VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Skoda Kodiaq?

Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • somewhat more power

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

CX-80

An In-Depth Comparison: Mazda CX-80 vs. Skoda Kodiaq

The automotive landscape is continuously evolving, with manufacturers pushing the boundaries of technology, performance, and innovation. In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, two contenders are making waves: the Mazda CX-80 and the Skoda Kodiaq. Both vehicles cater to families and adventure seekers alike, offering ample space, advanced features, and a range of powertrains. However, which one takes the lead in this head-to-head comparison? Let’s dive into the details.

Kodiaq

Design and Dimensions

With a length of 4995 mm, the Mazda CX-80 is larger than the Skoda Kodiaq, which measures 4758 mm. The width of the CX-80 at 1890 mm slightly surpasses the Kodiaq's 1864 mm, while the height is comparable, with the CX-80 at 1714 mm and the Kodiaq between 1679-1683 mm. This additional size in the CX-80 translates to a more spacious cabin and potentially better cargo capacity. The CX-80 also boasts a modern, sleek design consistent with Mazda's KODO philosophy, while the Kodiaq presents a more practical, angular aesthetic typical of Skoda’s design language.

CX-80

Powertrains and Performance

Both SUVs offer a variety of engine options that appeal to different types of drivers. The Mazda CX-80 features two engines: a powerful 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV. For those focused on sustainability, the electric range of up to 60 km is a notable advantage. The CX-80 excels in acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in just 6.8 seconds for the hybrid variant, while its maximum speed can reach 195 km/h.

On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq's lineup includes a 204 HP Plugin Hybrid, a 193 HP Petrol MHEV, and various petrol and diesel options totaling four engines. The Kodiaq offers impressive flexibility with different power outputs, achieving 0-100 km/h in a respectable 7.8 seconds. However, in terms of performance metrics, the CX-80 takes the edge with higher maximum power and quicker acceleration.

Kodiaq

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

The Mazda CX-80 demonstrates exceptional fuel efficiency, particularly with its plug-in hybrid, consuming just 1.6 L/100km. The diesel variant, while less efficient than its hybrid counterpart, still performs well at 5.7 L/100km. In contrast, the Kodiaq’s fuel consumption varies significantly depending on the engine choice, with the most economical diesel model consuming around 5.3 L/100km. Both vehicles receive a 'B' efficiency class rating, but the CX-80's hybrid evidently stands out as a more eco-friendly option with lower CO2 emissions, registering at 35 g/km compared to Kodiaq's higher emissions range.

CX-80

Interior Space and Features

Inside, both SUVs prioritize comfort and versatility. The Mazda CX-80 offers seating for up to seven passengers, making it a great choice for larger families or those needing extra space. However, the Skoda Kodiaq provides exceptional trunk capacity, boasting between 745 to 910 liters, compared to the CX-80's 258 liters. This is a considerable advantage for those who need a generous amount of cargo space for long road trips.

In terms of technology, both models are equipped with the latest infotainment systems. While Mazda's interface is often praised for its user-friendly layout, Skoda offers innovative features like a virtual cockpit, which enhances the driver's experience. Both vehicles also come with a full suite of safety features, including advanced driver assistance systems.

Kodiaq

Conclusion: Which One Reigns Supreme?

While both the Mazda CX-80 and Skoda Kodiaq cater to similar markets, their strengths vary significantly. The CX-80 excels in performance and efficiency, making it the choice for those prioritizing driving dynamics and sustainability. On the other hand, the Kodiaq shines with its vast interior space and practicality, appealing particularly to families who need room for both passengers and cargo.

Ultimately, the decision will hinge on individual preferences: whether one leans towards performance and innovation or practicality and spaciousness, both vehicles present fantastic options in the competitive SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kodiaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,451 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 62 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers somewhat more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is visibly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 447 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 652 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries moderately more – 650 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 87 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4,758 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.