VS

Ford Kuga vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Mazda CX-60?

Ford Kuga vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kuga

When it comes to family SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 are two compelling options that are making waves in the automotive market. Both vehicles blend practicality with style, tech, and performance. However, they come with distinct features and specifications that cater to different preferences. This comparison will delve into their technical aspects and innovations to help you decide which SUV may be the right fit for you.

CX-60

Design and Dimensions

At first glance, the Ford Kuga presents a robust and sporty design, highlighted by its strong lines and confident stance. With a length of 4604 to 4645 mm, a width of 1882 mm, and a height that ranges from 1673 to 1681 mm, it offers a spacious interior with a trunk capacity of 412 liters. In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 stands slightly taller and longer at 4745 mm, with a width of 1890 mm and a height of 1680 mm. It boasts an impressive trunk space of 570 liters, making it a more practical choice for those needing extra storage capacity.

Kuga

Powertrains and Performance

Under the hood, the Ford Kuga offers a diverse array of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. Power outputs range from 150 HP to a robust 243 HP, with torque peaking at 240 Nm. Its fuel consumption ranges from 5.3 to 6.4 L/100 km, and it can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds, depending on the variant chosen.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-60 focuses on performance with its plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV options. The top performance model reaches a whopping 327 HP, further enhanced by torque figures that climb up to 550 Nm. The CX-60 is particularly notable for its acceleration capabilities, managing 0 to 100 km/h in an impressive 5.8 seconds. Fuel consumption can be as low as 1.4 L/100 km, making it a very efficient choice for environmentally-conscious drivers.

CX-60

Transmission and Drivetrain

The Ford Kuga offers flexibility with both manual and automatic transmission options, catering to various driving preferences. It comes in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60 features an automatic transmission exclusively, delivering a smoother driving experience. The choice of all-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive provides drivers with options depending on their driving habits and conditions.

Kuga

Technology and Innovations

In today's market, connectivity and technology are key. The Ford Kuga is equipped with Ford's latest infotainment system, featuring a large touchscreen interface that supports smartphone integration via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Safety-wise, it boasts advanced driver-assistance features, making it an attractive option for families.

The Mazda CX-60 does not lag behind in technology either, as it offers an intuitive infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with various apps and services. Advanced safety technologies, such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, are standard, ensuring a safe and modern driving experience. Moreover, Mazda has made strides in incorporating sustainable materials into its cabin, enhancing the overall driving experience from an eco-friendly perspective.

CX-60

Conclusion: Which SUV is Right for You?

Both the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 have their merits, catering to different segments of the SUV market. The Kuga’s versatility and engine options make it an ideal choice for those looking for a practical family SUV, while the CX-60's performance-oriented design and superior trunk capacity appeal to drivers craving a blend of agility and innovation.

Ultimately, your choice may come down to personal preference regarding style, driving experience, and the desired balance between efficiency and performance. Either way, both SUVs stand as strong contenders in the competitive automotive landscape, providing features and capabilities that are hard to overlook.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Kuga is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,429 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Kuga offers marginally more range – reaching up to 68 km, about 5 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 84 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 364 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries moderately more – 612 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
2025_FORD_KUGA_BLACK_PACKAGE_01-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_11-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_09-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_04

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga means weighing a sleek, tech‑forward electric from BYD against Ford’s practical compact crossover—their strengths point to very different priorities. I’ll look at performance, range/fuel economy, interior space, practicality and running costs to help you …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.