In the burgeoning compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinct blends of style and utility. While the CX-60 offers a more upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, the RAV4 excels in practicality and fuel efficiency, making it a top choice for families. Ultimately, the decision between these two popular models will hinge on individual preferences for performance versus everyday functionality.
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and the Toyota RAV4 stand out as two formidable contenders. Both models have garnered attention for their innovative features, performance capabilities, and stylish designs. Let's explore how they stack up against each other in various aspects, from technical specifications to overall driving experience.
The Mazda CX-60 offers a range of powertrains that include a Plugin Hybrid option with a robust 327 horsepower and a Diesel MHEV variant that delivers a commendable 200 horsepower. With a torque output that reaches up to 550 Nm, the CX-60 excels in acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds with its most potent engine.
In contrast, the Toyota RAV4 provides a diverse lineup of engines, including a full hybrid and a plugin hybrid that max out at 306 horsepower. The RAV4's performance is highlighted by a decent 0-100 km/h time of around 8.1 seconds for the hybrid models, making it slightly less aggressive than the CX-60.
When it comes to consumption, the Mazda CX-60 impresses with its Plugin Hybrid, boasting an astonishing fuel consumption of just 1.4 L/100km. Even the Diesel MHEV variant performs well with 5.4 L/100km. The vehicle also features an electric range of 64 km, making it a great option for short trips.
On the other hand, the RAV4 demonstrates commendable efficiency as well, particularly with its hybrid model, which consumes about 5.6 L/100km. Its electric range surpasses that of the CX-60, reaching up to 75 km, allowing for more all-electric driving capability.
Both the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 are designed to seat five passengers comfortably, yet they differ slightly in their cargo capacity. The CX-60 offers 570 liters of trunk space while the RAV4 provides slightly more at 580 liters. This additional space in the RAV4 can be a key factor for families or those needing extra storage for outdoor adventures.
Interior quality is another area where both vehicles excel. The CX-60 is known for its premium materials and a driver-centric layout, while the RAV4 balances functionality with modern technology, including an intuitive infotainment system that appeals to tech-savvy users.
In terms of dimensions, the Mazda CX-60 is slightly larger than the RAV4, measuring 4745 mm in length compared to the RAV4's 4600 mm. The CX-60's width of 1890 mm also gives it a more robust stance on the road. However, the RAV4's lighter curb weight of 1745 kg (versus the CX-60's 2055 kg) may contribute to more nimble handling, especially in urban environments.
Safety is paramount in both models, with each outfitted with a robust suite of safety technologies. The CX-60 includes advanced driver assistance systems such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, while the RAV4 features Toyota's Safety Sense suite, combining road sign assist and pre-collision systems, enriching the overall safety profile.
Ultimately, the decision between the Mazda CX-60 and the Toyota RAV4 will come down to personal preferences and specific needs. The Mazda CX-60 shines with superior power, groundbreaking fuel efficiency, and a luxurious interior, making it an excellent choice for performance enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Toyota RAV4's reliability, spaciousness, and engaging technology make it a strong contender for families and everyday drivers.
Whether you prioritize a thrilling drive with the CX-60 or the practicality of the RAV4, both vehicles offer compelling features that cater to a variety of lifestyles. Test-driving both models is highly recommended to find the ultimate fit for your automotive needs.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 40600 - 56100
£
|
Price
about 35100 - 55700
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
1 - 5.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
64
km
|
Electric Range
75
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
31 - 139
g/km
|
co2
22 - 128
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055
kg
|
Curb weight
1745 - 1910
kg
|
Trunk capacity
570
L
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 580
L
|
Length
4745
mm
|
Length
4600
mm
|
Width
1890
mm
|
Width
1855
mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688
mm
|
Height
1685
mm
|
Payload
581 - 612
kg
|
Payload
390 - 600
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
200 - 327
HP
|
Power HP
218 - 306
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.4
s
|
Max Speed
200 - 219
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
450 - 550
Nm
|
Torque
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
147 - 241
kW
|
Power kW
160 - 225
kW
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283
cm3
|
Engine capacity
2487
cm3
|
Top speed
200 - 219
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2020 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.