@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Skoda Karoq vs Volvo XC40 – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Skoda Karoq meets Volvo XC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Overview: Skoda Karoq vs Volvo XC40

The compact SUV segment remains fiercely competitive, with well-engineered models including the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC40. Both vehicles deliver a blend of performance, practicality, and premium features, making them top choices for various buyers. In this article, we compare the technical specifications and innovations of these 2024 models to determine which SUV holds the advantage.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance

The Skoda Karoq is available with a variety of engine options, including petrol and diesel variants, ranging from 115 to 190 HP. This flexibility allows it to cater to different driving preferences and efficiency needs. Notably, the Karoq has a broad spectrum of acceleration capabilities, with 0-100 km/h times between 7 and 10.6 seconds. The top speed varies among models, reaching up to 221 km/h.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 is exclusively powered by a 2.0-liter petrol mild hybrid engine with power outputs of 163 or 197 HP. This engine propels the XC40 from 0-100 km/h in 7.6 to 8.6 seconds, with a maximum speed capped at 180 km/h, adhering to Volvo's policy for enhanced safety. While its engine lineup is less diverse, the MHEV technology offers smoother power delivery and improved fuel efficiency, listed at 6.5 L/100 km.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Transmission and Drive Options

The Karoq presents versatility in its drivetrain choices, offering both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations along with manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, to cater to different driving styles and terrains.

Conversely, the XC40 focuses on front-wheel drive with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, emphasizing ease of driving and reduced emissions, aligning with Volvo's commitment to sustainability and innovation.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Dimensions and Practicality

The Skoda Karoq measures slightly less in length at 4,390 mm, and it stands 1603 to 1624 mm tall, making it a tad more compact but effectively utilizing its 521-liter trunk capacity. Moreover, its flexibility in payload capacity, ranging from 426 kg to 573 kg, ensures it can handle various load requirements.

The Volvo XC40, slightly larger at 4425 mm in length and 1652 mm high, offers a trunk capacity of 452 liters. Despite a smaller cargo space, its payload capacity of 532 kg provides ample room for most needs, ensuring that practicality isn't compromised.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Interior and Comfort

Both the Karoq and XC40 accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Karoq's interior is built with functionality in mind, incorporating Skoda's signature Simply Clever features to enhance convenience and comfort. Its range of trims allows buyers to select from essential to premium finishes, suiting a broad audience.

The XC40 embodies Scandinavian luxury, featuring a meticulously crafted interior with high-quality materials and an array of standard comforts, reinforcing Volvo's position in the premium market. Innovative touches like the intuitive infotainment system and ergonomic seating make it a pleasure to drive and ride in.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Environmental Impact and Efficiency

The Karoq's CO2 emissions range from 129 g/km to 174 g/km, depending on the chosen powertrain. Its wider choice of engines means users can pick between performance or efficiency to match their environmental goals.

The Volvo XC40 maintains a consistent CO2 efficiency with emissions measured at 147-148 g/km. The mild hybrid system successfully balances performance with eco-friendliness, emphasizing Volvo's focus on reducing its carbon footprint.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Conclusion

Both the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC40 present compelling options in the compact SUV market for 2024. The Karoq shines with its versatility and practical features, appealing to drivers who desire a balance between performance and utility. In contrast, the XC40 offers an elegant design, eco-friendly technologies, and premium comforts, solidifying its role as a luxury compact SUV.

Ultimately, the choice between these two will boil down to preferences focusing on versatility with the Karoq or premium innovation with the XC40.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Karoq has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 7680 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Karoq manages with 4.90 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.60 L per 100 km.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 197 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs slightly better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 41 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Karoq pulls slightly stronger with 360 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Karoq is clearly perceptible lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 308 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers slightly more room – 521 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 69 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs slightly better – up to 1630 L, which is about 302 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq slight takes the win – 549 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 17 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Karoq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £29,100
Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L
details

Skoda Karoq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Volvo XC40

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 41700 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
128 - 173 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
521 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1841 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
456 - 549 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each offering a blend of practicality and style. The Tucson impresses with its bold design and advanced technology features, while the Karoq stands out for its spacious interior and excellent …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Duster
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Dacia Duster and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each catering to distinct buyer preferences. The Duster offers an impressive value proposition with its rugged design and practical features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and Skoda Karoq stand out with their impressive blend of style and functionality. While the Sportage boasts a bold design with advanced tech features, the Karoq emphasizes practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families. …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
What drive types are available for the Skoda Karoq?

The Skoda Karoq is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.