Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (327 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (49300 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Skoda Kodiaq?
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12480 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L. The difference is about 2.50 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs convincingly better – achieving up to 122 km, about 62 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a slightly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls distinct stronger with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is noticeable lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 447 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 652 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 a bit takes the win – 650 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 87 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49300 - 61400 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?
The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.