybrid. These engines are paired with an automatic gearbox and all-wheel drive, delivering commendable performance with an acceleration range of 6.8 to 8.4 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint. With a torque output that reaches up to 550 Nm, the CX-80 promises engaging driving dynamics.
In contrast, the VW Tayron offers a diverse engine lineup that features petrol mild-hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and diesel options. The Tayron's power output varies substantially, with a maximum of 272 HP available from its high-performance engine. The Tayron also boasts competitive acceleration times ranging from 7.3 to 9.4 seconds, depending on the engine variant selected. With torque figures reaching 400 Nm, the Tayron positions itself as a capable contender in performance.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for many buyers today. The Mazda CX-80 leads with impressive consumption figures of just 1.6 L/100 km for its plug-in hybrid variant, while the diesel option still achieves a respectable 5.7 L/100 km. CO2 emissions start at a low 35 g/km for the plug-in hybrid, making it an eco-friendly choice for consumers keen on reducing their carbon footprint.
On the other side, the VW Tayron demonstrates a varied performance in this aspect, with figures ranging between 0.4 L/100 km for the hybrid variant and 6.2 L/100 km for petrol engines. Its emissions vary as well, with some models emitting as low as 9 g/km, illustrating the efficiency potential of its electrified powertrains.
While the Mazda CX-80 accommodates up to seven passengers, the VW Tayron seats five, which may cater to different audience needs. The CX-80 features a trunk capacity of 258 liters, which may feel limiting compared to the Tayron’s ample luggage space of 705 to 885 liters, depending on the configuration. For families or those needing extra storage, the Tayron's versatile interior may offer a more practical solution.
In terms of dimensions, the Mazda CX-80 measures 4995 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1714 mm in height. This larger stature translates into a commanding road presence, which many drivers appreciate. The design quality reflects Mazda's commitment to a premium feel through thoughtful craftsmanship.
The VW Tayron is a more compact option at 4792 mm long, with a width of 1853 to 1866 mm and a height of 1666 to 1668 mm. While smaller, its elegant, dynamic design language captures the modern essence that VW is known for, making it visually appealing for urban drivers.
Both SUVs come packed with technological advancements that enhance driving experiences. The Mazda CX-80 features innovative safety systems and advanced infotainment capabilities, ensuring that passengers stay connected while on the road.
Meanwhile, the VW Tayron enhances driver assistance with a cutting-edge suite of tech features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a comprehensive digital cockpit, which allows drivers to customize their displays for a more personalized driving interface.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-80 and VW Tayron ultimately hinges on buyer preferences. The CX-80 shines with its spacious seven-seater layout, robust hybrid options, and eco-friendly attributes. In contrast, the Tayron captivates with a streamlined design, innovative features, and impressive cargo capacity. Both vehicles offer technological advancements and performance capabilities, but your choice will depend on specific needs and lifestyle. Each SUV represents a unique balance of performance and practicality, making them worthy contenders in a highly competitive segment.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 47400 - 59400
£
|
Price
about 39000 - 52600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 7.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
60
km
|
Electric Range
117 - 126
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
co2
35 - 148
g/km
|
co2
9 - 177
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240
kg
|
Curb weight
1682 - 1948
kg
|
Trunk capacity
258
L
|
Trunk capacity
705 - 885
L
|
Length
4995
mm
|
Length
4792
mm
|
Width
1890
mm
|
Width
1853 - 1866
mm
|
Height
1714
mm
|
Height
1666 - 1668
mm
|
Payload
649 - 650
kg
|
Payload
489 - 566
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
254 - 327
HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Max Speed
204 - 240
km/h
|
Torque
500 - 550
Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
187 - 241
kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200
kW
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Top speed
204 - 240
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, F, G
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.