VS

Ford Kuga vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Volvo XC60?

Ford Kuga vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • slightly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kuga

Introduction: Battle of the SUVs

The compact SUV segment has rapidly gained popularity, and two standout contenders are the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60. Both vehicles offer an appealing blend of performance, comfort, and modern technology, making them top choices for drivers looking for versatility and innovation. In this article, we will delve into the technical specifications and innovative features of these two vehicles, highlighting their strengths and unique offerings.

XC60

Power and Performance

When it comes to powertrains, the Ford Kuga offers a range of options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. The Kuga's petrol engines deliver power outputs of 150 HP, 180 HP, and a robust 243 HP in the top variant, with acceleration times ranging from 7.3 to 9.5 seconds for 0-100 km/h. The engine choices also provide impressive fuel efficiency, with consumption as low as 5.3 L/100 km and a CO2 emission rating reaching 122 g/km.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 takes performance up a notch with its powerful petrol mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid engines. The XC60 boasts power outputs of 250 HP in the base model and up to a staggering 455 HP in the high-performance variant. The acceleration for its most powerful trim is an impressive 4.9 seconds to 100 km/h, showcasing its sporty edge. Its fuel consumption starts at 7.7 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions as low as 22 g/km for the PHEV variants.

Kuga

Advanced Driving Technologies

Both vehicles are equipped with advanced driving technologies designed for safety and convenience. The Ford Kuga features Ford's Co-Pilot360 suite, which includes adaptive cruise control, lane centering, and stop-and-go functionality. Additionally, the Kuga's optional hybrid systems enhance fuel efficiency while delivering a seamless driving experience.

The Volvo XC60, famous for its safety pedigree, includes the innovative City Safety system, which provides automatic emergency braking and collision avoidance. It also boasts advanced adaptive cruise control and Pilot Assist, a feature that enables semi-autonomous driving on highways. Volvo's commitment to driver assistance technologies places the XC60 at the forefront of safety innovation.

XC60

Interior Comfort and Convenience

Stepping inside, both SUVs prioritize comfort, yet their approaches differ. The Ford Kuga's interior is spacious and user-friendly, with a modern aesthetic. It features a versatile trunk capacity of 412 L, expandable for larger cargo, and a range of infotainment options, including Ford's Sync 3 system, which supports Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60 sets a standard for premium interiors with its luxurious materials and impeccable build quality. With a trunk capacity of 483 L, the XC60 offers slightly more cargo space. The infotainment system is based on Volvo's Sensus interface, featuring a large touchscreen and advanced connectivity options. Volvo's focus on ergonomics and high-quality materials ensures a comfortable and upscale driving experience.

Kuga

Efficiency and Eco-Friendly Features

With environmental concerns being more prominent than ever, both SUVs offer eco-friendly features. The Ford Kuga provides hybrid options that can achieve impressive electric ranges of up to 69 km, making it suitable for short trips without burning fossil fuels. Its mild hybrid variant enhances efficiency further with low CO2 emissions.

The Volvo XC60 does not lag in this department, providing a plug-in hybrid variant with an electric range of up to 80 km, allowing for short commutes in electric-only mode. This blend of electric and traditional power helps reduce the XC60's carbon footprint, emphasizing Volvo's commitment to sustainability.

XC60

Conclusion: Choosing the Right SUV for You

In the Ford Kuga vs. Volvo XC60 showdown, both SUVs have their unique advantages. The Ford Kuga excels in offering a wider range of powertrains and flexible driving options, while the Volvo XC60 stands out for its luxurious interior, cutting-edge safety features, and performance capabilities. Ultimately, the choice will depend on what qualities and features matter most to you, whether it's the innovative tech of the Kuga or the sophisticated comfort of the XC60. Each vehicle respectfully caters to consumers' diverse needs within a competitive SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Kuga is substantially cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,949 £.

Both cars consume an average of 2.8 L/100km – no difference here.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 82 km, about 14 km more than the Ford Kuga.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 212 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers clearly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.

Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 550 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Ford Kuga
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Ford Kuga is the all-rounder that hustles through bends with eager steering and practical space to spare, while the Peugeot 3008 plays the style card with a plush, sculpted interior and a calmer, more refined ride. Pick the Kuga if you want driving engagement and value, choose the 3008 if cabin …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Focus
Ford Kuga
VS
The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
-
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.