Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Skoda Kodiaq or Volvo XC60?
The competition in the mid-size SUV segment is fierce, and two models that have caught the attention of automotive enthusiasts are the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC60. Both vehicles offer a unique combination of style, performance, and advanced technology. This article will offer a detailed comparison of these two popular models, focusing on their technical specifications and innovations.
The Skoda Kodiaq is known for its robust appearance with a practical design that emphasizes functionality. The bold front grille and sharp lines add to its assertive stance on the road. In contrast, the Volvo XC60 boasts a more elegant and luxurious design, characterized by its sleek profile and distinctive Thor’s Hammer LED headlights, which enhance its premium appeal.
The Skoda Kodiaq provides a versatile range of powertrains, including petrol, diesel, and hybrid options. For 2024, it offers power outputs ranging from 150 HP to 265 HP, with impressive torque figures reaching up to 400 Nm. Its 0-100 km/h acceleration times are competitive, with the top variant achieving this in just 6.3 seconds.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 delivers a strong emphasis on performance, featuring a range of petrol and hybrid engines. Its most powerful variant boasts 455 HP and can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in an exhilarating 4.9 seconds. The XC60 also comes equipped with all-wheel drive as standard, ensuring superior handling and stability across various driving conditions.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Skoda Kodiaq offers commendable figures, especially from its hybrid variants, with consumption rates as low as 0.4 L/100 km. Its electric range is also notable, reaching up to 123 km on a full charge, allowing for significant electric-only driving.
The Volvo XC60, while not as efficient in hybrid mode, still provides a respectable fuel consumption of 7.7 L/100 km and an electric range of 80 km. The XC60 is primarily focused on performance, which is reflected in its emissions, with CO2 emissions as low as 22 g/km for hybrid models.
Inside, the Skoda Kodiaq is designed with spaciousness in mind, offering a trunk capacity of up to 910 liters, making it highly practical for families or long trips. Its interior is equipped with high-quality materials and the latest tech features, providing a modern, user-friendly environment.
The Volvo XC60, although slightly smaller in trunk space (up to 483 liters), excels in comfort and luxury. The Scandinavian design philosophy is evident throughout the cabin, with premium upholstery and a clean, minimalist dashboard that houses a comprehensive infotainment system with intuitive controls.
Both SUVs prioritize safety, featuring advanced driver-assistance systems. The Skoda Kodiaq includes adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a host of airbags to ensure passenger safety. Its value-oriented pricing makes these innovations all the more impressive.
The Volvo XC60 takes safety seriously, incorporating the brand's reputation for robust safety features. With systems like Pilot Assist and a comprehensive suite of sensors, the XC60 aims to provide a superior level of protection for its occupants, often earning top marks in safety tests worldwide.
In summary, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC60 cater to different driver needs and preferences. The Kodiaq impresses with its extensive versatility, space, and cost-effectiveness, making it an enticing option for families. Meanwhile, the XC60 excels in luxury, performance, and cutting-edge safety technology, appealing to those who prioritize a premium driving experience.
Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC60 will depend on individual priorities, whether it's practicality or a lavish array of features. Either way, both SUVs stand as great representations of their brands, making them worthy contenders in the ever-evolving automotive landscape.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 12343 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 2.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – achieving up to 123 km, about 41 km more than the Volvo XC60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a significantly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls decisively stronger with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is a bit lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 216 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 427 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 562 L more than the Volvo XC60.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 slight takes the win – 550 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 545 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España