Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (243 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Skoda Kodiaq?
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Kuga has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2606 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.80 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs convincingly better – achieving up to 122 km, about 54 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a minimal edge – offering 265 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slightly better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Ford Kuga tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is to a small extent lighter – 1526 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 498 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – up to 2105 L, which is about 571 L more than the Ford Kuga.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq minimal takes the win – 563 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Kuga
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Ford Kuga
4.1 (4 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Ford Kuga
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.