VS

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Tayron comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or VW Tayron?

Mazda CX-80 vs VW Tayron: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
details

VW Tayron

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-80

Overview: Mazda CX-80 VS VW Tayron in one look

Mazda CX-80 VS VW Tayron bring two different philosophies to the large family‑SUV table: the CX‑80 leans toward crafted materials, seven‑seat flexibility and towing strength, while the Tayron prioritises roomy five‑seat practicality, a very quiet motorway ride and a larger, more usable boot. The Mazda feels like a premium-minded, hands‑on tool with lots of physical controls and a strong second row; the VW feels like a placid, ergonomic family car that favours comfort and luggage space. Both cars are substantial, so neither is ideal for tight city parking, but the trade-offs you get in return are distinct. Below I’ll unpack how those differences play out in everyday life so you can judge which compromises you’d rather live with.

Tayron

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The Mazda CX-80 presents a deliberately premium cabin: tactile knobs, high‑grade materials and a clean, restrained design that reads more expensive than its badge. The VW Tayron counters with a more modern, gadget‑forward interior—clearer digital menus and practical controls—but some surfaces feel more corporate and less tactile than Mazda’s. In everyday use the CX‑80’s workmanship gives a sense of care and longevity, while the Tayron’s layout rewards quick access and configurability for multiple drivers. If you prize hand‑felt quality and a calm, analogue interface, the CX‑80 wins the mood battle; if you prefer a more systematic, driver‑assist friendly cockpit, the Tayron feels more grown‑up and functional.

CX-80

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

On long runs the VW Tayron is the more relaxing companion: excellent noise suppression and a comfort‑biased suspension make motorway miles glide by with minimal fatigue. The Mazda CX‑80 also cruises with poise and diesel refinement, but its suspension is firmer over short sharp bumps and 20‑inch wheels can transmit more harshness in town. The Tayron’s availability of adaptive damping and softer baseline setup helps it swallow undulations that the CX‑80 translates into a firmer, more controlled feel. If most of your miles are motorway and you value serenity, the Tayron is preferable; if you want a composed, weighty feel and stronger towing composure, the CX‑80 brings a steadier, muscular character.

Tayron

Practicality, seats and family usability

The Mazda CX‑80’s headline is versatility: generous second‑row space, optional captain chairs and a true seven‑seat layout that suits families who regularly need extra occupants or heavy towing capability. The VW Tayron excels as a five‑seat family hauler with a larger and lower‑loading boot that makes everyday shopping, strollers and suitcases far easier to manage. In practice that means the CX‑80 is the better choice when you need flexible seating or frequent trailer work, while the Tayron is superior if you rarely use the third row and want a more usable cargo area day‑to‑day. Both offer secure ISOFIX seating in the rear, but the third row in either is best treated as a kids‑only solution rather than a full‑time adult space.

CX-80

City friendliness, controls and infotainment

In town the Mazda CX‑80’s many physical buttons and rotary controller make quick adjustments simple and safe, yet the infotainment visuals and voice control feel dated compared with newer rivals. The VW Tayron’s system is more contemporary and organised, with straightforward menus and helpful presets, although touch sliders and some camera images remain fiddly in practice. Manoeuvring both large SUVs is similar work—visibility aids help—but the Mazda’s greater width and heft are more noticeable in tight parking; the Tayron steers lighter and feels easier to position. If you want intuitive, button‑first ergonomics that keep your eyes off the screen, the CX‑80 is preferable; if you value clearer digital layout and a lower boot lip for daily loading, the Tayron wins the city chores battle.

Tayron

Who each car actually fits — buyer trade‑offs before the specs

Choose the Mazda CX‑80 if your priority is a premium cabin feel, rear‑seat flexibility and a vehicle that can tow and carry a stretched family configuration with confidence; accept a firmer urban ride and tighter third‑row practicality as the price for that versatility. Opt for the VW Tayron if you want the most effortless everyday usability: a quieter long‑distance cruiser, a more accessible and capacious boot as a five‑seater, and modernised in‑car systems with stronger PHEV electric range and charging practicality. Both are large, capable SUVs, so the decision comes down to whether you need seven‑seat versatility and tactile quality (Mazda CX‑80) or the quieter, more cargo‑centric and comfort‑biased package (VW Tayron); the technical comparison that follows will make those functional trade‑offs clearer in measurable terms.

Frequently compared as well

VW Touareg
VW Tayron
VS
Comparing the VW Touareg and the VW Tayron is essentially choosing between a more premium, comfort- and capability-focused mid‑size SUV and a China‑market, value‑oriented alternative that emphasizes practicality and modern styling. If you prioritize refined materials, stronger towing and off‑road …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW Tayron is visibly cheaper – starting at 40,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,107 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Tayron uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the VW Tayron offers considerably more range – reaching up to 123 km, about 63 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Tayron

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Tayron is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.1 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, VW Tayron is markedly lighter – 1,682 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 449 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Tayron offers considerably more boot space – 885 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 627 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries slightly more – 650 kg compared to 573 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Tayron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,200
Tayron

VW Tayron

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 116 - 123 km
details
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Tayron

The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.

details
DB2024AU01656_large
DB2024AU01657_large
DB2024AU01676_large
DB2024AU01690_large

Reviews VW Tayron

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Jack
4 May 2026, 15:16:08

Top suspension, performance more than adequate, trunk gigantic, and the Matrix headlights are great.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Charley
12 Apr 2026, 05:53:48

Good-looking model. Comfortable but also sporty to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW Touran
VW Tayron
VS
The VW Touran remains the no-nonsense family workhorse — clever 7-seat packaging, sliding rear seats and sensible engines make it the practical choice when boot space and child seats are top priorities. The VW Tayron, by contrast, dresses up as a chunky SUV with higher stance and sharper styling, …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Peugeot 5008
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 5008 and the VW Tayron is really a choice between roomy, characterful French design and the composed, quietly refined German approach. I’ll compare their space, comfort, engines and tech so you can decide which midsize SUV fits your family life and driving style best.
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Kia Sorento
VW Tayron
VS
Comparing the Kia Sorento and the VW Tayron pits a roomy, value-focused family SUV against Volkswagen’s more style- and technology-oriented offering. This quick guide will outline their key differences in space, driving character, efficiency and features so you can choose the better fit.
Toyota RAV4
VW Tayron
VS
In the left corner, the Toyota RAV4 brings proven reliability, frugal hybrid powertrains and genuine all‑road grit — the sensible choice if you value resale, low running costs and a knack for getting off the beaten track. Opposite it, the VW Tayron punches above its class with sharp styling, a …
VW Passat
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Passat and the Tayron means weighing the traditional, comfortable midsize virtues of the Passat against the Tayron’s SUV stance, higher seating position and bolder styling. I’ll compare practicality, driving dynamics, technology and value to help you pick the one that fits your …
VW Tiguan
VW Tayron
VS
Comparing the VW Tiguan and the VW Tayron helps buyers choose between the Tiguan’s well-rounded, globally proven compact-SUV package and the Tayron’s China-focused, often roomier take on VW’s MQB platform. While they share mechanical roots, the Tiguan leans toward refined driving manners and broad …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
40,200 - 56,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
116 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
33 - 192 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,682 - 1,948 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,853 - 1,866 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
489 - 573 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.