Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Volvo XC60 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (243 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Volvo XC60?
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Kuga has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14949 £.
Both cars consume an average of 2.80 L per 100 km – no difference here.
As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 82 km, about 14 km more than the Ford Kuga.
XC60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 212 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.30 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls convincingly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly perceptible lighter – 1526 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers to a small extent more room – 483 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs slight better – up to 1543 L, which is about 9 L more than the Ford Kuga.
Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 550 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Volvo XC60 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo XC60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £49,200
Volvo XC60
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Kuga
4.1 (4 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Volvo XC60
5 (2 Reviews)
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.