In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and Skoda Karoq stand out with their impressive blend of style and functionality. While the Sportage boasts a bold design with advanced tech features, the Karoq emphasizes practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families. Ultimately, both vehicles offer excellent performance and comfort, but each caters to different preferences in design and utility.
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, two vehicles are making waves: the Kia Sportage and the Skoda Karoq. Both models boast advanced technology, impressive design, and a range of engine options tailored to meet diverse driving needs. This article compares these two popular models, focusing on their technical specifications, performance, and innovative features to help buyers make an informed decision.
The Kia Sportage measures 4,515 mm in length, 1,865 mm in width, and 1,650 mm in height, giving it a robust and modern stance on the road. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq is slightly more compact, at 4,390 mm long and 1,841 mm wide, with a height ranging from 1,603 mm to 1,624 mm depending on the variant.
Both SUVs offer a five-door configuration with ample space for passengers. The Sportage provides a trunk capacity that varies between 526 to 587 liters, while the Karoq offers a slightly smaller trunk at 521 liters, showcasing practical storage options in both models.
The Kia Sportage offers a diverse range of engine options, including Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Petrol, and Plugin Hybrid configurations. Power output ranges from a respectable 136 HP to an impressive 252 HP. The Sportage's acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in as little as 8.3 seconds, demonstrating its sporty potential.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Karoq offers a choice between petrol and diesel engines with power outputs from 115 HP to 190 HP. While slightly less powerful than the Sportage, the Karoq still delivers commendable performance, with the 0-100 km/h time as low as 7 seconds. Both models come with the option of both manual and automatic transmissions, catering to various driving preferences.
Fuel efficiency is a critical factor for most SUV buyers, and both the Sportage and Karoq have made significant strides in this area. The Sportage boasts fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.0 to 7.2 L/100 km, with variants that can achieve remarkable electric ranges of up to 64 km in hybrid trims. The Karoq, on the other hand, provides slightly less efficiency, with figures from 4.9 to 7.6 L/100 km across its engine lineup.
Both vehicles also feature competitive CO2 emissions rates, making them attractive options for environmentally conscious consumers. The Sportage's emissions vary between 135 to 162 g/km, while the Karoq maintains a slightly better range between 129 to 174 g/km, depending on the engine choice.
When it comes to technology, both models are equipped with features designed to enhance the driving experience and safety. The Kia Sportage includes advanced driver assistance systems, a user-friendly infotainment system with a touchscreen interface, and connectivity features like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
The Skoda Karoq, famous for its practical and intuitive interior layout, also offers a comprehensive infotainment system, alongside a range of driver aids such as adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and parking sensors. Skoda’s Clever Storage solutions in the Karoq add to its appeal, ensuring that everyday items have designated places within the cabin.
In conclusion, both the Kia Sportage and Skoda Karoq offer a compelling blend of performance, efficiency, and technology that make them strong contenders in the compact SUV market. The Sportage stands out for its extensive range of powertrains and impressive hybrid options, while the Karoq excels with its practical design and innovative storage solutions. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences—be it the Sportage’s versatile power options or the Karoq’s user-friendly technology and design prowess. Regardless of your choice, both vehicles promise an engaging driving experience and modern conveniences tailored for today’s consumers.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 29700 - 44700
£
|
Price
about 28400 - 41000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.2
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
64
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
28 - 162
g/km
|
co2
129 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1905
kg
|
Curb weight
1364 - 1608
kg
|
Trunk capacity
526 - 587
L
|
Trunk capacity
521
L
|
Length
4515
mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390
mm
|
Width
1865
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1650
mm
|
Height
1603 - 1624
mm
|
Payload
510 - 565
kg
|
Payload
426 - 573
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Automatikgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
136 - 252
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6
s
|
Max Speed
180 - 194
km/h
|
Max Speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Torque
265 - 350
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
100 - 185
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
180 - 194
km/h
|
Top speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.