In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
When it comes to family SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 are two compelling options that are making waves in the automotive market. Both vehicles blend practicality with style, tech, and performance. However, they come with distinct features and specifications that cater to different preferences. This comparison will delve into their technical aspects and innovations to help you decide which SUV may be the right fit for you.
At first glance, the Ford Kuga presents a robust and sporty design, highlighted by its strong lines and confident stance. With a length of 4604 to 4645 mm, a width of 1882 mm, and a height that ranges from 1673 to 1681 mm, it offers a spacious interior with a trunk capacity of 412 liters. In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 stands slightly taller and longer at 4745 mm, with a width of 1890 mm and a height of 1680 mm. It boasts an impressive trunk space of 570 liters, making it a more practical choice for those needing extra storage capacity.
Under the hood, the Ford Kuga offers a diverse array of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. Power outputs range from 150 HP to a robust 243 HP, with torque peaking at 240 Nm. Its fuel consumption ranges from 5.3 to 6.4 L/100 km, and it can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds, depending on the variant chosen.
Conversely, the Mazda CX-60 focuses on performance with its plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV options. The top performance model reaches a whopping 327 HP, further enhanced by torque figures that climb up to 550 Nm. The CX-60 is particularly notable for its acceleration capabilities, managing 0 to 100 km/h in an impressive 5.8 seconds. Fuel consumption can be as low as 1.4 L/100 km, making it a very efficient choice for environmentally-conscious drivers.
The Ford Kuga offers flexibility with both manual and automatic transmission options, catering to various driving preferences. It comes in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60 features an automatic transmission exclusively, delivering a smoother driving experience. The choice of all-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive provides drivers with options depending on their driving habits and conditions.
In today's market, connectivity and technology are key. The Ford Kuga is equipped with Ford's latest infotainment system, featuring a large touchscreen interface that supports smartphone integration via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Safety-wise, it boasts advanced driver-assistance features, making it an attractive option for families.
The Mazda CX-60 does not lag behind in technology either, as it offers an intuitive infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with various apps and services. Advanced safety technologies, such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, are standard, ensuring a safe and modern driving experience. Moreover, Mazda has made strides in incorporating sustainable materials into its cabin, enhancing the overall driving experience from an eco-friendly perspective.
Both the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 have their merits, catering to different segments of the SUV market. The Kuga’s versatility and engine options make it an ideal choice for those looking for a practical family SUV, while the CX-60's performance-oriented design and superior trunk capacity appeal to drivers craving a blend of agility and innovation.
Ultimately, your choice may come down to personal preference regarding style, driving experience, and the desired balance between efficiency and performance. Either way, both SUVs stand as strong contenders in the competitive automotive landscape, providing features and capabilities that are hard to overlook.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 34200 - 45000
£
|
Price
about 40600 - 56100
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
69
km
|
Electric Range
64
km
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
20 - 145
g/km
|
co2
31 - 139
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859
kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055
kg
|
Trunk capacity
412
L
|
Trunk capacity
570
L
|
Length
4604 - 4645
mm
|
Length
4745
mm
|
Width
1882
mm
|
Width
1890
mm
|
Height
1673 - 1681
mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688
mm
|
Payload
541 - 550
kg
|
Payload
581 - 612
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 243
HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4
s
|
Max Speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 219
km/h
|
Torque
240
Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Power kW
110 - 178
kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241
kW
|
Engine capacity
1497 - 2488
cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283
cm3
|
Top speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
Top speed
200 - 219
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.