In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and functionality. While the CX-80 highlights Mazda's commitment to driving pleasure, the Kodiaq shines as a dependable all-rounder tailored to meet everyday needs.
The automotive landscape is continuously evolving, with manufacturers pushing the boundaries of technology, performance, and innovation. In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, two contenders are making waves: the Mazda CX-80 and the Skoda Kodiaq. Both vehicles cater to families and adventure seekers alike, offering ample space, advanced features, and a range of powertrains. However, which one takes the lead in this head-to-head comparison? Let’s dive into the details.
With a length of 4995 mm, the Mazda CX-80 is larger than the Skoda Kodiaq, which measures 4758 mm. The width of the CX-80 at 1890 mm slightly surpasses the Kodiaq's 1864 mm, while the height is comparable, with the CX-80 at 1714 mm and the Kodiaq between 1679-1683 mm. This additional size in the CX-80 translates to a more spacious cabin and potentially better cargo capacity. The CX-80 also boasts a modern, sleek design consistent with Mazda's KODO philosophy, while the Kodiaq presents a more practical, angular aesthetic typical of Skoda’s design language.
Both SUVs offer a variety of engine options that appeal to different types of drivers. The Mazda CX-80 features two engines: a powerful 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV. For those focused on sustainability, the electric range of up to 60 km is a notable advantage. The CX-80 excels in acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in just 6.8 seconds for the hybrid variant, while its maximum speed can reach 195 km/h.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq's lineup includes a 204 HP Plugin Hybrid, a 193 HP Petrol MHEV, and various petrol and diesel options totaling four engines. The Kodiaq offers impressive flexibility with different power outputs, achieving 0-100 km/h in a respectable 7.8 seconds. However, in terms of performance metrics, the CX-80 takes the edge with higher maximum power and quicker acceleration.
The Mazda CX-80 demonstrates exceptional fuel efficiency, particularly with its plug-in hybrid, consuming just 1.6 L/100km. The diesel variant, while less efficient than its hybrid counterpart, still performs well at 5.7 L/100km. In contrast, the Kodiaq’s fuel consumption varies significantly depending on the engine choice, with the most economical diesel model consuming around 5.3 L/100km. Both vehicles receive a 'B' efficiency class rating, but the CX-80's hybrid evidently stands out as a more eco-friendly option with lower CO2 emissions, registering at 35 g/km compared to Kodiaq's higher emissions range.
Inside, both SUVs prioritize comfort and versatility. The Mazda CX-80 offers seating for up to seven passengers, making it a great choice for larger families or those needing extra space. However, the Skoda Kodiaq provides exceptional trunk capacity, boasting between 745 to 910 liters, compared to the CX-80's 258 liters. This is a considerable advantage for those who need a generous amount of cargo space for long road trips.
In terms of technology, both models are equipped with the latest infotainment systems. While Mazda's interface is often praised for its user-friendly layout, Skoda offers innovative features like a virtual cockpit, which enhances the driver's experience. Both vehicles also come with a full suite of safety features, including advanced driver assistance systems.
While both the Mazda CX-80 and Skoda Kodiaq cater to similar markets, their strengths vary significantly. The CX-80 excels in performance and efficiency, making it the choice for those prioritizing driving dynamics and sustainability. On the other hand, the Kodiaq shines with its vast interior space and practicality, appealing particularly to families who need room for both passengers and cargo.
Ultimately, the decision will hinge on individual preferences: whether one leans towards performance and innovation or practicality and spaciousness, both vehicles present fantastic options in the competitive SUV market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 47400 - 59400
£
|
Price
about 36000 - 49600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
60
km
|
Electric Range
113 - 123
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
co2
35 - 148
g/km
|
co2
9 - 186
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240
kg
|
Curb weight
1661 - 1859
kg
|
Trunk capacity
258
L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910
L
|
Length
4995
mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761
mm
|
Width
1890
mm
|
Width
1864
mm
|
Height
1714
mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683
mm
|
Payload
649 - 650
kg
|
Payload
497 - 538
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
254 - 327
HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
Torque
500 - 550
Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
187 - 241
kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195
kW
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
195 - 219
km/h
|
Top speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.