In the competitive crossover segment, the Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq each offer unique strengths that cater to different drivers. The Kuga impresses with its agile handling and tech-savvy interior, making it a great choice for urban dwellers who value both style and functionality. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands out with its spacious seating and robust build, making it an ideal option for families seeking comfort and practicality on longer journeys.
In the world of SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq have emerged as two formidable contenders, each appealing to a slightly different market segment. This article aims to dissect their offerings across various parameters including technical features, performance metrics, and innovative technologies.
The Ford Kuga boasts a diverse range of engine options catering to a wide spectrum of preferences. Available engines include petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid configurations, generating power outputs ranging from 150 HP to an impressive 243 HP. This provides versatility for various driving styles and needs. The Kuga offers a choice of manual and automatic transmissions, with front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive variants.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq presents a mix of petrol, diesel, and hybrid options, specifically including a petrol MHEV and plug-in hybrid model. Its power range starts from 150 HP and goes up to 204 HP. The Kodiaq is equipped with a sophisticated automatic double-clutch transmission that enhances driving performance and fuel efficiency. Both SUVs demonstrate strong performance with the Ford Kuga's 0-100 km/h times between 7.3 to 9.5 seconds, while the Kodiaq ranges from 7.8 to 9.7 seconds, depending on the variant.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the Ford Kuga offers an impressive lineup of consumption figures, with the hybrid variants demonstrating remarkably low fuel usage of up to 0.9 L/100km for electric driving. The electric-only range of 69 km for Kuga’s plug-in hybrid variant adds to its eco-friendliness, making it suitable for daily commutes.
The Skoda Kodiaq, meanwhile, also emphasizes efficiency with fuel consumption ranging from 0.4 to 7.6 L/100km depending on the model. Its plug-in hybrid variant can achieve an electric range of 123 km, making it a practical choice for those who wish to minimize their carbon footprint while enjoying spacious interiors.
When it comes to interior space, the Skoda Kodiaq takes the lead. With a trunk capacity of 745 to 910 liters, it is ideal for families or travelers needing extra storage. The Ford Kuga provides a respectable trunk capacity of 412 liters, which may suffice for day-to-day use but falls short when compared to its rival.
Both vehicles accommodate five passengers comfortably, but the Kodiaq offers more headroom and legroom thanks to its larger dimensions (length of 4758 mm vs. Kuga's 4604 mm). This spaciousness translates to an overall more comfortable driving experience.
The Ford Kuga is well-equipped with a suite of safety features, including advanced driver assistance systems such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking. These innovations enhance the driver’s peace of mind, making it a suitable option for safety-conscious buyers.
The Skoda Kodiaq also excels in safety, launching with similar features and additional advantages like Skoda's Virtual Cockpit, which provides a digital instrument cluster that can be customized to display various driving stats and settings. This standout feature contributes to a tech-savvy feel within the cabin.
Both the Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq have their unique strengths, making them worthy competitors in the SUV segment. The Kuga is more performance-oriented with its multiple hybrid options and robust powertrain capabilities, while the Kodiaq shines in terms of space and innovative tech features.
Ultimately, the choice for prospective buyers will hinge on individual preferences—are you looking for a sporty drive with hybrid flexibility or a spacious family SUV loaded with tech? Either way, both models offer a compelling case for their respective user bases.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 34200 - 45000
£
|
Price
about 36000 - 49600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
69
km
|
Electric Range
113 - 123
km
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
co2
20 - 145
g/km
|
co2
9 - 186
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859
kg
|
Curb weight
1661 - 1859
kg
|
Trunk capacity
412
L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910
L
|
Length
4604 - 4645
mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761
mm
|
Width
1882
mm
|
Width
1864
mm
|
Height
1673 - 1681
mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683
mm
|
Payload
541 - 550
kg
|
Payload
497 - 538
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 243
HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
Torque
240
Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
110 - 178
kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195
kW
|
Engine capacity
1497 - 2488
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
Top speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.