In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those seeking a blend of style and innovation. While the RAV4 offers practicality and versatility, the XC40 delivers a luxurious driving experience that redefines what a compact SUV can be.
The SUV segment continues to grow, offering consumers a vast array of choices that meet diverse needs and preferences. Among the most popular options are the Toyota RAV4 and the Volvo XC40. While both vehicles are designed for everyday comfort and utility, they come with distinct characteristics that are worth exploring. This article offers a detailed comparison between these two formidable contenders in the compact SUV market.
The Toyota RAV4 comes equipped with a variety of powertrain options, including full hybrid and plug-in hybrid configurations. The hybrid variants generate a maximum power output of up to 218 HP, while the plug-in model reaches an impressive 306 HP. Its acceleration performance allows the RAV4 to sprint from 0-100 km/h in as little as 6 seconds, making it competitive in its class.
In contrast, the Volvo XC40 is powered by a petrol MHEV engine, offering power output options of 163 HP to 197 HP. While the XC40 showcases commendable acceleration with figures of 7.6 to 8.6 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint, it does not quite match the performance benchmarks set by the RAV4 hybrids.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with consumption rates as low as 1 L/100 km for its plug-in hybrid variant. The hybrid versions achieve rates of approximately 5.6 L/100 km, making it an excellent choice for eco-conscious drivers.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 has a fuel consumption of around 6.5 L/100 km. While not as efficient as the RAV4, the XC40's performance suitable for daily commutes and city driving caters to a different audience that may prioritize petrol performance over hybrid efficiency.
Both vehicles offer spacious interiors designed for five passengers, but they differ in cargo space. The Toyota RAV4 boasts an impressive trunk capacity ranging from 520 to 580 liters, depending on the variant, which is ideal for families and road trips.
In comparison, the Volvo XC40 provides a trunk capacity of 452 liters. This difference may be noticeable for those who frequently transport larger items or luggage. However, the XC40 excels in upscale interior design and luxurious materials, making it feel more premium and inviting.
Size-wise, the RAV4 measures 4600 mm in length, 1855 mm in width, and 1685 mm in height. This larger footprint provides a robust presence on the road and translates into its generous cargo area.
The Volvo XC40, while shorter at 4425 mm in length, slightly wider at 1863 mm, and lower at 1652 mm, offers a sporty and aggressive appearance. Its design features a slick silhouette accompanied by a unique front fascia that sets it apart in urban settings.
Safety is paramount in both models, as they come equipped with a series of advanced safety features. The Toyota RAV4 is renowned for its Toyota Safety Sense technology, which includes pre-collision systems, adaptive cruise control, and lane departure alerts.
The Volvo XC40, on the other hand, embodies Volvo's commitment to safety with its suite of standard safety features through the City Safety system, which detects potential collisions and acts to mitigate them. The XC40 also comes with an array of driver-assistance technologies that are designed to enhance safety and convenience.
Ultimately, the choice between the Toyota RAV4 and the Volvo XC40 comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If performance, fuel efficiency, and cargo space are at the top of your list, the RAV4 is difficult to beat. However, if you're looking for a premium vehicle that offers stylish design and advanced safety features, the XC40 is an excellent choice.
Both SUVs shine in their respective areas and are worthy contenders in the compact SUV market, aiming to provide comfort and performance to their drivers. Whether you lean towards the practical reliability of Toyota or the sophisticated elegance of Volvo, you're poised to enjoy the best of what modern automotive technology has to offer.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 35100 - 55700
£
|
Price
about 36400 - 46000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1 - 5.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
75
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
22 - 128
g/km
|
co2
147 - 148
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1745 - 1910
kg
|
Curb weight
1688
kg
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 580
L
|
Trunk capacity
452
L
|
Length
4600
mm
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Width
1855
mm
|
Width
1863
mm
|
Height
1685
mm
|
Height
1652
mm
|
Payload
390 - 600
kg
|
Payload
532
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
218 - 306
HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6
s
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
265 - 300
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
160 - 225
kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145
kW
|
Engine capacity
2487
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2020 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.